Talk:California Dreams Tour

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Songs

edit

Can anyone put on a list of her songs in order? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterbrabel (talkcontribs) 02:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


Set List

edit
Can somebody put the actual set list, i think that the ALL the article is stuck without this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.24.20.1 (talk) 15:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
hey, can this sources be used? Setlist.fm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.24.16.1 (talk) 01:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
No; that site is not reliable. Yves (talk) 01:12, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
sorry about that xD, i readed that news pages can be good sources; it is in french, but it doesn't matter right?PurePeople —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.24.22.1 (talk) 21:53, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
That setlist is wrong, she does Hot N Cold before Firework and California Gurls and only did One of The Boys on the very first date. Born This Way is a constant addition to the set list, not just a one off. Conalae (talk) 19:45, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
The current "source" does not mention which order the songs were sang in and is unreliable, it should be removed. I obviously do not have a replacement reliable source or I would use it.
How's; this Still not 100% right for the current UK tour, but more correct than the current one.Conalae (talk) 19:07, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
NOT a reliable source. See WP:RS Itsbydesign (talk) 07:21, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
And the current source is? It's just annoying me that there is something I KNOW is incorrect is on the page, sorry. (Unlesss she changed it for that 1 French date) At the bottom., UK & Ireland, This one only works for me when I double click to copy the paragraph to a notepad, but it might just be my computer? etc, but they are just going to be denied. Oh well. Conalae (talk) 04:15, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yes the current source is. It's a French entertainment and leisure magazine, similar to Entertainment Weekly in the United States. Being a foreign language does not dis-merit its reliability All of the site you have listed are blog sites, which is user-generated content. No matter how "factual" the information may be, these are not deemed as reliable third party sources by Wikipedia standards. Again, check WP:RS if you need any additional help. Itsbydesign (talk) 10:57, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
No, but being wrong does... Damn sources reporting inaccurate information. It doesn't even mention the Whitney Houston cover... The San Diego one is a blog though? That's the one I was sure of.Conalae (talk) 05:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Again, none of the sources you have listed as deemed reliable by Wikipedia standards. Regardless of the changes the setlist may have, there is only one printed reliable source to reference.Itsbydesign (talk) 11:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Did you just skim my edit? I did not argue for any of my sources, I just questioned your decision on one of them as it does not look unreliable, mainly so I know for in the future. The setlist hasn't changed (much) - the source just used an incorrect one that was on here and blogs at the time. One last attempt; Breaks the setlist into its acts, and includes the missing cover. If that's unreliable here's sources for at least the missing Whitney Houston cover and the continued presence of Born This Way' ; NME - mentions both, Wanna Dance With Somebody, Born This Way. I would edit myself, but I'd rather get denied here and not waste time editing. Conalae (talk) 17:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Well, I explained to you earlier the source is a reliable magazine in France. Regardless of the language barrier, the French culture considers this a reputable source. I will do research on the Italian website you have listed and if I can find information for its reliability, I will make the changes to the setlist. Itsbydesign (talk) 10:52, 8 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
My research shows the Italian website is a reliable source per Wikipedia standards. Changes have been made. Itsbydesign (talk) 12:48, 8 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Need a Setlist

edit

This article is not good without the setlist. calvin999 (talk) 14:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Find a third party reliable source and the setlist will be included. Without it, it will constantly be deleted.Itsbydesign (talk) 10:55, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality

edit

This article is clearly not neutral, with words like "glowing." The article's critical reception section is very biased, as there have been many negative reviews, but none are included on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaga690 (talkcontribs) 18:10, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

There used to be a gallery in The California Dreams Tour article but it's not there anymore. The gallery had a collection of good images of the tour that couldn't all fit in the article, so can we bring back that gallery? There are lots of awesome tour images that aren't in a article. Plus, the gallery even showed what song was sang in the image. Another thing, I think there are too many images in The California Dreams Tour category. Some of them are really bad quality. Is it possible that we could delete some images? CPGirlAJ (talk) 21:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

In reviewing the edit history of the article, I see that the gallery was removed in July. You edited the article about a week later, so it was already gone at that point. I must say that I totally agree with the removal, per the editor's "clutter" comment and, more importantly, WP:Galleries. Yes, there are many great pics of Perry from the tour, but Wikipedia doesn't allow articles to be repositories for images. --76.189.101.221 (talk) 00:09, 25 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Source

edit

Found this link about the sound engineering for the tour. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 09:07, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on California Dreams Tour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on California Dreams Tour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply