Talk:BitSight
Latest comment: 1 year ago by ClydeFranklin in topic Requested move 2 June 2023
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BitSight article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
 | On 2 June 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Bitsight. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 2 June 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 21:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
BitSight → Bitsight – Why: The company has rebranded and now refers to itself as Bitsight. The brand logo has changed as well. Righteous-Hawk (talk) 17:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 17:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- — Righteous-Hawk (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Comment: I've edited your request as you did not include the destination name in the template. – MaterialWorks 19:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- apologies, I am relatively new to this type of action. I ideally want a rename and do not necessarily need a move if possible. Righteous-Hawk (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. Page moves are pretty much the same thing as renames, just with a different name. – MaterialWorks 20:31, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- I believe that the name of the legal entity is still BitSight, capital S, for what it’s worth. Edit: Also, there is already an existing redirect at Bitsight —johndburger 20:12, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Also see this on their website, which repeatedly uses "BitSight". But what we need are independent reliable sources. — BarrelProof (talk) 00:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- apologies, I am relatively new to this type of action. I ideally want a rename and do not necessarily need a move if possible. Righteous-Hawk (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: So just to be clear, what's needed here is presumably a WP:SWAP of BitSight and Bitsight, because there are existing links in other articles to the current camelcase title. —johndburger 17:10, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: No evidence has been provided that this name change has even taken place. Can we get some sources for the rebrand? Skarmory (talk • contribs) 17:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- The only source seems to be their website (a primary source), which uses either "BITSIGHT" (all caps) or "Bitsight". Checked three of the secondary sources in the article, the titles of which in the references section use "Bitsight", and the actual articles use the camelcase "BitSight" in their titles. No joy. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 17:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. Unless recent, reliable, secondary sources are given to support this page move, then it is too soon. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 17:58, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: There were some IP edits two months ago that improperly changed the titles of cited sources and quotes from those cited sources. I reverted that. The sources did not change what they said. — BarrelProof (talk) 00:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.