Clement of Rome (Latin: Clemens Romanus; Ancient Greek: Κλήμης Ῥώμης, romanizedKlēmēs Rōmēs; died c. 100 AD), also known as Pope Clement I, was the bishop of Rome in the late first century AD. He is considered to be the first of the Apostolic Fathers of the Church,[2] and a leading member of the Church in Rome in the late 1st century.


Clement I
Bishop of Rome
c. 1000 portrayal at Saint Sophia's Cathedral, Kyiv
ChurchEarly Church
Papacy beganc. 92 AD
Papacy endedc. 100 AD
PredecessorAnacletus
SuccessorEvaristus
Orders
Consecrationby Saint Peter
Personal details
Born
Diedc. 100 AD
Chersonesus,
Taurica, Bosporan Kingdom
Sainthood
Feast day
Venerated in
Attributes
Patronage
ShrinesBasilica di San Clemente, Rome
Church of St Clement, Nantes
St Clement's Church, Moscow
Diocesan Shrine and Parish of St. Clement, Angono, Rizal, Philippines
Other popes named Clement

Little is known about Clement's life. Tertullian claimed that Clement was ordained by Saint Peter.[3] Early church lists place him as the second or third [4][a] bishop of Rome. Eusebius, in his book Church History mentioned Clement as the third bishop of Rome and as the "co-laborer" of Paul.[5] In Against Heresies, Irenaeus describes Clement as the successor to Anacletus (third bishop of Rome), and a personal acquaintance of the Apostles.[6] According to the Annuario Pontificio, Clement was the fourth bishop of Rome, holding office at the very end of the 1st century.[b] It is likely that Clement died in exile, and was possibly martyred. According to apocryphal stories dating back to the 4th century by authors such as Rufinus, Clement was imprisoned by Roman Emperor Trajan, and was executed by being tied to an anchor and thrown into the sea.[2][18] The Liber Pontificalis states that Clement died in Greece in the third year of Trajan's reign, or 100 AD.

The only known genuine extant writing of Clement is his letter to the church at Corinth (1 Clement) in response to a dispute in which certain presbyters of the Corinthian church had been deposed.[4] He asserted the authority of the presbyters as rulers of the church because they had been appointed by the Apostles.[4] His letter, which is one of the oldest extant Christian documents outside the New Testament, was read in the church at Corinth, along with other epistles, some of which later became part of the Christian canon. This letter is considered to be the earliest affirmation of the principle of apostolic succession. A second epistle, 2 Clement, was once controversially attributed to Clement, although recent scholarship suggests it to be a homily by another author.[4] In the pseudo-Clementine Writings, Clement is the intermediary through whom the apostles teach the church.[4]

Clement is recognized as a saint in many Christian churches and a patron saint of mariners. He is commemorated on 23 November in the Catholic Church, the Anglican Communion, and the Lutheran Church. In Eastern Orthodox Christianity his feast is kept on 25 November.[19]

Life

edit
 
11th-century fresco in the Basilica of San Clemente, Rome: Saints Cyril and Methodius bring Saint Clement's relics to Rome

The Liber Pontificalis[20] presents a list that makes Linus the second in the line of bishops of Rome, with Peter as first; but at the same time it states that Peter ordained two bishops, Linus and Anacletus, for the priestly service of the community, devoting himself instead to prayer and preaching, and that it was to Clement that he entrusted the Church as a whole, appointing him as his successor. Tertullian considered Clement to be the immediate successor of Peter.[21] In one of his works, Jerome listed Clement as "the fourth bishop of Rome after Peter, if indeed the second was Linus and the third Anacletus, although most of the Latins think that Clement was second after the apostle."[22] Clement is put after Linus and Cletus/Anacletus in the earliest (c. 180) account, that of Irenaeus,[23] who is followed by Eusebius of Caesarea.[24]

Early succession lists name Clement as the first,[25]: 636 [c] second, or third[4][d] successor of Peter. However, the meaning of his inclusion in these lists has been very controversial.[26] Some believe there were presbyter-bishops as early as the 1st century,[26] but that there is no evidence for a monarchical episcopacy in Rome at such an early date.[4] There is also, however, no evidence of a change occurring in ecclesiastical organization in the latter half of the 2nd century, which would indicate that a new or newly-monarchical episcopacy was establishing itself.[26]

A tradition that began in the 3rd and 4th century,[4] has identified him as the Clement that Paul mentioned in Philippians 4:3, a fellow laborer in Christ.[e] While in the mid-19th century it was customary to identify him as a freedman of Titus Flavius Clemens, who was consul with his cousin, the Emperor Domitian, this identification, which no ancient sources suggest, afterwards lost support.[2] The 2nd-century Shepherd of Hermas mentions a Clement whose office it was to communicate with other churches; most likely, this is a reference to Clement I.[27]

A large congregation existed in Rome c. 58, when Paul wrote his Epistle to the Romans.[4] Paul arrived in Rome c. 60 (Acts).[4] Paul and Peter were said to have been martyred there. Nero persecuted Roman Christians after Rome burned in 64, and the congregation may have suffered further persecution under Domitian (81–96). Clement was the first of early Rome's most notable bishops.[28] The Liber Pontificalis, which documents the reigns of popes, states that Clement had known Peter.

Clement is known for his epistle to the church in Corinth (c. 96), in which he asserts the apostolic authority of the bishops/presbyters as rulers of the church.[4] The epistle mentions episkopoi (overseers, bishops) or presbyteroi (elders, presbyters) as the upper class of minister, served by the deacons, but, since it does not mention himself, it gives no indication of the title or titles used for Clement in Rome.

 
Martyrdom of St Clement by Fungai

Death and legends of final days

edit

According to apocryphal acta dating to the 4th century at earliest, Clement was banished from Rome to the Chersonesus during the reign of the Emperor Trajan[4][2] and was set to work in a stone quarry. Finding on his arrival that the prisoners were suffering from lack of water, he knelt down in prayer. Looking up, he saw a lamb on a hill, went to where the lamb had stood and struck the ground with his pickaxe, releasing a gushing stream of clear water. This miracle resulted in the conversion of large numbers of the local pagans and his fellow prisoners to Christianity. As punishment, Clement was martyred by being tied to an anchor[29] and thrown from a boat into the Black Sea. The legend recounts that every year a miraculous ebbing of the sea revealed a divinely built shrine containing his bones. However, the oldest sources on Clement's life, Eusebius and Jerome, note nothing of his martyrdom.[25]: 639 

The Inkerman Cave Monastery marks the supposed place of Clement's burial in Crimea. A year or two before his own death in 869, Cyril brought to Rome what he believed to be the relics of Clement, bones he found in Crimea buried with an anchor on dry land. They are now enshrined in the Basilica di San Clemente.[2] But there are also other traditions[30] about an ancient veneration of the relics in Chersonesus and the translation of the head to Kyiv. Other relics of Clement, including his head, are claimed by the Kyiv Monastery of the Caves in Ukraine.

Writings

edit

The Liber Pontificalis states that Clement wrote two letters (though the second letter, 2 Clement, is no longer ascribed to him by many modern scholars).[4][2][31]

Epistle of Clement

edit

Clement's only extant, uncontested text is a letter to the Christian congregation in Corinth, often called the First Epistle of Clement or 1 Clement. The history of 1 Clement clearly and continuously shows Clement as the author of this letter. It is considered the earliest authentic Christian document outside the New Testament.

Clement writes to the troubled congregation in Corinth, where certain "presbyters" or "bishops" have been deposed (the class of clergy above that of deacons is argued by certain historians to be designated indifferently by the two terms).[4] Clement calls for repentance and reinstatement of those who have been deposed, in line with maintenance of order and obedience to church authority, since the apostles established the ministry of "bishops and deacons."[4] He mentions "offering the gifts" as one of the functions of the higher class of clergy.[4] The epistle offers valuable insight into Church ministry at that time and into the history of the Roman Church.[4] It was highly regarded, and was read in church at Corinth along with the Scriptures c. 170.[4]

We should be obedient unto God, rather than follow those who in arrogance and unruliness have set themselves up as leaders in abominable jealousy.... For Christ is with them that are lowly of mind, not with them that exalt themselves over the flock.

— Clement of Rome 1885b, 1 Clem 14:1; 16:1

Do we then think it to be a great and marvelous thing, if the Creator of the universe shall bring about the resurrection of them that have served Him with holiness in the assurance of a good faith, seeing that He showeth to us even by a bird the magnificence of His promise?

— Clement of Rome 1885b, 1 Clem 26:1

In the epistle, it is argued by some that Clement uses the terms "bishop" and "presbyter" interchangeably for the higher order of ministers above deacons.[4] In some congregations, particularly in Egypt, the distinction between bishops and presbyters seems to have become established only later.[32] But by the middle of the second century all the leading Christian centres had bishops.[32] Scholars such as Bart Ehrman treat as significant the fact that, of the seven letters written by Ignatius of Antioch to seven Christian churches shortly after the time of Clement, the only one that does not present the church as headed by a single bishop is that addressed to the church in Rome, although this letter did not refer to a collective priesthood either.[33]

Clement's letter also contains historical references, it mentions persecutions of Christians, records the martyrdom of the Apostle Peter and suggests that the apostle Paul traveled to Spain.[2]

Theology

edit
 
Clement of Rome

Clement's view on justification has had much scholarly discussion, as he is sometimes argued to have believed sola fide, though others believe him as having synergist views. Debate exists, because Clement directly stated that "we are not justified by ourselves but by faith", however in other places of the letter, he stresses judgement on sin.[34] The Protestant scholar Tom Schreiner argued that Clement of Rome believed in a grace oriented justification by faith, which will cause the believer to do works as a result,[35] Philip Schaff also said that Clement probably taught a faith alone doctrine[36] while Catholic Encyclopedia wrote that Clement believed works to be part of justification.[2] Rudolf Knopf and Rudolf Bultmann also believed that Clement believed in synergism, and that the believer needs to cooperate with the grace of God to be saved. Rudolf Knopf in his commentary on the letter of Clement to the Corinthians stated that: "Pre-Christian sins are wiped out by baptism. For those sins that follow, a person must have faith in divine mercy and, at the same time, that person must exhibit his or her own good deeds, apart from which the person cannot be saved"[34] David Downs argued against the view that Clement of Rome holds synergist views, he argued that Clement did not write a letter about deep soteriology, but instead to provide moral guidance to the Corinthians, David Downs stated "According to the soteriological economy of Clement everything rests on the goodness, mercy, and election of the Creator, which have befitted the 'chosen portion' through Jesus".[34]

Thomas Schreiner argued that Clement taught that faith was enough to be saved because of 1 Clement 32:4 where he stated:[37]

And so we, having been called through His will in Christ Jesus, are not justified through ourselves or through our own wisdom or understanding or piety or works which we wrought in holiness of heart, but through faith, whereby the Almighty God justified all men that have been from the beginning; to whom be the glory for ever and ever. Amen. (1 Clement 32:4)[37]

The epistle has been cited as the first work to establish Roman primacy, because he wrote to settle a problem in the church,[38] but most scholars see the epistle as more fraternal than authoritative,[f] and Orthodox scholar John Meyendorff sees it as connected with the Roman church's awareness of its "priority" (rather than "primacy") among local churches.[39] It has also been argued by Dave Armstrong, that Clement supported Papal Infallibility in Letter to the Corinthians 1, 63. Because of him speaking of the Corinthians to "being obedient" to the things he has "written through the Holy Spirit" in order to correct and "root out the wicked passion of jealousy".[40][41]

It has also been argued that the epistle may contain early evidence for belief in universal salvation.[42]

According to Catholic Encyclopedia, the letter of Clement has Trinitarian theology and Christ is frequently called as the high priest by him.[2]

Writings formerly attributed to Clement

edit
 
Saint Clement, by Tiepolo

Second Epistle of Clement

edit

The Second Epistle of Clement is a homily, or sermon, likely written in Corinth or Rome, but not by Clement.[4] Early Christian congregations often shared homilies to be read. The homily describes Christian character and repentance.[4] It is possible that the Church from which Clement sent his epistle had included a festal homily to share in one economical post, thus the homily became known as the Second Epistle of Clement.

While 2 Clement has been traditionally ascribed to Clement, most scholars believe that 2 Clement was written in the 2nd century based on the doctrinal themes of the text and a near match between words in 2 Clement and in the Greek Gospel of the Egyptians.[2][31] Doubts about the authorship were already expressed in antiquity by Eusebius and Jerome.[43][44]

Epistles on Virginity

edit

Two "Epistles on Virginity" were traditionally attributed to Clement, but now there exists almost universal consensus that Clement was not the author of those two epistles.[45]

False Decretals

edit

A 9th-century collection of church legislation known as the False Decretals, which was once attributed to Isidore of Seville, is largely composed of forgeries. All of what it presents as letters of pre-Nicene popes, beginning with Clement, are forgeries, as are some of the documents that it attributes to councils;[g] and more than forty falsifications are found in the decretals that it gives as those of post-Nicene popes from Sylvester I (314–335) to Gregory II (715–731). The False Decretals were part of a series of falsifications of past legislation by a party in the Carolingian Empire whose principal aim was to free the church and the bishops from interference by the state and the metropolitan archbishops respectively.[46][47][48]

Clement is included among other early Christian popes as authors of the Pseudo-Isidoran (or False) Decretals, a 9th-century forgery. These decrees and letters portray even the early popes as claiming absolute and universal authority.[h] Clement is the earliest pope to whom a Pseudo-Isidoran text is attributed.

Clementine literature

edit

Clement is also the hero of an early Christian romance or novel that has survived in at least two different versions, known as the Clementine literature, where he is identified with Emperor Domitian's cousin Titus Flavius Clemens. Clementine literature portrays Clement as the Apostles' means of disseminating their teachings to the Church.[4]

Recognition as a saint

edit
 
St. Clement is one of the few Roman popes to have a Russian Orthodox church dedicated in his name.

Clement's name is in the Roman Canon of the Mass. He is commemorated on 23 November as a pope and martyr in the Catholic Church as well as within the Anglican Communion and the Lutheran Church. The Syriac Orthodox Church, the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, the Macedonian Orthodox Church and the Greek Orthodox Church, as well as the Syriac Catholic Church, the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church and all Byzantine Rite Eastern Catholic Churches commemorate Clement of Rome (called in Syriac "Mor Clemis") on 24 November; the Russian Orthodox Church commemorates Clement on 25 November. Clement is honored in the Church of England and in the Episcopal Church on 23 November.[49][50]

The St Clement's Church in Moscow is renowned for its glittering Baroque interior and iconostasis, as well as a set of gilded 18th-century railings. The parish was disbanded in 1934 and the original free-standing gate was demolished. The Lenin State Library stored its books in the building throughout the Soviet period. It was not until 2008 that the building reverted to the Russian Orthodox Church.

Clement of Rome is commemorated in the Synaxarium of the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria on the 29th of the month of Hatour [25 November (Julian) – equivalent to 8 December (Gregorian) due to the current 13-day Julian–Gregorian Calendar offset]. According to the Coptic Church Synaxarium, he suffered martyrdom in AD 100 during the reign of Emperor Trajan (98–117). He was martyred by tying his neck to an anchor and casting him into the sea. The record of the 29th of the Coptic month of Hatour states that this saint was born in Rome to an honorable father whose name was Fostinus and also states that he was a member of the Roman senate and that his father educated him and taught him Greek literature.

Relics

edit

Besides relics venerated in Rome and Kyiv (see above), in the city of Santa Cruz de Tenerife in Spain, the shinbone of Clement is kept. It was a gift of Sidotti, Patriarch of Antioch, to the Church of the Immaculate Conception. Historically, this was a highly revered relic in the city.[51]

Symbolism

edit
 
Anchored Cross, also known as Mariner's or Saint Clement's cross.

In workings of art, Clement can be recognized by having an anchor at his side or tied to his neck. He is most often depicted wearing papal vestments, including the pallium, and sometimes with a papal tiara but more often with a mitre. He is also sometimes shown with papal symbols such as the papal cross and the Keys of Heaven. In reference to his martyrdom, he often holds the palm of martyrdom.

Clement can be seen depicted near a fountain or spring, relating to the incident from his hagiography, or lying in a temple in the sea. The Anchored Cross or Mariner's Cross is also referred to as St. Clement's Cross, in reference to the way he was martyred.[29]

See also

edit

References

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Campbell 1907 details the debate regarding whether there was one pope with two names, or two distinct popes. Ancient sources are contradictory, and modern scholarship is divided.
  2. ^ The 2008 Annuario pontificio gives the dates as either 92–99 or 68–76.[7] However, the 2012 edition settles for 92 as the beginning date,[8] following Eusebius and Jerome.[9][10] The date of 68–76 is given by the later Catalogus Liberianus and Liber Pontificalis, which are not trustworthy for the chronology of the first popes. All four sources give Peter an episcopate of 25 years in Rome, and the Liber Pontificalis even records that Peter died 38 years after Jesus' death, that is, AD 67–68.[11][12][13][14] However, the Catalogus and Liber counted Peter's episcopate from AD 30 and thus arrived to AD 55, as Pope Linus is said to have succeeded in AD 56. The author thus "gives two incompatible traditions."[15] The year of Clement's death is disputed, it was AD 99 according to Jerome[16] and AD 100 according to Eusebius[17] (and the Liber Pontificalis, despite previously stating that his tenure ended in AD 76).[14] All four sources give him a tenure of 9 years, which would place his death in AD 100/101.
  3. ^ Like Schaff, the Holy See's Annuario Pontificio, gives Clement as "supreme pontiff of Rome" in either 92–99 or 68–76, making him either the first or the third successor of Saint Peter, but not the second.(Libreria Editrice Vaticana 2008, p. 7)
  4. ^ The Catholic Encyclopedia article says that only on the false assumption that "Cletus" and "Anacletus" were two distinct persons, instead of variations of the name of single individual, did some think that Clement was the fourth successor of Saint Peter.
  5. ^ Kelly & Walsh 2005, p. 7 note that "Writers of the 3rd and 4th centuries, like Origen, Eusebius, and Jerome, equate him (St. Clement I), perhaps, correctly, with the Clement whom St. Paul mentions (Phil 4:3) as a fellow worker."
  6. ^ Phan 2000, p. 32 writes, "Most scholars would now regard 1 Clement as an impressive example of fraternal correction rather than an authoritative intervention."
  7. ^ The Encyclopædia Britannica places the Donation of Constantine in this section; the Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church places it in the section of the pre-Nicene Popes.
  8. ^ Durant 2011, p. 525 writes, "These early documents were designed to show that by the oldest traditions and practice of the Church no bishop might be deposed, no Church councils might be convened, and no major issue might be decided, without the consent of the pope. Even the early pontiffs, by these evidences, had claimed absolute and universal authority as vicars of Christ on Earth."

Citations

edit
  1. ^ "Patron Saints and their feast days". Pamphlets. AU. Archived from the original on 22 June 2015. Retrieved 15 June 2015.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Chapman, Henry Palmer (1908). "Pope St. Clement I" . Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 4.
  3. ^ Tertullian (1722) [ca 199]. "32". De Praescriptione Haereticorum [Tertullian's Prescription Against Heretics]. Translated by Betty, Joseph. Oxford: The Theatre. The Church of Smyrna produceth her Polycarp placed there by St. John; The Church of Rome has her Clemens placed there by St. Peter…
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v Cross, Frank Leslie; Livingstone, Elizabeth A. (2005). "Clement of Rome, St". The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford University Press. p. 363. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3.
  5. ^ Roberts, Alexander; Donaldson, James (1885). "Church History of Eusebius, Book III, Chapter IV, 10". Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. II. Vol. I (1st ed.). Wikisource.
  6. ^ Irenaeus. "Book III, Chapter 3". Ante-Nicene Fathers. Vol. I. Wikisource.
  7. ^ Libreria Editrice Vaticana 2008, p. 7.
  8. ^ ""Pope St Anacletus, Martyr". The Brighton Oratory, July 13, 2012. 13 July 2012.
  9. ^ Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, VIII, 15. "In the twelfth year of (Domitian) Clement succeeded Anencletus after the latter had been bishop of the church of Rome for twelve years."
  10. ^ Jerome, Chronicon, AD 92, 12th of Domitian: "Clement presided as the 3rd bishop of the Church of Rome for nine years."
  11. ^ Jerome. "De Viris Illustribus" [On Illustrious Men]. Fathers. New advent. Retrieved 5 June 2015.
  12. ^ Jerome, Chronicon, AD 42, AD 68."
  13. ^ Liberian Catalogue
  14. ^ a b Liber Pontificalis, The Latin library.
  15. ^ Loomis, Louise Ropes (2006) [1917]. The Book of the Popes (Liber Pontificalis). Arx Publishing. p. 4ff, note 3. ISBN 978-1-889758-86-2 – via Google books.
  16. ^ Chronicon AD 99, 2nd year of Trajan. "Evaristus received the 4th episcopate of the Roman church."
  17. ^ Ecclesiastical History, CCEL VIII, 34. "In the third year of the reign of the emperor mentioned above, Clement committed the episcopal government of the church of Rome to Evarestus, and departed this life after he had superintended the teaching of the divine word nine years in all…" In Bk. IV. chap. 1, Eusebius gives eight years as the duration of Evarestus’ episcopate. The truth is, as the monarchical episcopate was not yet existing in Rome, it is useless to attempt to fix his dates, or those of any of the other so-called bishops who lived before the second quarter of the second century.
  18. ^ Tyrannius Rufinus (2024) [406]. "The Martyrdom of Clement - an English Translation". Early Church Texts. Retrieved 30 May 2024.
  19. ^ "Hieromartyr Clement, Pope of Rome". The Orthodox Church in America. 2024. Retrieved 30 May 2024.
  20. ^ Loomis, Louise Ropes (1916). The Book of the Popes (Liber Pontificalis). New York: Columbia University Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-889758-86-2.
  21. ^ Tertullian (1903). "Prescription against Heretics". In Alexander Roberts; James Donaldson (eds.). The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers Down to A.D. 325. Vol. III, Part II, Section I, Ch XXXII. C. Scribner's Sons. p. 258.
  22. ^ Jerome (1885). Alexander Roberts; James Donaldson (eds.). "Lives of Illustrious Men, Ch XV Clemens the bishop" . Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II. Vol. III – via Wikisource.
  23. ^ Irenaeus (1885). Alexander Roberts; James Donaldson (eds.). "Against Heresies, Book III, Ch. III" . Ante-Nicene Fathers. Vol. I – via Wikisource.
  24. ^ Eusebius of Caesarea (1885). Alexander Roberts; James Donaldson (eds.). "Church History of Eusebius, Book III, Chapter 4, paragraph 10" . Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II. Vol. I – via Wikisource.
  25. ^ a b Schaff, Philip (1883). "Ch XIII, §162 Clement of Rome.". History of the Christian Church. Vol. II: Ante-Nicene Christianity. A.D. 100-325. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
  26. ^ a b c Van Hove, Alphonse (1907). "Bishop" . In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 2. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  27. ^ "Vision II", 4. 3
  28. ^ Cross, Frank Leslie; Livingstone, Elizabeth A. (2005). "Rome (early Christian)". The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford University Press. p. 1422. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3.
  29. ^ a b Stracke, Richard (2015-10-20). "Saint Clement: The Iconography". Christian Iconography.
  30. ^ Bernhard Gallistl: 'Klemens von Rom und sein Kult auf der Krim'. In: Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft. NF, vol.45, 2021, pp. 101–143.
  31. ^ a b McBrien (2000). Lives of the Popes. HarperCollins. p. 35.
  32. ^ a b Cross, Frank Leslie; Livingstone, Elizabeth A. (2005). "bishop". The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford University Press. p. 210. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3.
  33. ^ Ehrman, Bart D (2008). Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene: The Followers of Jesus in History and Legend. Oxford University Press. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-19-534350-2.
  34. ^ a b c Downs, David J. (2013). "Justification, Good Works, and Creation in Clement of Rome's Appropriation of Romans 5–6". New Testament Studies. 59 (3): 415–432. doi:10.1017/S0028688513000040. ISSN 0028-6885. S2CID 170840708.
  35. ^ "Did the Early Church Teach 'Faith Alone'?". Zondervan Academic. Retrieved 2021-12-31.
  36. ^ "Philip Schaff: History of the Christian Church, Volume II: Ante-Nicene Christianity. A.D. 100-325 - Christian Classics Ethereal Library". www.ccel.org. Retrieved 2022-01-21.
  37. ^ a b Schreiner, Thomas R. (2015-09-15). Faith Alone---The Doctrine of Justification: What the Reformers Taught...and Why It Still Matters. Zondervan Academic. ISBN 978-0-310-51579-1.
  38. ^ Mirus, Jeffrey. "...and Protects His Church from Teaching Error in Faith and Morals'". www.ewtn.com/. Eternal Word Television Network. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
  39. ^ John Meyendorff (1992). The Primacy of Peter: Essays in Ecclesiology and the Early Church. 135-136. St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 978-0-88141-125-6.
  40. ^ "Christians Have Always Recognized the Pope's Authority — Here's Proof From the 1st Century". National Catholic Register. 18 Sep 2021. Retrieved 6 January 2022. Clement definitely asserts his authority over the Corinthian church far away… That is extraordinary, and very similar to what we see in the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15:28 ("For it has seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things") and in Scripture itself… infallibility (divine protection from error and the pope as a unique representative of God).
  41. ^ "Authority of the Pope". www.churchfathers.org/. Church Fathers Organization. Retrieved 6 January 2022. You will afford us joy and gladness if being obedient to the things which we have written through the Holy Spirit, you will root out the wicked passion of jealousy
  42. ^ Cf. Downs, "Justification, Good Works, and Creation in Clement of Rome's Appropriation of Romans 5–6," in New Testament Studies.
  43. ^ Eusebius Pamphilius 325. Book 3, Chapter 16.
  44. ^ Jerome, De Viris Illustribus, Chapter 15
  45. ^ Clement of Rome (1885). "Ch. XXX Two Epistles Concerning Virginity: Introductory Notice.". The Ante-Nicene Fathers : translations of the writings of the Fathers down to A.D. 325. Vol. VIII. Buffalo: C.L. Pub. Co. p. 53.
  46. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica: False Decretals
  47. ^ Bunson 2004, p. 345.
  48. ^ Cross, Frank Leslie; Livingstone, Elizabeth A. (2005). "False Decretals". The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford University Press. p. 601. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3.
  49. ^ "The Calendar". The Church of England. Retrieved 2021-03-27.
  50. ^ Lesser Feasts and Fasts 2018. Church Publishing, Inc. 2019-12-17. ISBN 978-1-64065-235-4.
  51. ^ González 2007, p. 3.

  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainHerbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Pope St. Clement I". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.


Sources

edit

Further reading

edit
  • Clarke, W. K. Lowther, ed. (1937). The First Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians. London: Society for the Promotion of Christian Knowledge.
  • Grant, Robert M., ed. (1964). The Apostolic Fathers. New York: Nelson.
  • Loomis, Louise Ropes (1916). The Book of Popes (Liber Pontificalis). Merchantville, NJ: Evolution Publishing. ISBN 1-889758-86-8.
  • Lightfoot, J.B. (1890). The Apostolic Fathers. London: Macmillan.
  • Meeks, Wayne A. (1993). The origins of Christian morality : the first two centuries. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05640-2.
  • Richardson, Cyril Charles (1943). Early Christian Fathers. The Library of Christian Classics. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
  • Staniforth, Maxwell (1968). Early Christian writings. Baltimore: Penguin.
edit
Listen to this article (18 minutes)
 
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 1 July 2014 (2014-07-01), and does not reflect subsequent edits.
Catholic Church titles
Preceded by Bishop of Rome
92–100
Succeeded by