Talk:Wrap Me Up (Jimmy Fallon and Meghan Trainor song)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: MaranoFan (talk · contribs) 20:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Rollinginhisgrave (talk · contribs) 08:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Reviewing this for GARC :) Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 08:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Prose and content

• Fallon had always wanted to work with Trainor would be best to give this in quote form
• Do you know why Trainor was nervous on the call?

• Assumably because Fallon is a very popular celebrity and she looks up to him. I am not sure about putting that in the article, though, as it veers into WP:OR territory.--NØ 09:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

• The music video for "Wrap Me Up"
• Jimmy Fallon (left) and Meghan Trainor (right). you don't have to say left and right haha, the reader can figure it out.
• thought that like everything associated with Trainor—it was incredibly catchy can this be reworded to comment on the similarity to Trainor's other work, rather than it being catchy, as the previous sentence has already made this comment

Suggestions

• Fallon claimed that he really liked the holidays MOS:SAID
• "Wrap Me Up" is two minutes and 28 seconds long. MOS:NUMERALS says "Comparable values nearby one another should be all spelled out or all in figures"
• Randy Merrill mastered it MOS:SOB, consider "the track was mastered by ..." or "mastering was performed by ..."

Sources

• [3] N I would say fusion is an inappropriate descriptor as it implies individual songs are a fusion of comedy and traditional songs.
• [6a] Y (although I am unsure of the reliability of Qobuz, I have asked at RSN here)

• Qobuz should be fine. It pretty much always matches credits from a CD booklet, although I haven't cited a CD booklet here as the song wasn't pressed on it.--NØ 09:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

• [9a] Y
• [12] Y Although I don't know what this source is adding, and it reads as a listicle. Can be cut.

• It is a listicle but the part about "Wrap Me Up" is relevant as a reference to the cited text.--NØ 09:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

• [15] clock is this in a video?

• Marked it dead since it seems an update got rid of that part.--NØ 09:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

• [18] Y
• [21] Y

Other

• Neutral Y
• Stable Y
• Broad / summary style Y Not much to write, but meets standard
• No OR / COPYVIO Y
• Images appropriately captioned / illustrated Y

Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 10:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, Rollinginhisgrave. I appreciate you going out of your way to provide a spotcheck as I am usually too lazy to do this for GAs I review, lol. I think everything is handled.--NØ 09:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Looking good, thanks for making this an easy pass. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 00:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.