Talk:Gordon Tullock

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

The footnote from the comment on the grounbreaking nature of his 1967 paper leads to his 1967 paper. This is misleading, and also puts in question the assertions in that statement. Who called it one of the most groundbreaking paper in the history of awesomeness? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.232.81.166 (talk) 18:53, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Absolutely agree with above re. the uncited and hyperbolic comment on Tullock's 1967 paper. So I changed it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.225.144.90 (talk) 19:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

other projects

edit

Should I develop a page on some of his more famous books, particularly "Calculous of Consent" ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomohawkmama (talkcontribs) 00:10, 30 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gordon Tullock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply