Talk:1991 in literature

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Danbloch in topic Redlinked works in Children's section
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 1991 in literature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Redlinked works in Children's section

edit

IP user 50.205.182.253 has been repeatedly wikilinking all the authors and works in the Children's section, and has added a large number of new works which are non-notable (activity books, a McDonald's Storybook), not children's books (Catfantastic II), or both (a 1991 release of Lord of the Rings). These are mostly redlinks, but they're also being done with no inspection so some are bluelinks to non-authors, e.g., Randall Stone, Mike Roberts. Unless I hear an argument as to why this is a good thing I'm going to remove all the redlinked works. (I've already done this a few times, but my changes were reverted without comment.) Dan Bloch (talk) 18:55, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply