69.255.225.138

May 2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.255.225.138 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Can you please unblock me on Wikipedia? I wasn't vandalizing pages on purpose. I was trying to fix mistakes. But you blocked me for some reason. Vandalizing is like editing George Washington's page and say that he is alive. That's not true. That IS vandalizing. However if I just edit 1 thing, I get blocked for vandalizing. That's NOT vandalizing. So can you please unblock me now? I was going to edit another page.

Decline reason:

Please demonstrate your understanding by telling us how your prior edits were disruptive, what you will do differently, and what edits you want to make. 331dot (talk) 17:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may want to review the various warnings you received on this page. You weren't blocked for vandalism, but for disruptive editing. Two different things. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 16:17, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

I reviewed all of the various warnings I received on this page. Can you please unblock me now? 69.255.225.138 (talk) 16:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

I'm not an admin, so no, I can't. Even if I could though, you apparently didn't read the guide to appealing blocks that you were linked to based on your request. DonIago (talk) 17:05, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Not an admin, however....

....it might be in your best interest to create an account. You may have trying to fix things, but maybe it was someone else who was disruptively editing. If you can prove to the admins that you can constructively edit without that fact of other people using the same IP address (it happens) that might be disruptively editing. Cheers! Fakescientist8000 16:59, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

I don't want to make an account but can you please tell an admin to actually unblock me? I wasn't doing this on purpose. 69.255.225.138 (talk) 17:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

You won't get confused with others if you (after you are unblocked) create an account, and an account is more private than an IP. 331dot (talk) 17:30, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

For the final time, can you please unblock me now please? :( 69.255.225.138 (talk) 17:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

I want to edit another page so badly! Please unblock me and the problem we be solved? 69.255.225.138 (talk) 18:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Can you please unblock me now? There is a mistake in the 2022 in animation page! 69.255.225.138 (talk) 19:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Did you read the result of your formal unblock request? Because you haven't responded in a way that suggests that you have. Continuing to simply ask to be unblocked could result in your ability to post to your Talk page being revoked, because you're not engaging with the issue. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 19:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.255.225.138 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm sorry that I keep begging you to unblock me. I did explain what I did with these edits so why can't you unblock me? I promise I won't vandalize or disrupt too many edits. I will source my edits for real, ok? I wasn't trying to disrupt the edits on purpose. I just want my block to expire. I'm sorry I was disrupting edits. I was just fixing the pages just the way it is.69.255.225.138 (talk) 19:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:56, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

69.255.225.138 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is the last time I'm saying this. I was blocked from editing Wikipedia because it says I did disruptive edits. I was just trying to fix mistakes spotted on some pages. I wasn't vandalizing and I was not trying to remove stuff on purpose. I have to sometimes remove stuff because there is a mistake or the source was wrong. I won't cause any more damage or disruption by editing like 100 pages a day. Maybe editing less can be a good idea so that way, I won't be blocked for disruptive edits again. And finally, I will make useful contributions instead like adding more sources. This is the last time I'm saying this. Can you positively please unblock me now that I have a reason? I want to edit a page so badly! Can you possibly do it today or tomorrow? Thank you and have a nice day.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This is the last time I'm saying this. I was blocked from editing Wikipedia because it says I did disruptive edits. I was just trying to fix mistakes spotted on some pages. I wasn't vandalizing and I was not trying to remove stuff on purpose. I have to sometimes remove stuff because there is a mistake or the source was wrong. I won't cause any more damage or disruption by editing like 100 pages a day. Maybe editing less can be a good idea so that way, I won't be blocked for disruptive edits again. And finally, I will make useful contributions instead like adding more sources. This is the last time I'm saying this. Can you positively please unblock me now that I have a reason? I want to edit a page so badly! Can you possibly do it today or tomorrow? Thank you and have a nice day. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is the last time I'm saying this. I was blocked from editing Wikipedia because it says I did disruptive edits. I was just trying to fix mistakes spotted on some pages. I wasn't vandalizing and I was not trying to remove stuff on purpose. I have to sometimes remove stuff because there is a mistake or the source was wrong. I won't cause any more damage or disruption by editing like 100 pages a day. Maybe editing less can be a good idea so that way, I won't be blocked for disruptive edits again. And finally, I will make useful contributions instead like adding more sources. This is the last time I'm saying this. Can you positively please unblock me now that I have a reason? I want to edit a page so badly! Can you possibly do it today or tomorrow? Thank you and have a nice day. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is the last time I'm saying this. I was blocked from editing Wikipedia because it says I did disruptive edits. I was just trying to fix mistakes spotted on some pages. I wasn't vandalizing and I was not trying to remove stuff on purpose. I have to sometimes remove stuff because there is a mistake or the source was wrong. I won't cause any more damage or disruption by editing like 100 pages a day. Maybe editing less can be a good idea so that way, I won't be blocked for disruptive edits again. And finally, I will make useful contributions instead like adding more sources. This is the last time I'm saying this. Can you positively please unblock me now that I have a reason? I want to edit a page so badly! Can you possibly do it today or tomorrow? Thank you and have a nice day. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

---