Talk:Jubilee Oval
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Special for it's crowd
edit"The Stadium is famous for its big crowds on match day". Isn't every stadium ? Are they partciularly big (the capacity figures suggest not) ? Is there something special about how the crowd swells on match day ? -Sticks66 09:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was No consensus - no discussion in over 2 weeks, no compelling evidence provided that the stadium is consistently referred to as "OKI" rather than "Oki", google searches come up split fairly evenly. Parsecboy (talk) 00:46, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Oki Jubilee Stadium → OKI Jubilee Stadium — Completing move request — Andrewa (talk) 14:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
From WP:RM:
Oki Jubilee Stadium → OKI Jubilee Stadium — (The correct title should read OKI as OKI Printing Solutions is written in capital letters as well as their logo. See www.oki.com) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mas0playa (talk • contribs)
Survey
edit- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Weak oppose. I'm not convinced that the rules are correct on this, but Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks) seems to indicate we should not follow the capitalisation of the trademark. The proposal at Wikipedia:official names might also be relevant. Andrewa (talk) 14:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Consensus gained?
editNot sure that consensus was gained, or sort for this move. The stadium is largely known as OKI Jubilee. I do believe there does need to be discussion on this matter.Londo06 18:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- I have not seen a single source relating to the expiration of OKI's naming rights for the stadium. It is known they will no longer be back-of-jersey sponsor for the club (St George Illawarra). Article moved back to OKI Jubilee until user who changed the name and added the comment about naming rights can provide a source. 165.228.178.143 (talk) 00:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
editThe issue of renaming stadium articles was previously discussed twice at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board. These discussions are now archived at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Archive 28#Stadium naming and Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Archive 30#Stadium naming pt 2. Consensus to move this article to Jubilee Oval was reached during the second discussion. Therefore, a move now should be uncontroversial. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:08, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Article returned to Jubilee Oval. florrie 07:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jubilee Oval. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101215012516/http://www.dragons.com.au/default.aspx?s=article-display&id=32333&work-continuing-at-dragons-home-venues to http://www.dragons.com.au/default.aspx?s=article-display&id=32333&work-continuing-at-dragons-home-venues
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jubilee Oval. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081226225835/http://stgeorge.yourguide.com.au/news/local/news/general/win-comes-to-jubilee-oval/1394165.aspx to http://stgeorge.yourguide.com.au/news/local/news/general/win-comes-to-jubilee-oval/1394165.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 28 April 2017 (UTC)