Talk:Lost in the Ozone
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:CommCodyLost.jpg
edit
Image:CommCodyLost.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
re: "Ozone House" mention
editSorry, it wasn't meant to be a "Pop culture/Trivia" thing, I just felt like it needed to be in its own separate section and didn't know what else to call it. The link itself was placed there deliberately to de-orphan that article. De-orphaning is not easy but it's an important and much neglected maintenance task undertaken in good faith by many hard-working Wikipedians seeking to improve Wikipedia overall. The problem is that all to often it's mistaken for "spam" or "advertising" when in fact the articles are chosen at random from Category:Orphaned articles. I believe this album/song being a namesake of an organization is encyclopedic content and notable enough to be mentioned in this article. Thanks. -- Ϫ 22:04, 11 July 2010 (UTC)