This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The siege of Ceuta was actually in 1419, not 1418. I know both years are frequently reported, but the latter one is more confident. This is an old problem provoked by conflicting dates given by Zurara's chronicles. In his Cronica da Guine, he ambiguously states that "three years passed", which many readers have taken to mean three years from the capture, thus 1418. But Zurara pinpoints the date more precisely in his Cronica de conde D. Pedro (Lib. 2, ch. 5), notes it explicitly as 1419, and that "four years passed between the capture and the siege". 1419 also conforms with the slew of papal bulls and documents designed for the defense of the city.
Although 1418 still appears frequently in some maritime histories (which usually draw only from Cronica of Guine and overlook the Cronica of Pedro), 1419 is the date used by most modern historians.
I am in the process of assembling and preparing careful references for all this, and will include a discussion on the dating problem. (And it needs to be careful, since the dating of this siege affects the dating of the official discovery of Madeira by Zarco & Teixeira). But just for now, I'd like to give you all a heads-up. Once I assemble my references, I intend to change the title of this page to Siege of Ceuta (1419). If anyone has any objections at present (or can think up a better title) let me know. (In principle, I could accept using the ambivalent "(1418/9)" in the title instead, but it looks rather ugly.) Walrasiad (talk) 15:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A serious mistake is committed. Morroco did not exist in this epoch it is like to say that Castile was Spain in the 13th century.
In the same way it is ridiculous, the panel of campaign. In Morocco? It would be better to change it into Portuguese campaigns into the north of Africa--88.19.30.232 (talk) 23:37, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
