Talk:Matt Kemp

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

The amazing time-traveling Matt Kemp

edit
In 2001, he was accused of raping a woman in 2002? 159.233.81.122 (talk) 20:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
It's called a typo.. instead of making wise ass comments, you could just fix it. Spanneraol (talk) 22:31, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Kempafkdf.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Kempafkdf.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:26, 25 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Gjyu6u.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Gjyu6u.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:25, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Fgjkfjgrdtjr.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Fgjkfjgrdtjr.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Matt Kemp/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Secret (talk · contribs) 20:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I completely forgot about the Mat Latos GA review, once I was going to complete it, someone else took over. Will do this one tonight (if not done by Sunday feel free to delete it). Glad to see a familiar name attempting good articles. Secret account 20:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Starting....

  • Lead should be expanded further per WP:LEAD, add a sentence or two on his minor league career and his first few seasons.  Done
  • Nothing on his strengths and weaknesses or player profile like similar GAs articles like Ryan Braun has? For a player like Kemp that is important.
  • "was ranked third in the nation at one point." Who Kemp or the team? Clarify
  • What makes [1] a reliable source? Seems like a useless gossip site, replace or remove.  Done
  • Same with this.  Done
  • And this?  Done
  • Really?   Done
  • [2] is dead.  Done

to be continued..

fixed the references and tweaked the lead.. the sentence on his high school team clearly states that the team won the state title and was ranked third in the nation. will need a day or two to do the strengths and weaknesses section if that is required. Spanneraol (talk) 23:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • "After hitting just a single home run with just five doubles" The second just is redundant, remove, not to mention that his power numbers were low because of a lack of playing time (43 games compared to 122 the next season). The lack of home runs is worth mentioning, doubles not really.  Done
  • "five doubles" " 7 homers" be consistent with numbers under 10 per WP:MOS.  Done
  • "He also became the first Dodger and fifth major league player to hit four homers in his first 10 days with the team.[2]" Not mentioned in source unless I missed something.  Done
  • "He slammed 4 home runs" - tone, reword  Done
  • However, he made the fourth most outs in the base paths in the National League in 2007.[1] - Confused in meaning.  Done
  • "Going into the season, Kemp was expected to battle for one of the corner outfield positions, though his spot in right field was essentially guaranteed.[20]" How is someone expected to battle for a "guaranteed" spot?  Done
  • "in the same game that teammate, pitcher Brad Penny recorded his 1,000th career strikeout." - Off-topic trivia, remove.  Done
  • "That month also sparked Kemp's career high 19-game hitting streak," the next sentence also mentions the career-high, reword one of the two sentences (preferably the second)  Done
  • walk-off hit needs a wikilink for the non-baseball readers.  Done
  • "One big reason to why Kemp struggled was him hitting...." needs a proper source or be removed, as its going to speculation thus WP:OR.  Done
  • Nothing on the Ryan Braun - Matt Kemp MVP controversy?   Done
  • All pictures are suitable for use in Wikipedia.

My only major concern left is the playing style section, but considering that about half of our good article biographies on modern players don't got it, I don't see it as a must. I recommend one, especially if you want to advance the article to featured status, but I don't want that section from having good article status. I'll do a few minor copyedits. Good job. Secret account 20:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

This trade may not happen

edit

Just like the Jimmy Rollins trade, this deal will need to be approved by the Commissioner of Baseball to be allowed to happen because a lot of money is involved. The Commissioner could stop it. Wait until he doesn't kill the deal before making any changes per WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:21, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

According to Ken Rosenthal, the Commish hadn't even been notified of the agreement as of 6:59 AM.[3] – Muboshgu (talk) 15:23, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 12 December 2014

edit

BigRodger35 (talk) 04:04, 12 December 2014 (UTC) Traded to the Padres on 12/10/14Reply

  Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 08:27, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Matt Kemp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 31 July 2016

edit


Please, I won't do it again I promise

100.1.62.23 (talk) 02:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Mooseandbruce1 (talk) 02:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Matt Kemp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply