Talk:Fort Carlton
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move 26 November 2021
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fort Carlton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Infobox
editThere is a choice between using Infobox Military Structure and Template:Infobox Protected area Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 04:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Requested move 26 November 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 10:29, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Fort Carlton → Fort Carlton Provincial Park – Fort Carlton Provincial Park is the correct name for the article. All of the provincial parks in Saskatchewan use the phrase Provincial Park, including the one other fort, Fort Pitt Provincial Park. See: List of protected areas of Saskatchewan#Provincial parks. I tried moving it myself but it wouldn't let me, so I need help. Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 00:51, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Polyamorph (talk) 10:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comments moved from WP:RM/T below.Polyamorph (talk) 10:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm not sure about doing this one, because the article isn't just about the national park - it's also about things that existed in that place under the name Fort Carlton before the national park. Dr. Vogel (talk) 01:27, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Masterhatch: I agree with DrVogel on this one; it appears that the article is mainly about the fort itself and its history, so the move is not uncontroversial. Lennart97 (talk) 09:18, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Masterhatch (talk) 10:28, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Masterhatch: I agree with DrVogel on this one; it appears that the article is mainly about the fort itself and its history, so the move is not uncontroversial. Lennart97 (talk) 09:18, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. The article is mainly about the fort itself. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Canada has been notified of this discussion. VR talk 03:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose, as noted above, the article is about the fort and makes very little mention of the park around the site. PKT(alk) 13:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.