Talk:Army of Freshmen
This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Neutrality tag
editThis article reads like it belongs on a fansite, not an encyclopedia.
- "Widely considered one of the hardest working independent bands in the world"
- "highly anticipated 3rd record"
- "triumphant appearance at the legendary Download Festival"
- Sources please. This is according to who? --OnoremDil 12:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
OK, I went in and revamped the whole article. I believe it's a lot more neutral and factual, has more information and I added some references.
Now... can someone help me figure out how to remove the neutrality tag and the "this article does not cite its sources" tag?
Also, I've been given permission to upload some photos by the lead singer of the band. He gave me the pictures. Please help me do this so that the photo does not get automatically deleted... again! Thanks. Any and all advice is appreciated! Chrissypan 15:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Chrissypan
Changes
editI made some changes, including taking out the part about them being the opening act for Bowling for Soup. While they play with them a lot, they're not really the opening act. They co-founded a tour together, so I altered that to make it more factual. ~~ChrissyPan —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrissypan (talk • contribs) 22:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Armyoffreshmenalbum.jpg
editImage:Armyoffreshmenalbum.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Army of Freshmen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070324103009/http://www.europunk.net:80/interviews.php?id=99 to http://www.europunk.net/interviews.php?id=99
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061022113911/http://www.jeffreybenice.com/id64.htm to http://www.jeffreybenice.com/id64.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Army of Freshmen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203020941/http://www.ernieball.com/news/20/ to http://www.ernieball.com/news/20/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090414084158/http://www.up-load.co.uk:80/pages/band%20pages/Army%20Of%20Freshmen/army_of_freshmen_page.htm to http://www.up-load.co.uk/pages/band%20pages/Army%20Of%20Freshmen/army_of_freshmen_page.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202234156/http://vcreporter.com/cms/story/author/chris_jay/7/ to http://vcreporter.com/cms/story/author/chris_jay/7/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Overly long page
editThe page is full of uncited information of little importance such as what small projects the band members worked on. Should it be this long? There is far too much information unrelated to music at all and the band does not have a lot of fans anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.44.62.92 (talk) 08:25, 25 June 2018 (UTC)