67.162.108.96

June 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Black Cat (comics) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. BoL (Talk) 02:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Istus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Fireaxe888 (talk) 06:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Venus_(Marvel_Comics) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. DFDren (talk) 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ares (Marvel Comics) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  Mm40 (talk | contribs)  00:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, that last edit was not vandalism. I messed up. I have undone my edit. I'm incredibly sorry.  Mm40 (talk | contribs)  00:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, that was completely my fault. once again, sorry.  Mm40 (talk | contribs)  00:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I accidentally pressed the big red button. Also, I hope this will convince you to get an account:

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (67.162.108.96) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome!  Mm40 (talk | contribs)  00:58, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Hlal constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Húsönd 22:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I just wanted to redirect instead of having it deleted. 67.162.108.96 (talk) 22:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Re. Ekbir

Sorry, it looked like vandalism. I have restored your edit. Thank you for reporting my mistake. Regards, Húsönd 22:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Barefoot

Hi,

Have you considered an account? You get more respect that way, and probably fewer accusations of vandalism. Plus, it's easier to remember a user name than a one-in-a-trillion string of digits. And you're easier to contact.

You may be able to get your user page deleted by asking for Criteria for speedy deletion A7, but you might be better off asking an admin directly and explaining why SlickZ put it there. Basically a contribution history should be sufficient, and you might want to consider referring them to me for explanation. If you don't know any admins, perhaps the {{helpme}} template.

I've reported the Barefoot Bandit to User:FisherQueen. Incidentally, there's no real need to point it out to me - a simple revert is sufficient since BB seems to be using throwaway accounts now. I can't block, so talking to me doesn't really help much. Instead you might drop FQ a line 'cause she is familiar with the case (and her talk page is watched extensively) and if there's something blockable, she'll probably do it. The only other things you or I as non-admins might be able to do is drop a warning on their talk page - {{subst:uw-vand4im|PageName}} - or place the user in Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Creepy Crawler. Either way, with a series of throw-away accounts and no serious vandalism, there's not much we can do. If it were serious and sustained, hardblocking the IP might occur but that's not the case. Thanks, WLU (talk) 12:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

That's cool, no wories. My user name is somewhat easier to remember than FQ's (had a devil of a time remembering "no space and a capital Q" for the first month after she answered some question). You can still drop me a line, and if its persistant to one account I might be more interested. But really, FQ will know if a block is warranted (I suspect not, despite being a sockpuppet and vandal).

And no, not an admin. For now, of choice. And timing restraints. I've actually got it on my user page, I think its the first user box. WLU (talk) 13:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Captain America and the Falcon

Hi.

I rechecked the text in the Captain America article to see if I may have made an error, but it seems clear to me that I have not. The text I added the link to is talking about the May 2004 to June 2005 series. The article I linked to is about that series.

I think you may have been mistaken with your revert. :) Stephen Day (talk) 04:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

No worries, it happens. :) Stephen Day (talk) 03:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Various

I've deleted your user page per your request, and FYI the Barefoot Bandit has been caught and forced to wear great big heavy thick-soled boots ;) Thanks for your help, and all the best, EyeSerene^talk 14:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion is here. Holy crap that's a lot of socks. You could keep a whole village of tiny people in sleeping bags. WLU (talk) 14:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

I wouldn't have known about his/her return were it not for your input, ergo:

		The Minor Barnstar
		For assisting in the forcible shodding a shoddy editor, yon anon gets one minor barnstar. WLU (talk) 19:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

I actually linked to several archives that discussed Creepy on FQ's talk page a while back in one of my ANI posts - the one that starts with "Fantastic, y'all...". I also popped Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Creepy Crawler on Alison's talk page, which should be helpful.

Get an account! WLU (talk) 00:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

re: Juggernaut (comics)

This note is being left as this editor has participated in the week long edit war on Juggernaut (comics).

To date none of the participants has chosen to discuss their edits, why they feel they are correct and justified, and why they feel the edits of others are wrong or misguided. As a result there has been no consensus to actually change the article.

As such the article has been rolled back to what may be the "wrong version" and protected. This has been done to urge the participants in the edit war to actually engage on the article's talk page. A section Talk:Juggernaut (comics)#Restructuring the article has been added to help in this.

This is being left here as a courtesy, not a request for a direct dialog. Please direct your comments to the noted talk page and section.

- J Greb (talk) 11:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks - I have responded! 67.162.108.96 (talk) 12:50, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Iron Fist, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Noren (talk) 03:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

References

Thank you for your edits to Boccob, they are much appreciated, however, in future please add inline references to the sources you have used using the <ref></ref> tags, or <ref name="namehere"></ref> (with <ref name="namehere"/> used for references that use an already extant reference) so that it is clear where the information has come from. --Muna (talk) 16:21, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Selan (Dungeons & Dragons) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 23:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Changing valid edits

Don't go around changing edits people do that are valid. You went to my changes at Cloak and Dagger and changed everything I had changed. Looking at your list of vandalism complaints and warnings on here I can guess why. If you continue to do it in that same malicious manner I will have to ask an administrator to intervene. I made a large amount of constructive edits to that article and within 24 hours you had specifically singled out all of my edits and reversed them. businessman332211 (talk) 15:33, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Null (character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Null (character), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Null (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Brute (Reed Richards) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brute (Reed Richards), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brute (Reed Richards) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

---