In mathematics, Dirichlet's test is a method of testing for the convergence of a series that is especially useful for proving conditional convergence. It is named after its author Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet, and was published posthumously in the Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées in 1862.[1]

Statement

edit

The test states that if   is a monotonic sequence of real numbers with   and   is a sequence of real numbers or complex numbers with bounded partial sums, then the series

 

converges.[2][3][4]

Proof

edit

Let   and  .

From summation by parts, we have that  . Since the magnitudes of the partial sums   are bounded by some M and   as  , the first of these terms approaches zero:   as  .

Furthermore, for each k,  .

Since   is monotone, it is either decreasing or increasing:

  • If   is decreasing,   which is a telescoping sum that equals   and therefore approaches   as  . Thus,   converges.
  • If   is increasing,   which is again a telescoping sum that equals   and therefore approaches   as  . Thus, again,   converges.

So, the series   converges by the direct comparison test to  . Hence   converges.[2][4]

Applications

edit

A particular case of Dirichlet's test is the more commonly used alternating series test for the case[2][5]  

Another corollary is that   converges whenever   is a decreasing sequence that tends to zero. To see that   is bounded, we can use the summation formula[6]  

Improper integrals

edit

An analogous statement for convergence of improper integrals is proven using integration by parts. If the integral of a function f is uniformly bounded over all intervals, and g is a non-negative monotonically decreasing function, then the integral of fg is a convergent improper integral.

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Démonstration d’un théorème d’Abel. Journal de mathématiques pures et appliquées 2nd series, tome 7 (1862), pp. 253–255 Archived 2011-07-21 at the Wayback Machine. See also [1].
  2. ^ a b c Apostol 1967, pp. 407–409
  3. ^ Spivak 2008, p. 495
  4. ^ a b Rudin 1976, p. 70
  5. ^ Rudin 1976, p. 71
  6. ^ "Where does the sum of $\sin(n)$ formula come from?".

References

edit
edit