Talk:South African Airlink Flight 8911

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

object to the deletion

edit

This article should not be deleted because it's an airline crash with fatalists and injures and the aircraft involved has only had one other fatal crash before this one. The airline itself has not had a fatal accident and changed my have been made already it was probably not up onto the article because people forgot about. So Keep unlit vote — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.34.52 (talk) 14:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Except it's not an airline crash. A positioning flight doesn't count... - The Bushranger One ping only 20:57, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
And yet several accident articles in the US category have more or less the same articles with small regional aircraft used ??? like Pinnacle Airlines Flight 3701 and yet a aircraft which has only one other fatal crash and that was Atlantic Coast Airlines Flight 6291 and that was back in the 1990's and plus like I said before this is the only fatal accident for the airline. The only other incident it had when Flight SA 8625 an Embraer ERJ 135 overran the runway at George Airport also in 2009 and this accident no other and plus how many accidents in resent time has an passenger regional or lager aircraft crashed in South Africa. I think it would be best if we should talk about this on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Aircraft accidents and incidents because I known you are having issues with WP:NOTNEWSPAPER and WP:AIRCRASH maybe this should better talked about with other adims and get there opinions on the matter or a vote on the article detetion if requested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.226.32.159 (talk) 21:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just attempted to maintain the sources on Airlink Flight 8911. I managed to add archive links to 1 source, out of the total 1 I modified, whiling tagging 0 as dead.

Please take a moment to review my changes to verify that the change is accurate and correct. If it isn't, please modify it accordingly and if necessary tag that source with {{cbignore}} to keep Cyberbot from modifying it any further. Alternatively, you can also add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page's sources altogether. Let other users know that you have reviewed my edit by leaving a comment on this post.

Below, I have included a list of modifications I've made:


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:22, 5 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Airlink Flight 8911. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply