This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article was created or improved during the Activists edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in January 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This piece needs to start with some clarity about what '30%' means.
Is it 30% of women on each board? Or 30% of women across all boards on a bourse? Or 30% of boards have at least one woman? Or if the organisation is blurring that meaning, in pursuit of the broader aim, then we need to say that. 116.48.27.189 (talk) 23:06, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I am inclined to coin the term "genderwashing"...their requirements seem completely non-committal and underdefined, at least if the "Approach" section is accurate. Sparklex (talk) 21:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
