Talk:History of Białystok

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Isaidnoway in topic Very long

Untitled

edit

So where did this come from? It was plopped out of order at the very bottom of the article

History of the Germans in Bialystok

"What we, the people of today, we know about the Germans who settled in Bialystok in the days of John Clement Branickiego? Visitors from different parts of Europe moved to our culture, customs, traditions, religion, bringing great influence in the development of the city over the White. They built the foundation for the "Manchester of the North," as it was called Bialystok in the late nineteenth century.

Saxons were great soldiers of Napoleon's army, after losing a campaign in 1812 to settle in Białystok circuit and the city itself. Then they began to assume the first looms. After the introduction of high tariffs in 1834 for the products of the Kingdom of many manufacturers have moved their plants in the Białystok region. In 1834. Wilhelm Zachert opened the first factory in Supra. In 1840. Choroszcza Christian Moes in building another plant. Hasbach chose podbiałostockie Dojlidy, brothers Commichau and Becker - Bialystok. Manufactured in the Bialystok goods free of duty were sent into Russia, the Far East and Japan ...

Wold love to get some references for it.... Ajh1492 (talk) 15:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on History of Białystok. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on History of Białystok. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Very long

edit

This article is too long to read and navigate comfortably. When the tag was added on August 26, 2024, its readable prose size was 15,554 words. Consider splitting content into sub-article or condensing it. The article size impacts usability in multiple ways: Reader issues, such as attention span, readability, organization, information saturation, etc. (when articles are large). Total article size should be kept reasonably low, particularly for readers using slow internet connections or mobile devices or who have slow computer loading. Some large articles exist for topics that require depth and detail, but typically articles of such size are split into two or more smaller articles.

Word count What to do
this article
15,554 words
Almost certainly should be divided or trimmed
> 15,000 words Almost certainly should be divided or trimmed.
> 9,000 words Probably should be divided or trimmed.

Isaidnoway (talk) 22:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply