Talk:The Bachelorette (Australian TV series)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by TheCaliforniaKansan in topic Winner-related vandalism
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Winner-related vandalism
editFollowing the conclusion of the last episode, it would be great if a well-versed editor could cleanup the page. Several edits have been made to the article, most of which constitute as vandalism. --TheCaliforniaKansan (talk) 05:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Bachelorette's occupation
editThe Bachelorette has had several jobs in her career. After working her way up in BMW from sales to finance & insurance, she left the company in June 2014 to appear on season 2 of The Bachelor Australia, which she won.
Her most recent listed occupation is "marketing co-ordinator" for a magazine promoting the Mornington Peninsula.[1] DrX au (talk) 00:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- I have found a source which supports your claim. As such, I have removed the two previous sources and replaced them with the new one. I have also removed the LinkedIn reference you included, as LinkedIn is a social media service and as such is an unreliable source. Wikipedia is for everyone to edit, but your edits need to be backed up by reliable sources. Forbesy 777 (talk) 00:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- Without trying to create an argument, according to WP:SELFPUB, "self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves" under certain conditions. I can't see how a journo looking up your social media pages and publishing the info found there is more reliable than the original user-edited pages. That is what passes for "journalism" these days. DrX au (talk) 01:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- You are correct that some things (i.e. someone's occupation) can be referenced by social media according to Wikipedia's guidelines, and you are also right that newspapers and websites are not as reliable as they once were. However, I have always just used the rule of thumb that unless it is a popular website or a newspaper I do not cite it. I apologise if I was rude. I was just trying to convey my interpretation of Wikipedia's citation guidelines which are far from black and white. Have a great weekend, Forbesy 777 (talk) 01:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)