 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Reliable sources
editFirst of all, just to be clear, although I am an administrator, this doesn't give me any more say than anyone else over the content of articles. 92.8 - you are correct that Wikipedia should be based on references, but they have to be 'reliable' as determined by our policies and guidelines. This and this are both self-published and there is no evidence that the websites have "a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" like a newspaper has. That's not to say that I think that they are lying, but for us verifiability is more important than the truth. I have searched factiva and google news to see if I can find a better source but they don't seem to exist. As a result, this content doesn't belong in the article. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 14:42, 1 April 2013 (UTC)