Talk:Alfa Romeo Carabo

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

power&speed

edit

Very fancy figures here & i can't assume a typo. The sci-fi spacecruiser look would suggest even more speed but in real life....

- 1:The power was no more than 230 PS, as in "regular" alfa tipo 33 stradale (one can check that in reference cited in (1)). - 2:Even with 630 ps the car will not reach 550 km/h ( as an example a Bugatti Veyron with +1000 ps is largelly under such speeds ). - 3:The aerodynamic of the car (the lines suggest very few (to say the least) downforce ) will made it airborne well below such speed, as it happened to higly aerodynamically efficient Le Mans prototypes in the vicinity of 400 km/h (see "mercedes-benz CLR" w). - 4:Road-going or competition tyres of the early 70's would not withstand such speed wich is still problematic for 2010's ones. - etc...

 excuse the bad english (btw i must say that those blatant errors is much more in the french-wikipedia way...).

A.S. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.29.163.23 (talk) 14:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Its vandal made error -->Typ932 T·C 15:09, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alfa Romeo Carabo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply