Talk:Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me

Plot

Is it just me, or is the plot section...not really a plot section. Can someone care to edit it to make it better suited? TCL 04:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

i just read through it, theres like what, the first paragraph and 1 somewhere in the middle, and thats about it for a plot. the other is stuff we cna makie another section for.--Cody6 02:08, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

In the article it states that the hills of L.A can be seen when its supposed to be downtown London. There is no downtown London :-)

There is now no plot section. The previous plot section was removed because it was vandalized, someone put in profane nonesense that had nothing to do with the plot of the film. I would have put in a replacement plot summary, but I confess I'm not that good with plot summary writing. Any other volunteer can step in to write a plot summary, provided it's not vandalism like the previous one was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Song tale (talk • contribs) 04:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:10077085.jpg

Image:10077085.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 01:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

No citations

Apparently, nobody noticed that this article had no citations, so i added that box at the top of the page that notifies the editors. Wills316 (talk) 22:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5iPwC4Tdx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aria.com.au%2Fpages%2Faria-charts-end-of-year-charts-top-100-albums-1999.htm to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-top-100-albums-1999.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Title Censorship section.

It is stated that "the title proved controversial in the United Kingdom, where the word shag is used to refer coarsely to sexual intercourse." This wording implies that the word was, and is now, used to mean something else in countries other than the UK. It also implies that the makers of the film were NOT using it with that UK meaning. This latter idea seems unlikely, so I suggest that there should be some explanation of how the word was generally then used, if at all, in the US where the film was made, and of the intentions of the film-makers when choosing the title. Blurryman (talk) 22:01, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

In the US, 'shag' means a fairly innocuous dance, the Carolina shag, originated in the 1940s. In 1987 The Tams had a No.21 UK hit with the song 'There Ain't Nothing Like Shaggin' ', which the BBC promptly banned from the airwaves because of the word's sexual meaning in the UK (this quite probably being the reason for the song's popularity). In 1989 the dance received considerable exposure with the film Shag, starring Bridget Fonda and set in 1963. The Wiki article on the film includes the memorable line, 'The girls decide to go to a local club so they can shag.'

Used in the sexual sense, the word is clearly just a piece of British slang that Mike Myers found amusing, with the advantage that it was not considered offensive in the US. It wasn't really that offensive in the UK either: in the early 1990s the Conservative politician and transport minister Steven Norris became widely known in the press as 'Steve "Shagger" Norris' after newshounds discovered that he had had five affairs during his then-current marriage. This was newsworthy because the government was embarked on its ill-fated 'Back to Basics' campaign against declining moral standards. Norris claimed that as the affairs were spread over 25 years they didn't amount to serious shagging at all. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk_politics/2000/london_mayor/726055.stm Austin Powers, of course, on being introduced to a young lady, likes to say, 'Shall we shag now, or shall we shag later?' Khamba Tendal (talk) 14:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

The first sentence of this section is "There were two variations of the posters; one of them asterisked out the middle of the offending word." There is no mention of an offending word earlier in the article. Might this be remedied? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.196.168.186 (talk) 19:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

 Done Sure, why not. --Muhandes (talk) 07:08, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Nixon?

Is the president in this film ever explicitly identified as Nixon? DonIago (talk) 17:34, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Soundtrack

Does anyone know why the REM cover of "Draggin' the Line" is missing from online streaming versions of the album? All2humanuk (talk) 13:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)