Talk:Thriller (viral video)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. It is very interesting. You seem to have done a good job. The main problem is that it does not have a bolded opening sentence in lead. Please see Wikipedia:LEAD#Opening_paragraph to see the rules for opening sentences. I stuck a sentence in temporarily as a place holder, but it needs fixing up. Otherwise, I am still reading through the article. You seem to have done a good job of combines sources and rewording the information. I am not sure if two Fair use images can be justified, but that can always be debated.

—Mattisse (Talk) 23:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your fixes, they were very helpful. :) As you suggested, I've done a slight rewording of the opening sentence. I've also removed the second fair use image, and it has been deleted under F5 of the speedy deletion criteria. Pyrrhus16 08:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

• I am not sure of the purpose of listing Discipline and Punish under See also, as I question its relevance to rehabilitation through dancing. (This, of course, is not a major point regarding the GAN.) —Mattisse (Talk) 15:38, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

• Removed. It was in the article before I cleaned it up. Pyrrhus16 15:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

• At first I was concerned that you did not have the usual sections, such as "Development", "Release", "Response", "Aftermath" etc. but in looking through the sections again, I have decided that for now the heading adequately capture the contents within each. Refinement of the sections might be something you can consider for the future. —Mattisse (Talk) 15:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks. I'll definitely try. Pyrrhus16 15:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Covers the context and major aspect b (focused): Remains focused on topic

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: Neutral

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.: Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): The one Fair use image is justified b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Good job. Congratulations!

—Mattisse (Talk) 15:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Yay! Thanks. :) Pyrrhus16 16:00, 13 June 2009 (UTC)