Aoidh

Independent or non-independent articles

Please look at this source and can you give opinion if you think this is independent of the subject MSOE Muslim Sisters of Éire. I believe it is not independent because of the many interview quotes from the members, volunteers and coordinators at MSOE. You gave an opinion on interviews Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_380#Interviews. Was the comment for articles with pure interviews or also meant for articles like the IrishTimes where you have many interview quotes from the subject? Can you please give some time to respond at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:RangersRus_conduct ? RangersRus (talk) 12:09, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

@RangersRus: I apologize, but at the moment my Wikipedia time is mostly focused on an Arbitration case, though I'll note here that having quotes from an interview doesn't necessarily make the entire reference an interview, though that line gets somewhat fuzzy at times. - Aoidh (talk) 20:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

That is right "fuzzy". @Black Kite:, because I came from AFD platform where the interviews or interview quotes as non-independent were interpreted differently, now I am learning something different at AFC platform and I do agree with you also. The line like Aoidh said is sometimes fuzzy but is there a way that it can be more broadly explained on one of the policies by taking different scenarios, because it will tremendously help to clear lot of confusion on interviews. I hope we end this on good note and I can continue to learn more from experienced editors like you and Aoidh and hope we can work together and get your advice if needed. @Aoidh: if you have something more to add, please do. RangersRus (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Near edit warring at Chris Martin

Please note that User:GustavoCza is again on the verge of 3RR at Chris Martin (first sentance "best known" vs "widely known", and has engaged in a personal attack (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chris_Martin&diff=1262488538&oldid=1262470233 here) to maintain his version of the article. It seems the editor has a prominent history of Ownership. Your eyes on the article would be greatly appreciated.842U (talk) 01:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

@842U: I may not be able to review this in a timely manner, I would highly suggest opening a report at WP:ANEW. - Aoidh (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

@842U: I've looked at the history of the article and talk page, and GustavoCza making two reverts to the WP:STATUSQUO version of the article over three days isn't on the verge of 3RR. Per WP:BRD I would suggest reading and participating in the discussion at Talk:Chris Martin#"best known for" to try to get a consensus for your preferred changes. That said, @GustavoCza: the past part of your edit summary was entirely inappropriate. You were blocked in August for edit warring and incivility; if you continue with the inappropriate commentary you will be blocked, and if I'm the blocking administrator it will be an indefinite block until you can show that you understand that this is not appropriate and will not continue. There is no reason for comments like that, it serves no purpose but to inflame disputes. - Aoidh (talk) 01:38, 13 December 2024 (UTC)