LexCorp
Old User talk
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, LexCorp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Hi, welcome. The more the merrier on these {{Creationism}} pages... Alai 16:59, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks. I hope I can contribute to some pages but I won't be able to keep constant guard. First because the time it takes and secondly because it truly depress me to argue with irrational people like the creationist. Having said that I fully support your effort and that of the rest to keep the wikipedia as factual as possible, especially regarding to the distinction of scientific methodology vs irrational thinking (Which is very legit as long as it doesn't cross the line to rational thinking areas). --LexCorp 19:11, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Cesare Emiliani
You may find this article interesting. It gives an adbridge Bio of Cesare. askewmind 12:13, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
Feynman Lectures
Good edit! Looking back, I do remember it being called that now, and the addition of chapter topics is a useful addition. Now it just needs to be linked to the appropriate articles... Eric Herboso 01:54, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Update: Never mind -- you already took care of it. (c: Guess my browser was using a cached copy, and I didn't notice till now. (c; Eric Herboso 01:56, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
scientist re-stubbing
I'm trying to help you re-stubb all scientics at wikipedia. Askewmind 01:18, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
- See your Talk page. --LexCorp 01:51, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Created kinds edit
Now that we have Creation biology up and running, would you help out with Created kinds? It really helps to have a third person in these edit processes with User:Ungtss.
Thanks,
Joshuaschroeder 01:29, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I will try but I must warm you that I am about to change home and they are gonna cut my internet connection anytime now. So if I drop out of the scene you know what happened. It may take a long month to get connected in the new place.--LexCorp 01:47, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Creation science
Ummm the way the vote is going at the moment, I don't think even a change of vote to merge will do anything. Megan1967 09:40, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Yep, I am becoming more dissatisfied and disenchanted with the wikipedia project by the day. I do believe on the concept of a free unbias encyclopedia. But it is now my believe that the current policies and their aplications prevent that from been a real objective. A pity really. Futher more I have been recently reverted quite rudely for pointing out a possible flaw in the wikipedia. Episodes like that one do not help at all. A project that do not consider the criticism from its own users is not good at all.--LexCorp 09:56, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I've changed my vote to merge but the keeps still look like they're in front. It probably end up "no concensus" at best. Megan1967 11:34, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Current User talk
Large Hadron Collider is Science Collaboration of the Week
|
You voted for
Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia science article. |
Samsara (talk • contribs) 11:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Intelligent Design Talk
Could you please go here and give your opinion on my proposed change to the intelligent design article. Thanks! Bagginator 10:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:Scientist_stub.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Scientist_stub.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 22:59, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons
Hi! After seeing your work on Keep on the Shadowfell and Thunderspire Labyrinth, I was wondering if you'd be interested in joining the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative group of editors working to increase the quality of D&D articles. -Drilnoth (talk) 21:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Kidnapping of Princess Arelina, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Kidnapping of Princess Arelina. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)