69.255.225.138

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 69.255.225.138 (talk) at 11:42, 8 September 2022 (Blocked again.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 2 years ago by Yamla in topic Blocked again.

January 2022

  Hello, I'm Wizzito. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Flash animated television series without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. wizzito | say hello! 00:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2022

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.255.225.138 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Help! I was blocked for editing Wikipedia for no reason! I was trying to add more information and sources to some pages. Why do you think I was vandalizing? I was not vandalizing Wikipedia. I was going to edit today but I was blocked for no apparent reason! I didn't do nothing wrong with this website. It is not necessary to block me for no reason. Can you please unblock me?

Decline reason:

It does not appear that this IP is blocked. Are you using a VPN? What message are you seeing when you try to edit? Could you paste the message you see when you try to edit into another unblock request? — Daniel Case (talk) 06:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.255.225.138 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was going to edit another wikipedia page because I found some false information but I'm blocked for no reason. I'm not using a VPN. Anytime I edit something, this error message keeps popping up. Can you please unblock me and the problem will be fixed? I wasn't vandalizing Wikipedia. Thanks.

Decline reason:

You forgot to paste the message you see when you try to edit. Note, in general, this happens because people were using a VPN but have now disabled it. That's great, no problem, but you have to wait a full 24 hours for the block to clear. Yamla (talk) 16:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2022

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Billy West. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:56, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that. I sourced his birth date from the 1952 in animation page and on IMDb. 69.255.225.138 (talk) 17:27, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Love's Labours Lost in Space. DonIago (talk) 21:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

It is true that David X. Cohen provided the voice of a computer that says "This is Vergon 6". However he is not credited in the credits. 69.255.225.138 (talk) 16:56, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Anthology of Interest II, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:56, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I removed Kath Soucie from the guest stars page as she is a recurring voice actor on Futurama. 69.255.225.138 (talk) 15:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Star of the Backstage. M.Bitton (talk) 12:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I sourced Elisabeth Kiernan Averick from the credits of The Star of the Backstage. It even says so in The Simpsons (season 33) page. 69.255.225.138 (talk) 16:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 14:44, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.255.225.138 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Can you please unblock me on Wikipedia? I wasn't vandalizing pages on purpose. I was trying to fix mistakes. But you blocked me for some reason. Vandalizing is like editing George Washington's page and say that he is alive. That's not true. That IS vandalizing. However if I just edit 1 thing, I get blocked for vandalizing. That's NOT vandalizing. So can you please unblock me now? I was going to edit another page.

Decline reason:

Please demonstrate your understanding by telling us how your prior edits were disruptive, what you will do differently, and what edits you want to make. 331dot (talk) 17:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may want to review the various warnings you received on this page. You weren't blocked for vandalism, but for disruptive editing. Two different things. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 16:17, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I reviewed all of the various warnings I received on this page. Can you please unblock me now? 69.255.225.138 (talk) 16:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'm not an admin, so no, I can't. Even if I could though, you apparently didn't read the guide to appealing blocks that you were linked to based on your request. DonIago (talk) 17:05, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Not an admin, however....

....it might be in your best interest to create an account. You may have trying to fix things, but maybe it was someone else who was disruptively editing. If you can prove to the admins that you can constructively edit without that fact of other people using the same IP address (it happens) that might be disruptively editing. Cheers! Fakescientist8000 16:59, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I don't want to make an account but can you please tell an admin to actually unblock me? I wasn't doing this on purpose. 69.255.225.138 (talk) 17:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
You won't get confused with others if you (after you are unblocked) create an account, and an account is more private than an IP. 331dot (talk) 17:30, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
For the final time, can you please unblock me now please? :( 69.255.225.138 (talk) 17:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
I want to edit another page so badly! Please unblock me and the problem we be solved? 69.255.225.138 (talk) 18:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Can you please unblock me now? There is a mistake in the 2022 in animation page! 69.255.225.138 (talk) 19:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Did you read the result of your formal unblock request? Because you haven't responded in a way that suggests that you have. Continuing to simply ask to be unblocked could result in your ability to post to your Talk page being revoked, because you're not engaging with the issue. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 19:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.255.225.138 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry that I keep begging you to unblock me. I did explain what I did with these edits so why can't you unblock me? I promise I won't vandalize or disrupt too many edits. I will source my edits for real, ok? I wasn't trying to disrupt the edits on purpose. I just want my block to expire. I'm sorry I was disrupting edits. I was just fixing the pages just the way it is.69.255.225.138 (talk) 19:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:56, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.255.225.138 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is the last time I'm saying this. I was blocked from editing Wikipedia because it says I did disruptive edits. I was just trying to fix mistakes spotted on some pages. I wasn't vandalizing and I was not trying to remove stuff on purpose. I have to sometimes remove stuff because there is a mistake or the source was wrong. I won't cause any more damage or disruption by editing like 100 pages a day. Maybe editing less can be a good idea so that way, I won't be blocked for disruptive edits again. And finally, I will make useful contributions instead like adding more sources. This is the last time I'm saying this. Can you positively please unblock me now that I have a reason? Thank you and have a nice day.

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.255.225.138 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Can you unblock me now?

Decline reason:

Additional open unblock requests will in no way speed the process here up, and instead may be viewed as disruptive. If you have a comment, or question to make, please do so without using the {{unblock}} formatting as you did below. SQLQuery Me! 17:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pushing the admins by sending another unblock request while you already have one pending seems likely to be counterproductive. Patience is a virtue, and all... DonIago (talk) 13:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
  You don't get to remove declined unblock requests on an active block. If you do that again, you're talk page access will be revoked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
It is getting close to May 31st. Can you please unblock me early? 69.255.225.138 (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

  Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that in this edit to 1977 in animation, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. jp×g 00:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I removed Jim Conroy because he was actually born in 1970, not 1977. There was a mistake in Wikipedia. Thanks. 69.255.225.138 (talk) 00:20, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Film Roman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Toasy Cake Fan 100 (talk) 00:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. I was just making the page better by sorting it out better. Thanks. 69.255.225.138 (talk) 00:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that in this edit to Invader Zim, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:07, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Can you put back my change of this page? All of the other Nickelodeon shows doesn't mention the animation studio that they subcontract for, ok? 69.255.225.138 (talk) 23:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Invader Zim. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:39, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I already mentioned the changes that I did, please don't block me again. Thanks. 69.255.225.138 (talk) 12:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 1994 in animation, you may be blocked from editing. XtraJovial (talkcontribs) 03:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I removed Jak Knight because he was actually born in 1993, not 1994. Thank you. 69.255.225.138 (talk) 03:39, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
I've reverted my revert. But in the future, please use edit summaries, especially when you're making significant content removals. Why you're removing something may be obvious to you, but it may not be to others. Happy editing! XtraJovial (talkcontribs) 03:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2022

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2022 in animation, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have made many unconstructive edits. This is your only warning before you are reported to AIV. Inspector Eevee (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I was adding the infamous HBO Max purge which did affect animation because many animation fans criticized this change and having popular shows removed. I wasn't vandalizing so please don't block me again. Thank you. 69.255.225.138 (talk) 18:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2022

Don't make a huge lists as you did to 1963 in animation. Just add notable items. If every one was added, the page would be unreadable. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 23:44, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked again.

Help! I got blocked by Wikipedia again. It claims that I vandalized but I was just using a VPN in the UK. The ip address was 146.70.0.0/16 although mine is 69.255.225.138. Can you please unblock me now? 69.255.225.138 (talk) 00:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.255.225.138 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 69.255.225.138. Not 146.70.0.0/16. I was just using my VPN to browse streaming services from around the world. I was going to edit, but I was blocked due to using this IP. Can you please unblock me? I wasn't vandalizing. It was because of my VPN. Thanks. 69.255.225.138 (talk) 00:58, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

If you were a registered user I would be referring you to make an IPBE request. But you're not. Most VPNs make use of known proxies around the world, many of which we block for long periods of time because they can and have been used to facilitate abuse of editing privileges. We can't help you as it stands if you insist on using your VPN. We know you're editing in good faith, but ... that by itself doesn't clear this bar, I'm afraid. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.255.225.138 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Although you can't really help me, can you please delete this IP (146.70.0.0/16.) from Wikipedia? That way, the problem will be solved. Can you please do this? Editing on Microsoft Edge is way harder than editing on Chrome. Delete this IP and we're good OK? Thanks and try your best.

Decline reason:

This unblock request is nonsense. It's unclear to me if you don't understand how IP addresses work, how Wikipedia works, or are deliberately attempting to waste our time. Yamla (talk) 11:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

69.255.225.138 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not trying to waste my time. Although this IP is not blocked, I can't get rid of the Proxy IP. Can you please try to find a way to disable this IP back to the IP I have before? I disabled my proxy but nothing works.69.255.225.138 (talk) 11:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I'm not trying to waste my time. Although this IP is not blocked, I can't get rid of the Proxy IP. Can you please try to find a way to disable this IP back to the IP I have before? I disabled my proxy but nothing works.[[Special:Contributions/69.255.225.138|69.255.225.138]] ([[User talk:69.255.225.138#top|talk]]) 11:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm not trying to waste my time. Although this IP is not blocked, I can't get rid of the Proxy IP. Can you please try to find a way to disable this IP back to the IP I have before? I disabled my proxy but nothing works.[[Special:Contributions/69.255.225.138|69.255.225.138]] ([[User talk:69.255.225.138#top|talk]]) 11:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm not trying to waste my time. Although this IP is not blocked, I can't get rid of the Proxy IP. Can you please try to find a way to disable this IP back to the IP I have before? I disabled my proxy but nothing works.[[Special:Contributions/69.255.225.138|69.255.225.138]] ([[User talk:69.255.225.138#top|talk]]) 11:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Once you disable your proxy, it takes a full 24 hours for the block to clear. Please stop posting these unblock requests. We will not be getting rid of the block on the other IP address range. --Yamla (talk) 11:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

OK, I will wait. Does that mean I need to edit in another website for now until tomorrow?