February 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Allders without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, IronGargoyle (talk) 12:55, 6 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

April 2013

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Meetings, incentives, conferencing, exhibitions, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. andy (talk) 13:50, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Ryan Phillippe, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Yinta 14:22, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Hayden-Smith with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad 14:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply


 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 6 November

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 7 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

December 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BranStark. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User:BranStark— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — BranStark (talk) 15:06, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

September 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Æthelberht of Kent— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency (novel) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 15:26, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Loriendrew. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 2001 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 21:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2001. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. *Same edit removal ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 19:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at 2001, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 20:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2001. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 19:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at 2001.

Note: same removal as in March 2016 ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 18:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
@Loriendrew: Unless it's been recycled, this IP is allocated to four computers in Ashford library, which I use from time to time when I can't take a reference-only book out. (This is me - yes, I should create a non-admin alt, but I like seeing how people respond to IPs). There's no point issuing a block notice for this IP, the recipient will probably be a completely different person. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Napier School. Widr (talk) 15:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

195.194.187.132 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

@Widr: This is Ritchie333. This computer is a public access terminal in the Ashford public library. No single person can use the computers here for more than an hour at a time.

I came to the library to look at some "reference only" (ie: they cannot be borrowed, only researched in the building) railway books to fix some {{fact}} tags on Liverpool Street station. I edit logged out from here because I do not want my administrator login cached on a public computer, and it is faster and simpler. I have previously edited Folkestone Harbour railway station and Marshlink Line from this IP. A two year block is punitive and today has prevented the encyclopedia from being improved.

No mention above was made on how to file an unblock request (as I have never been blocked I don't actually know how to do it!) and the above explanation I gave was ignored. While I could cycle back home, WP:IAR unblock this IP and cycle back, I think an unblock request is fairer. 195.194.187.132 (talk) 13:37, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This particular IP has had sufficient vandalism to be blocked to anonymous users for much of the past five years; since you have a registered account, there's no reason it should affect you at all. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 13:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Recent edits to Jason James Richter

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Tito Dutta (talk) 20:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm DavidBrooks. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, History of the Encyclopædia Britannica, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. David Brooks (talk) 12:50, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi 195.194.187.132! You created a thread called My wiki entry is all wrong and has been heavily edited. Now it is semi protected and I cannot correct anything ??? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply


May 2019

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Louise Robey. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 17:54, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, 195.194.187.132. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Louise Robey, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 10:13, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Lodging BLP Complaint

edit

If you really are the subject of this biography you can go to WP:BLPCOMPLAINT. There you will find the measures you need to take. Thank you. TheDoDahMan (talk) 10:17, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

@TheDoDahMan: I am curious to how a supposedly distinguished actress is milling about the Ashford Gateway Plus public library (any edit to a railway station on this IP is almost certainly me logged out). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:45, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Ritchie333: I was just assuming good faith. I'm new to this and don't have experience looking up IP's yet. Besides, I think it worked; they went away...TheDoDahMan (talk) 15:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Louise Robey. TJRC (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. To jump to the section click here Thank you, --SVTCobra 11:31, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Squaring the circle— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:44, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Andrew Base. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Louise Robey have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Andrew Base (talk) 13:53, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Phoney War. Binksternet (talk) 19:48, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

February 2020

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Louise Robey, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Theroadislong (talk) 13:18, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Mike1901. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Francis Atwoli, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mike1901 (talk) 14:45, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Owlman, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 13:07, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.