Theroadislong

Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message .

Your draft article, Draft:Berlin Brands Group

H

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello Theroadislong,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello Theroadislong,

New Page Review queue December 2022

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

Hello Theroadislong,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp ^connect on IRC.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Maximiliano Rodríguez Vecino

Thanks for the suggestion. I solved the problem.

I send you greetings. Jose.mendibaleta (talk) 07:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

My first article Police Seva declined

Hi Theroadislong,

Thank you for reviewing my article. My article is declined due to the reason which is missing the neutral point of view and seems like a promotion. But my article is subject of public service application which is helping citizens. This is a worthy application which needs entry in Wikipedia it's a prestigious application of a State in India. The information I sourced from various news papers which I attached as references. Pls help me in publishing my article NadellaMou (talk) 09:08, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Biplab Halder

Hi Theroadislong,

I have edited the article and added another sources also now can you kindly review once and let me know. ChoudharySamrat (talk) 07:34, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Draft article about Medicover Fertility

Today I created an draft article about Medicover Fertility in India. The article is not meant to advertise or promote services, it just informs users that such an organization exists, and by virtue of its development we at Medicover thought it worthwhile to gather this information in one place, like Wikipedia. I would appreciate information on what I could do to get my article accepted. Thank you sincerely.

Regards,

Katarzyna Makarewicz Makarevka12 (talk) 10:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Nick Kyrgios entry. Paragraph Two.

Hi, I have tried to edit this entry by eliminating a very old opinion piece written for The New Yorker in 2015. It has been 'reverted' automatically via Rollback or Huggle without the reverter actually reading the piece. This is the extract: "Although Kyrgios has received praise for his perceived entertaining style of play, he is a controversial player whose matches have featured "epic displays of ranting, racquet-wrecking, and trash-talking". The opinion piece is called "NK, The Reluctant Rising Star". He is no longer 22 or a rising star. He is nearly 29 and his career is mostly over due to extensive sports injury. The first sentence (received praise for his perceived entertaining style of play) does not mention WHO has praised him (it was Roger Federer's coach saying Kyrgios was the most outstanding player to emerge since Federer himself) and 'perceived' indicated that Roger Federer's coach does not know what he is talking about. The 'epic displays of ranting' are a personal opinion of the writer who is not a tennis expert but is writing on behalf of a high society magazine that specialises in cartoon caricature. SO on many counts this entry gives a very poor impression of Wikipedia's ability to describe a player. You would be better to leave it out. Or to clarify who praised him, why, and indicate that he is no longer 22 but is an established and highly respected player on the tour. The 'epic rants and racquet smashes' apply to all players at a high level - they have been in evidence this entire year when Kyrgios has been absent - he is not exceptional. Would you please advise the reverter (Materials Scientist) that this section should be reviewed, replaced with a much more updated summary of Kyrgios's achievements, or eliminated. As it is, the sentence just looks ignorant and biased. A lot of the material further down is also supported only by online tabloids but I have given up trying to change them as they are reverted automatically now. This is a pity. SueoftheAntipodes (talk) 11:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

You need to gain consensus on the article talk page, not forum shop everyone, but content like "splits opinion like no other sportsman. Since he smashed his way to stardom in 2014 he has been making headlines for both his cocky brilliance and his bad behaviour" when in Wikipedia's voice is definitely not appropriate. Theroadislong (talk) 11:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Yes I understand that now. All of those phrases are quotes from a number of opinion pieces written this year by established sports writers. I didn't make them up as I am not a writer or public speaker. The opinion piece writer in The New Yorker who wrote 'epic displays of ranting, racquet-wrecking and trash-talking' was also writing for dramatic effect and caricature in line with The New Yorker. I have tried to get some sort of reply from the article talk page but the only action I have got is from Material Scientist who reverts my changes through Rollback or Huggle without reading them. The talk page people say, 'I am not a Kyrgios lover but...' which indicates that they will not support any positive improvements. The old quotes which relate to his early development as a player are no longer relevant. So Wikipedia appears irrelevant and out of touch.SueoftheAntipodes (talk) 12:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

DRAFT_ PAchakuti Mesa Tradition

Thank you for your reply, but I still don't understand what is not neutral about the language I've used? The resources are all verifiable, third party, legitimate sources. Please, please, please, I need some specific examples of how my language is not neutral and some specific examples of how to make it so. Please give me details and specifics. BrendaBerry13 (talk) 18:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

One example of totally inappropriate tone " It is a container of spirit, a soul-infused artifact of the material world, a living and dynamic pattern upon and with which practitioners can consciously do personal and planetary energy healing work" it is laughably non encyclopaedic. Theroadislong (talk) 18:21, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

@BrendaBerry13: I wouldn't call the sources "legitimate", quite the opposite, in fact. And the language is absolutely impenetrable jargon. Whatever this is, it isn't a viable draft for an encyclopaedia article. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Draft: Satish ray

hello,@Theroadislong create a new article of this draft:satish ray and add some reliable sources Creation07 (talk) 12:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

You appear to be a paid editor, why should I assist you? Theroadislong (talk) 12:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

sorry, bymistakely i choosen as paid editor Creation07 (talk) 12:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

can you please help me Creation07 (talk) 12:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Sorry but I have no knowledge or interest in Satish Ray, so can't help you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

I will provide you some articles about Satish Ray, and he is bollywood actor maybe that will helpful for you. But please help me to create article Creation07 (talk) 13:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

You state here [1] that you are a paid editor, I will NOT be helping you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

yes, but that was for Draft: Mukesh Chhabra not for Draft: Satish Ray Creation07 (talk) 13:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

E-mail?

Hello Theroadislong, I wanted to write e-mail to you, but it appears you haven't enabled it. If you're interested, please write to me. ◅ Sebastian Helm 🗨 12:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

SebastianHelm I prefer to keep communication on Wikipedia thanks. Theroadislong (talk) 12:59, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Request on 17:30:45, 24 October 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Thebastidge

• Thebastidge (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mt. St. Helens AVA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This article is modeled on and in line with other AVA pages in the state. There are sufficient references and resources to verify it.

There have been placeholders and notes about this proposed AVA for some time independently mentioned and updated in other AVA pages- specifically the Puget Sound AVA page comes to mind.

Thebastidge (talk) 17:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

It is extremely poorly sourced, I'm not sure which article you modelled it on but see other poor quality articles exist. Theroadislong (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

WUDS-LP

Hi, I'm unclear on what you are meaning when you say "NOT any sort of source" regarding the sources you removed. They are documents filed by the General Manager of WUDS-LP with the Federal Communications Commission, a US Government agency. US Government sources are some of the most reliable we use, so I'm also unclear on how it's not "a reliable independent one". Could you elaborate? Thanks...Neutralhomer • Talk • 19:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

It was a downloadable document which merely said "Silent Status Due to staffing difficulties the Station has been taken silent. We respectfully request 180 days in which to remain silent." It is a primary source and not acceptable. Theroadislong (talk) 19:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Yes, that was the second source, the first source showed the Request for Silent Authority of a Low Power FM Station Application completed form from the FCC. You will note the downloadable document link at the very bottom. If you would have looked a little further, you would see the secondary source was removed by an anon user. I have contacted that user, but they have yet to respond. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 19:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

But Facebook is not a reliable source? Theroadislong (talk) 19:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

I am aware of that, but Facebook can be used as a secondary or confirming source. There is some conflicting information, I believe, between the official Facebook page of the station and the FCC documents. Via a just completed Google search, I can actually toss the Facebook post and add a local newspaper source for the secondary. Which gives the first a LOT more weight. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 19:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Ok go ahead... I'm in the European Union so cannot see that source. Theroadislong (talk) 20:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Awesome, glad we worked that out. :) I'll be honest, I don't completely understand the EU thing with websites, but the Northern Virginia Daily is the newspaper. Take Care....Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Draft:SwitchBot

Thanks for your review! Could you please provide more specific details about the reasons for the disapproval? The added content in the first paragraph already indicates that the brand has a significant presence in the Japanese region. Is my wording not appropriate, or is there something else at issue? I would appreciate your guidance and assistance. I would like to understand the exact reasons. Thank you once again for your review. Your efforts are greatly appreciated!Draft:SwitchBot Ejajsheik23 (talk) 01:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Since the previous decline you appear to have added a press release, which is not independent and "obtaining certification for top sales in four product categories" (whatever that might be) is not a criteria for notability. See WP:NCORP. Theroadislong (talk) 06:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

hide.me VPN page

Qcne said that I can add more citations and that the article will be reviewed again although it is rejected. Can you please review it again because now it is full compliant with everything you asked me to do. VPNMage (talk) 07:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm afraid it is just blatant advertising and totally unacceptable also see WP:SOLUTIONS. Theroadislong (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Yeah right. VPNMage (talk) 09:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red - November 2023

Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289 Online events: New: Alphabet run I & J | Geofocus: Indian subcontinent | Women in Politics Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also Wikipedia Asian Month November Contest Tip of the month: When translating articles from another language Wikipedia, don't forget to include attribution in your first edit summary. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Draft that hasn't been reviewed yet

Draft in question: Draft:ACE 3000 110.175.62.4 (talk) 10:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

As stated on the draft, "This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,395 pending submissions waiting for review." 331dot (talk) 10:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

BookishReader

The BookishReader user reverted your edit on that Abdul Karim Solangi article saying it passes WP:SIGCOV, I don't know if I am the one who is confused, or the subject just doesn't pass. They probably have a COI, but I don't want to be the one to tell them that. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

• Hi Theroadislong, I appreciate your work as well. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces, there is no COI. I just contribute to Wikipedia on missing arts and culture topics related to my country of birth, like you. BookishReader (talk) 18:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Mukesh Chhabra

Hi Mukesh Chhabra's Wikipedia page was earlier in the article space, he is one of the renowned name in Indian Film Industry, what verification do you need to look for to shift this page from draft to Article please let me know. Please look at these links for verification:

https://www.koimoi.com/bollywood-news/mukesh-chhabra-on-welcoming-new-talent-in-bollywood-it-will-strengthen-our-work-culture-cinema/

https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/casting-director-mukesh-chhabra-aspiring-actors-advice-6342106/

https://www.koimoi.com/bollywood-news/mukesh-chhabra-on-83-it-took-me-more-than-a-year-to-cast/

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2535507/

https://timesofindia-indiatimes-com.translate.goog/topic/Mukesh-Chhabra/news?from=mdr&_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=hi&_x_tr_hl=hi&_x_tr_pto=tc

https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/mukesh-chhabra-says-there-were-fights-between-him-and-atlee-for-the-first-two-months-over-casting-for-jawan-it-was-very-difficult-8992434/ Iamrohj (talk) 08:33, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

This is a WP:SPA, possibly a sock. Problematic paid editing disclosure is still an issue. The editor appears to have ignored all the comments on the draft about reliable sources too. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Regarding article Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Jalpaiguri

@Theroadislong,

Guide me regarding WP:NSCHOOL, what should be the reliable source for JNVs of NVS. There are 661 JNVs are there and only some of the article have been created. So, that I can contribute something about this. As per my knowledge, official website of NVS can be consider as reliable source. Thank you Mr. Rasel Hasan (talk) 09:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Not remotely clear what makes them notable?

Hello Theroadislong, i appreciate your comment, you asked what makes them notable?? well the person in subject is highly notable. I am developing the page gradually..but kindly understand the person is notable. all citations are independent sources and secondarily reliable. You declined the article without checking the citations. I commend you for that! Brogonee (talk) 16:07, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

I DID check the sources, the first one for instance [2] makes no mention of the topic. Theroadislong (talk) 16:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

@Theroadislong, my article got rejected...i have updated the article with proper citations...kindly check the article Bala Sanusi Turaki. Thanks! Brogonee (talk) 16:51, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Rejection means it won't be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 17:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

The Recent Changes Barnstar

		The Recent Changes Barnstar
		For your excellent contribution in recent change patrol. Mr. Rasel Hasan (talk) 17:03, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you but it's not clear why this has been awarded, I am not a particularly active recent changes patroller? Theroadislong (talk) 17:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Theroadislong:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Moritake Kimura

For other reliable sources you can see here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.13.89.71 (talk) 08:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

They are of no use to your draft there? Theroadislong (talk) 08:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Some of them are about Moritake and his career. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.13.89.71 (talk) 08:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Then please add them to the draft. Theroadislong (talk) 08:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

I don't have time, then can you help me reading them and adding them to the draft? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.13.89.71 (talk) 08:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for Moritake Kimura, but don't forget to edit his ja.wikipedia. Can you do also Draft:Yellow Fangs, Draft:Heikichi Yamamoto, Draft:Mika Muramatsu? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.13.89.71 (talk) 08:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Sorry but I don't read Japanese. Theroadislong (talk) 09:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you for Yellow Fangs. Can you do also the last two? Other reliable sources for Yamamoto are in the same for Moritake Kimura in the talk page of that incident. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.13.89.71 (talk) 09:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Mika Muramatsu has not been submitted and doesn't appear to be notable and same with Draft:Heikichi Yamamoto. Theroadislong (talk) 09:36, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Mika Muramatsu is a famous Japanese actress, and Heikichi Yamamoto the most famous matagi in that period. The first can wait (maybe you can search other reliable sources), but the last I think it's sufficient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.13.89.71 (talk) 09:38, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Being "famous" is not one of the criteria at WP:NACTOR. Theroadislong (talk) 09:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

But Yamamoto's voice seems good just like those of Moritake Kimura and Haruyoshi Okawa. 87.13.89.71 (talk) 10:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Can you do Yamamoto? 87.13.89.71 (talk) 12:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

I declined Draft:Heikichi Yamamoto you re-submitted with zero changes, which is pointless and diesruptive. Theroadislong (talk) 12:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

I've added External links for Yamamoto, then can you do it? 87.13.89.71 (talk) 13:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

External links do not contribute towardsnotability, please slow down and perhaps read WP:YFA. Theroadislong (talk) 13

13, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

He is notabily just like Haruyoshi Okawa, then... 87.13.89.71 (talk) 13:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

I've added those sources for Yamamoto. 95.234.110.185 (talk) 10:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

With those reliable sources, can you do it? 193.207.146.130 (talk) 22:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

I'm waiting. Can you do it? 95.239.125.208 (talk) 10:21, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

I am NOT your servant, I will leave the draft for another reviewer, please stop harassing me. Theroadislong (talk) 10:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Ok, sorry. 95.239.125.208 (talk) 10:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft: William John Titus Bishop

Hi Theroadislong,

Thanks for reviewing my draft! With all due respect to yourself, I think that the article fulfils a number of the criteria that you mention for Wikipedia:NSINGER including having released a number of albums on a major label. This would not have been in a previous article as it has occurred, along with more general career progression, since the previous one was written. Would it perhaps be better to make this more explicit in the article itself before re-submitting?

All good things Topg1985 (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi Theroadislong,

I have improved the article by expanding it and adding further references as per your advice! Thanks again for reviewing the draft! Topg1985 (talk) 15:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deborah Shaffer has been accepted

Deborah Shaffer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 22:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

How I can add an article

Hi dear;

I just finished the translation of an Article the The Arabic to English, But I dont know how to publish.

Can you Help me, Please مصطفى ملو (talk) 11:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

There is no content in your sandbox here User:مصطفى ملو/sandbox? Theroadislong (talk) 11:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Regarding a Quary

@Theroadislong, Hope all are good. I would like to know something about Orphan page. What does it means in context of a article? Thank you in anticipation. Mr. Rasel Hasan (talk) 14:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Mr. Rasel Hasan It means that no other Wikipedia article contains a link to it. Theroadislong (talk) 14:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for guidance, if you free can you check Maheshwar, Cooch Behar is now orphan or not? Again thanks a lot for guiding. Mr. Rasel Hasan (talk) 15:00, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

I need an infobox

Dear friend;

I need an infobox for a geological site to add to my article.

Please, can you help me?!! مصطفى ملو (talk) 14:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

مصطفى ملو Info boxes aren't really needed and I generally avoid them but you could use one from here maybe [[3]]? Theroadislong (talk) 14:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks مصطفى ملو (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your comment on draft of Simon Rosenthal bio...

is absolutely fair. I'm editing the piece to address the issue. Thank you! Emily Brewton (talk) 14:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

WLC Revert

Thanks for catching that, my eye didn't notice the cropping. I thought it was just the name change to the German. Squatch347 (talk) 14:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Squatch347 Yes I think it was improved by the cropping, but poor naming of the file. Theroadislong (talk) 14:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Mak Hubjer Draft Page

Hi,

I just got your message regarding the drafted article Mak Hubjer. As mentioned in refusal, it says that article does not represent or stands for a notable person, as dough I have referenced number of independent reliable sources for this person.

If that does not stand, could you please tell me what are the next steps and how can I improve this? 185.38.145.19 (talk) 17:18, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

You need to show how he passes the criteria at WP:NARTIST and it needs to be re-written in a dry neutral encyclopaedic tone. Theroadislong (talk) 17:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Ellis Ehijator Abraham

Submission rejected on 1 November 2023 by Theroadislong (talk).

This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Please what do I need to do to make it accepted. ReneOliver23 (talk) 13:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

There is nothing you can do it has been rejected and won’t be considered further, the topic is not notable.Theroadislong (talk) 13:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Page Changes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gakon_Netafim Hallo, this was to commercial - however added new citations, and unique accomplishments. What other changes to do you recommend? Internetsleuth (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Holymoorside Boundary Stones

Hi, My submission has been rejected due to a lack of notable citations. I can understand this to an extent as the subject matter may be considered 'local' - it is a series of stones. I have submitted references but they are, in turn, also local. I am not sure what else I can add to this without referring my own work, which I realise is not acceptable. Without any further suggestions to make this possible I was wondering if - as the stones already have a mention on another wikipedia page - it would be possible for a shorter version would be acceptable as a section edited in on that other page? many thanks. Bardofel1 (talk) 22:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

That sounds like a good plan until such time as more sources become available. Theroadislong (talk) 22:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks - I will try that. Bardofel1 (talk) 23:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

An apology

I just want to offer my sincere apology. Because I thought it will be upgrading the draft article of the Governor of the Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority Georgios Dritsakos and be update to a new articles with reference. I'm sorry. 108.21.67.83 (talk) 16:01, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

I fail to understand what you are apologising for? Your draft Draft:Georgios Dritsakos is waiting to be submitted by you, I added the code to allow you to do this. Theroadislong (talk) 16:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your commentary. 108.21.67.83 (talk) 17:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Helpful to learn

I was going to hold on my draft of Georgios Dritsakos and wait to get an update. I mistakenly thought to have it redirect. Forgive me. 108.21.67.83 (talk) 16:12, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Jay and Joss

Good morning. Thank you for finalising the review of Jay and Joss. Would it be possible to rename the page to Jay & Joss? The ampersand is used in their stage name. Thanks again. - Dave Crosby (talk) 08:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

• That was fast, thank you. We have a comma on the end though... - Dave Crosby (talk) 08:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC)