dalliancekay:

Aziraphale needs to finally learn…

….how awful Heaven and Gabriel/Archangels/Metatron are…

image
image
image



image
image


image
image


And for anyone who might think Aziraphale’s paranoia is stupid, a reminder.

image
image
image
image
image
image



image

[I know about the Arrangement]

IF YOU WANT TO WORK WITH CROWLEY AGAIN; as Supreme Archangel, you’ll have the power to reinstate him as an angel and do it that way. [And that’s the only way.]

There is absolutely no option for Aziraphale to stay and stay with Crowley. None. Zero. Nilch. Nada.

It’s not said out loud what will happen if he insist he won’t take the job (or it is and we have not seen it because Aziraphale doesn’t tell Crowley about it).
But he definitely doesn’t have the option to stay and carry on stopping Armageddons and hiding wayward Archangels.


P.S.

image
image
image

Gifs by the wonderfully talented @crowlixcx and @fuckyeahgoodomens ā¤ļøā¤ļøā¤ļøā¤ļøā¤ļøā¤ļø

lenaellsi:

image

redemption

ally-gator-animator:

currentlycryingaboutlancelot:

lovesodeepandwideandwell:

currentlycryingaboutlancelot:

ā€˜roofs’ looks unbelievably stupid typed out. why can we not say ā€˜rooves.’ clown language with clown plurals

If the plural of roof were rooves, the singular of grooves would have to be groof. Is that what you want?

point taken I’ll do anything to avoid groof

image

(via cheesecakemermaid1048)

desertdollranch:

At my most recent re-read of Addy’s stories, I noticed a detail in Addy Learns a Lesson that I hadn’t caught ever before. I want to bring your attention to it, because I think it’s important.Ā Ā 

First: throw out your BeForever books. Get the first editions with the illustrations by Melodye Rosales, because they are luminous, expressive, and rich. They portray Addy as the sweet young girl she is, seeing as how they were modeled after Ms. Rosales’ own daughter Harmony.Ā 

In fact, do the same for you 1998 editions with the new illustrations by Dahl Taylor. They serve their purpose fine, but in some pictures I think Addy looks closer to 12 or 13 years old, and they’re a little less vibrant. But that’s a personal preference. They are inferior for another reason.

So in Addy Learns a Lesson, there’s a particular full-page illustration that shows Addy’s second day of school, when she first shares a desk with Harriet.
Let’s compare the two illustrations side-by-side. The 1993 edition (Rosales) is on the left; 1998 (Taylor) on the right.

image

While most of the changes mostly look minor (although changing the skin color of the students is an issue itself), there’s one detail that is very, very different. Look at the map on the wall behind the students. One’s a world map, and one’s a map of the United States.Ā 

Here’s why this matters: earlier in the book, there is a scene where Addy is describing the classroom as she enters it for the first time. There are rows of desk, there’s a stove, andĀ ā€œhuge black squares filled with writingā€ which are obviously blackboards. We can figure that out.Ā 

But the next sentence is this:Ā 

On another wall there was a large piece of paper filled with colorful shapes. What’s that for? Addy wondered.

The narrative never actually explains what that shape-covered paper is. Did you try to guess what it is? Or did you forget it and move on? The wording is so ambiguous that you really need to see the illustration and piece together that she was looking at a map of the United States.Ā Could anyone actually ever determine, without looking at the picture, that she’s referring to a map of the country? Addy has never seen a map of the US.Ā Just like how it was illegal to teach an enslaved person to read, this was an advantage for slaveholders. You can’t successfully escape slavery if you don’t know where you are, where you’re going, and which states are free states.Ā 

I can’t imagine why Dahl Taylor would have omitted the map of the states and used a world map instead. There’s really no point, except maybe he overlooked the meaning of the colored shapes entirely. And maybe this isn’t surprising: according to his page on the American Girl Wiki, some of his illustrationsĀ ā€œmade characters either lighter or darker than they were originally and some scenes less intense, changing several dynamics of the stories in images.ā€Ā 

It certainly does change a lot. I wish this detail, the map, had been preserved with the new illustration, because it adds such an interesting layer to the story by proving how incredibly smart and capable Addy and her mother are. They couldn’t have read a map during their journey even if they could have carried one. Still, they successfully followed an escape route entirely by remembering landmarks, paying attention to their surroundings, and knowing when to trust people. I’m so glad Melodye Rosales included that subtle detail.Ā 

(You can read more about why Ms. Rosales only illustrated the first three books in this article [here].)Ā 

hungry-skeleton:

macleod:

triapus:

This is how the James Web telescope works

A million little eyes staring into the cosmos to help paint a picture of our place in the universe.

That’s an angel

(via sarkos)

camilleflyingrotten:

image
image
image
image
image
image
the-adhd-sorcerer asked:

is good omens worth it? Should I watch it?

neil-gaiman:

No. Definitely not. Avoid it at costs. Otherwise you can find yourself sucked in to the story and characters and doomed.

vavoom-sorted-art:

Okay so

we’re having an angst war over on @goodomensafterdark and @gleafer, @gahellhimself-blog and I are having a competition who can spread the most pain and suffering. Here’s my contribution. Enjoy

image
image
image
image
image

don’t worry, this isn’t the end yet: here’s part two. | Part 3

gradoseena:

image

A child who once dreamed of becoming a Doctor… became one twice.

gahellhimself-blog:

Just something poetic for a change..

Because I’m obsessssd with this song!!

image
image
image
image
image


We look for love, no time for tears

Wasted water’s all that is

And it don’t make no flowers grow

Good things might come to those who wait

Not for those who wait too late

We gotta go for all we know


Just the two of us

We can make it if we try

Just the two of us

(Just the two of us)

Just the two of us

Building them castles in the sky

Just the two of us

You and I


I hear the crystal raindrops fall

On the window down the hall

And it becomes the morning dew

And darling when the morning comes

And I see the morning sun

I wanna be the one with you


Just the two of us

We can make it if we try

Just the two of us

(Just the two of us)

Just the two of us

Building big castles way on high

Just the two of us

You and I



And the last frame without text ..


image



Support me on KoFi if you like my work (and if you can)

(via gradoseena)

fellshish:

image

British people will say anything but ā€˜sex’

Anonymous asked:

don't use "ftm" it's outdated and offensive. it implies that the trans person was their agab, which we never were. i was always a boy, never a girl who became a boy.

hedwig-dordt:

derinthescarletpescatarian:

mirrepp:

theleakypen:

phoenixtawnyflower:

femmefurina-deactivated20240814:

anderswasrightt:

  1. i’m 35 years old. i’ve been IDing as trans or something similar to trans for nearly 20 years. i was probably calling myself FTM while you were playing tag during recess, anon.
  2. i WAS a girl. i IDed as a girl early in my life. i recognized myself as a girl, called myself a girl, lived as a girl, and was a girl. who then IDed as a man. hence, F t M.
  3. spend more time worrying about yourself instead of strangers on the internet, anon.

sorry not sorry if this comes off as needlessly hostile, but i’ve been getting a lot of shit from a lot of teenage trans kids about the language i use to describe my own goddamn experience, and i’m growing real fuckin weary of it.

i have elder trans friends who call themselves transsexuals and transvestites and trannies. are you going to seriously go to a 60-year-old trans person who survived the reagan years and tell her she’s not allowed to use certain language to describe herself because it might offend the delicate sensibilities of some teenager on the internet?

do yourself a favor and log off, find some real-life trans people who are over the age of 20 or 25, and spend time talking to them instead of getting all holier-than-thou at random strangers on tumblr.

It may be weird to encounter because it’s not the trans narrative that the media sells to us as ‘the only valid way to be trans’, but the 'I always knew I was x’ is not all-encompassing.

Anon there are more people than you think who were girls who grew up into men, or boys who grew up into women, or girls or boys who grew up to be nonbinary. There is a rather obscure theory that girl and boy are distinct genders from man and woman and while the most common trajectory is that boys grow into men and girls grow into women it’s not the rule.

Let people define themselves.

also if you think genderfluid people are real and you’re not just humoring us, you by definition have to allow that gender can change over time. I was a girl once. I am not a girl now.

Chiming in with solidarity to OP.

I feel very protective of my former identity BECAUSE there’s so little room in the Mainstream Trans Narrative ™️ for allowing gender to change.

I was a girl. Now I’m genderqueer. Maybe later I will find different words for myself.

There has to be room for all of us in the trans community or there’s no point to any of this.

Ive been here long enough to see words like ftm/mtf, afab/amab, transmale/female, trans man/woman all go through the cycle of ppl telling you to “Dont use X word its out dated. Now use this Y word”. Only for a year or two pass and suddenly “Y word is outdated. Now use Z word” like yall this is exhausting. Just because a word is old doesn’t automatically make it a slur or offensive.

They’re pulling high school clique bullshit out and just replacing 'uncool’ with 'problematic’ and pretending it’s activism somehow. We’re trying to get work done here not everybody is going to keep up with the ever-rotating lexicon of words.

I used to be a member of the commentariat where I learned the phrase

THERE IS NO QUEER REVIEW BOARD

Which has kinda helped me be a bit better at being decent

chappellsroans:

image
image

The Nightmare Before Christmas (1994) dir. Henry Selick

(via thetrueliesofafangirl)

luzdawn asked:

NEIL NEIL! There’s an article from Deadline Hollywood that says good omens is going to be renewed for a third season IS IT TRUE??? CAN I START SCREAMING ALREADY???

neil-gaiman:

Every day it’s getting closer. We aren’t quite there yet. But Amazon has definitely been doing things that make a third season more likely.

fiannalover:

“Kill yourself” is basic. “I hope your fandom gets a new installment that is objectively a great work but also tonally dissonant from the previous ones in a way that generates a huge newbie boom of people uninterested and hostile towards the history of the franchise” is smart. It’s possible. It’s terrifying. It’s happening right now.

(via videntefernandez)