July 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Livingstone, Zambia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Shriram (talk) 10:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christ the Redeemer (statue) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shriram (talk) 13:16, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Christ the Redeemer (statue), you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Christ the Redeemer (statue) was changed by 122.176.36.42 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.934044 on 2011-07-29T13:18:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:18, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Christ the Redeemer (statue). Shriram (talk) 13:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deutschlandlied. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Geography of Germany, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Geography of Germany was changed by 122.176.36.42 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931144 on 2011-08-02T09:37:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:37, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Noida, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Noida was changed by 122.176.36.42 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893031 on 2011-08-02T10:45:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:45, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rajiv Gandhi, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

09:24, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of companies of India, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

November 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Atal Bihari Vajpayee has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Mayur (talkEmail) 09:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Nepalese passport. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 12:12, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.