Awolf002

Current talk items

Also see archive.

[{Dead Link}]

Greetings: I have an updated web page that is no longer 'dead', but still indicated as such on the Shiva Crater Wiki page.

4. ^ a b c d Teters, Thomas J. (2005-07-28). "Wiping out the Dinosaur with Five Simultaneous Impacts…". Starmon.com. http://starmon.com/KT_craters.html. Retrieved 2008-01-23. [dead link]

 how do I remove the [{Dead Link}] in that reference?  Attempts at editing will only, return  'reflist' and no itemized list???

THX & Think cosmic !! TomT - Starmon — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheStarmon (talk • contribs) 20:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Beagle 2 pic

OK. I'll email NASA. Hope we don't cause an international incident here! Guinnog 13:14, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Done. This will be interesting. Guinnog 14:25, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Gold Foil/Geiger-Marsden experiment

Hi. I always think of it as the Geiger-Marsden experiment too. The Geiger-Marsden experiment article was a redirect to Rutherford scattering, and I changed it to point to the pre-existing Gold foil experiment article. If I had started the Gold foil experiment article I would have called it Geiger-Marsden experiment since I had never heard of the other name before I read the article, and if I had been aware of it then Gold foil experiment seems a bit imprecise. However, the article already existed under that name and there are vast numbers of Google hits for Gold Foil experiment, as well as for Geiger-Mardsen experiment, and so it seemed a bit of a moot point about which was the best known. One of the changes I made to Gold foil experiment in my very first edit was to add the Geiger-Marsden name as a synonym[1], so editors before me presumably only knew it as the Gold Foil experiment. I have speculated that perhaps this name has come into use because it is more straightforward for school kids to remember. I don't currently have an opinion about which name is best because I don't know which is more widely recognised. By redirecting Geiger-Marsden experiment to the existing article I was sitting on the fence rather than expressing a view. Jll 00:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for the input. Awolf002 00:55, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Unblock me

Please ublock me, someone block my IP address , issue , resolved

Talk Ex-Yugoslavia

Talk:Kosovo#2 Administrator for Ex-Yugoslavien articels in Wikipedia- The voice of Kosovar

New look for box headers

There's a discussion on the WikiProject Astronomical objects page regarding a new look for box headers. I was hoping you could drop by and comment. Thank you. — RJH 14:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Current events box

Check my reply to your comment at Template talk:Current events box#Other current events redundant for Portal...I wanted to see if you thought an alternative was acceptable. Thanks—Kayaker 06:08, 1 July 2006 (UTC).

Thanks for keeping Current science and technology events current

I was wondering if the shuttle launch had happened and was about to head to http://nasa.gov/ when I decided to check out Current science and technology events first and saw confirmation of its delay. Thanks for keeping it current.

BTW, I was going to post this on Talk:Current science and technology events but that talk page is currently redirected to Talk:June 2006 in science. I didn't know whether to create Talk:July 2006 in science and post it there or overwrite the redirect and post it that way. Kayaker 18:53, 2 July 2006 (UTC).

Template:H5N1 cases

Augh! I have yet to get an edit to that template completely right! Thanks for catching the mistakes. Trying hard to make sure there aren't any, in spite of obvious proof to the contrary. :-( Waitak 15:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

That's a gracious reply, thanks. Especially appreciated from another person who had to wear one of those funny hats two or three times. Waitak 15:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Hope I got it right this time. Want to take a look, please? Waitak 13:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Request your attention to the GoldToeMarionette case

GoldToeMarionette (talk · contribs) had a WP:RFCU inappropriately completed on their account by Jayjg (talk · contribs) and Hall Monitor (talk · contribs) blocked the account after it was identified as a multiple account despite their being no violation of Wikipedia policy by GoldToeMarionette. These users did not respond to requests to undo the action.

Other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

Comments on RFCU itself [2]

Other Admins contacted [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

Hall Monitor was emailed with no reply

GoldToeMarionette posted on the account's User and Talk Pages seeking assistance when the talk page was protected without the issue being discussed. User:GoldToeMarionette User_talk:GoldToeMarionette

GoldToeMarionette notified article contributors that illustrative examples were subject to an AfD. The account strictly followed the WP:SPAM#Internal_spamming guideline. The AfD was without controversy. GoldToeMarionette did not participate in the vote. HereToCleanup removed the posts following the AfD in accord with the widely accepted Wikipedia Guideline Wikipedia:Spam#Internal_spamming that states "Clean up your mess. For example, after engaging in cross-posting to promote some election, be sure to remove those cross-posts after the election is complete." [8]

• GoldToeMarionette Contributions
• Breakdown of GoldToeMarionette's Posts
• Example post to 66 article contributors
• Example post removal from 66 article contributors
• HereToCleanup's Contributions
• No AfD participation

Since GoldToeMarionette was strictly following Wikipedia Policy, there should not have been a Check User completed by Jayjg. Hall Monitor only blocked the account because it was labeled as a sockpuppet by Jayjg's completed Check User. Absent policy violation it should not have been processed in RFCU or been blocked. I am asking for your help to confirm that policy was not violated, administrative action should not have been taken, and request that the administrative action be reversed by unblocking GoldToeMarionette and unprotecting the talk page. Thank you for your time with this request. RealTime 02:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

This user went around spamming all the admins beginning with A, see my talk page Ashibaka tock 18:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

3 Juno

Re your movie of 3 Juno, could you make it somewhat larger (match the template's width)? Also, there are resolved images from Mt. Wilson AO, reported in a Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics press release. The image should be licensed for public distribution. Michaelbusch 16:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Portal Space exploration

I hope you don't mind - I changed the name on the Portal page for naming conventions. I had to adjust the links to go to the individual templates - and changed the formatting to black/white as is already set up in wikiproject space. Let me know if you like/dislike the changes and we can correct it as needed. Cheers --Exodio 03:01, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

I like the look of the Portal - you are probably right about having different color schemes for the Portals - i know Mars is a pink color, etc. The only thing is you might want to not say it is based on NASA colours or you will have the Russian lovers all over your case :D --Exodio 14:28, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Portal peer review

Hello, Awolf002! Since it has been a month since you nominated the Space exploration portal for peer review, I hope you received good feedback on how the portal could be improved. If you would like, you could keep the portal listed at the portal peer review for more suggestions for improvement and ask the Wikipedians here for feedback. Also, if you think the portal is ready, you could nominate the portal for featured status. Either way, I hope you've received helpful reviews! Cheers, S.D. ¿п? § 02:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Reply to years in science

I changed these as they were all coming up as red links therefor I changed to the year xxxx. If there were not a red link I would have left them alone. I am trying to add years of death births, plus cleaning valelism, and Wikifying red links. Dfoley51 01:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

As this the only year in whatever page that has these links, rather than year links, I am only trying to make this clear. Transparency is a nice thing. This is why I accidently whiped out the older links, if they had showed up as red "xxxx in science " I would have left them alone as would have meant that page has yet to be to be put up, but red year number indicate something was "busted". I hope this explains my rational. Dfoley51 01:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I knew to what you were refering to, as I said tranparency is a woderful thing. A user that clicks on a year link would expect to go to the year vs. XXXX in science. My action eliminates any confusion. Dfoley51 02:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Messier 67 and Blue stragglers

Thanks for editing the German Messier 67 page. In looking at it, I went to the German Blue straggler page and discovered a gross error:

sind extrem heiße Sterne mit mehr als 50 Sonnenmassen

From Zhang etal: " ... the mass of S1280 is calculated to be 1.63±0.10 M , that for S1284 is computed to be 2.15±0.15 M ."

When I tried to login on the German side, I discovered my account does not work. Vegasprof 11:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Awolf, I have created an article Mass segregation. There is no corresponding article on the German side. Vegasprof 20:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Embedded Java Applets at Wikiversity

Are you heading this work up or is there another person doing so? I lost the test location and have some information that may be of some use in building robust code. If you could tell me who you think is in charge it would be very helpful to me. Wikiversity user:mirwin

P.S. I go now to look at your photos to see if they are big enough with detail sufficient as textures in animation of planets. I can get these from NASA but more fun to have our own GPL'ed! 8)

Thanks for the feedback on my talk page. I found this while looking for a Java based mud server and client. http://developer.berlios.de/projects/quizmaster/ It is in beta but it seems like it might be good to use to prototype the applet@wikiverisity code. Might get some more interest from some of the educators clamouring from quizzes in actually helping implement it. mirwin@wikiversity

Airwolf, you could really help me out by going here

[9] and adding yourself in the role of systems analyst, java integrater, whatever. You are fulfilling this function for us by working on the embedded applets thing as it will be critical to our mud server for our class project (a project provided for when no one has other ideas they wish to work on while studying at our learning trail). It would boost my morale plus seeing there are multiple people working on different aspect of the common project will, I think, encourage further participation. If you would rather not I understand but I sure would appreciate it the assistance! Lazyquasar 01:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC) aka mirwin@wikiversity

Retrocausality

As per JzG's recommendation, I've totally reworked the above article as a revamped stub. Please take another look if you like. Thanks Bwithh 20:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Lutheranism

The WikiProject Lutheranism Collaboration Project is under way. Please help improve this month's article, or make a suggestion for next month's article. To add the collaboration banner to your userpage or talk page, use {{Lutheran COTM}}. -- Pastordavid 19:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Barnstars

Please stop by and give your opinion on the two proposed barnstars for WikiProject Lutheranism. Pastor David ^† _(Review) 18:35, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Hymn Template

Nicely done! The only logistical issue for very popular hymns is what to pur in the translator field. 8-) --CTSWyneken 12:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:67p 05.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:67p 05.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 20:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Template:Astronomy portal daily picture

The template was deleted because it is unused anywhere. Was it being subst'd? --MZMcBride 03:08, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

I checked your contribs and saw your posts to ^demon's user page. I now have a better understanding of what happened. Because the template was "unused" (i.e., it had no transclusions), it was marked as {{deprecated}} as part of WP:DOT. There's supposed to be a fourteen day wait between the tagging and the deletion to allow for any unknown substitutions or transclusions to be discovered. ^demon jumped the gun and inadvertently deleted the template early (along with several others). I spoke with him and explained the two week wait and it's reason. A couple of notes for the future: it would be really helpful if templates that always subst'd would be marked somehow; also, if the template is for "personal" use, i.e., only you use it regularly for a particular purpose, it really doesn't need to be in the Template namespace. A user subpage with the content would act identically when subst'd. I hope this clarifies matters. Cheers. --MZMcBride 03:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit in 32P/Comas Solá

This revert: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=32P%2FComas_Sol%C3%A1&diff=169494695&oldid=169483150 Honest question. I checked When to revert. and still don't understand. Thank you. 89.129.186.159 15:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Kaufmann-Neumann experiment

Are you still working on this User:Awolf002/Kaufmann-Neumann experiment article? --D.H (talk) 15:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

POV

The POV-pushing in the article on Aristarchus of Samos has been removed. You complained about it earlier. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.41.51.240 (talk) 12:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

RE: Merged Portal "mock up"

I think the exact rotation spans would be best discussed at Portal talk:Spaceflight, but in my opinion, it would be best to have both the selected article and picture rotating weekly, and the biographies monthly. I agree with your comment about pictures being easier to rotate, and so I think that it would be a good idea to rotate these on a weekly basis, however I think that there should be no problem with keeping the article rotation weekly as well. In my experience at Portal:Spaceflight, there's been no problem in keeping the page up-to-date, and we've only missed one week since around this time last year. With the status indicator which I have developed, it should be easy to prevent this happening again. Assuming the merger goes ahead, which seems very likely, we will presumably have a few more people working on the portal, making it easier to maintain. Randomisation may be something to look at for the "did you know..." section. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 22:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

By the way, I'm probably going to close the proposal off and merge in two hours or so, if nothing more is said. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 22:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

The merger has been completed. Discussion about rotation intervals should be made at Portal talk:Spaceflight. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 01:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Mr. anti-POV

For a long time a throwback-Catholic-POV vandal, Holy Hydra, has been successfully demonstrating the inefficacy of Wikipedia anti-vandalism alerts and safeguards. HH's above January 5 flattering contact to you regarding the Aristarchus of Samos article is actually part of a typical HH tantrum, vandalizing anything connected to Dennis Rawlins or DIO since December DIO-citing insertions of comparison of Aristarchus's persecution to Galileo's. Your original query on earlier citations of DIO suggested POV (arguable) and OR (hardly). Later you evidently understood that the Rawlins discoveries were published in the leading forums of the field — a class which includes DIO, a journal backed by some of the most able scholars connected with the subjects discussed. As for "site-pushing" — over the last century-plus most of the discoveries of the bases of the few surviving key numbers of Aristarchus have been by Paul Tannery, Thomas Heath 1913 (the Dover reprint of which provides accessible relay of Tannery's germinal researches), and DIO. There isn't much, which is part of the reason the article is so short but why make it shorter? HH has no demonstrated expertise in this area so his almost-daily chippings at the article are not going to improve much and have generally degraded it. The removal of source references just destroys readers' access to the researches and mathematical developments underlying the text.

Suggestions. Do a revert to December 24. But include reference at least in a footnote to Luther's disbelief in the earth's motion, adding that though Luther did not threaten heliocentrists Lutherans in the U.S. were attacking geomobilists in the late 19th century long after Catholicism had let the matter drop. Add a reference to Otto Neugebauer's History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy (Springer, 1975) pages 634-643 (which takes a different view from Rawlins's on the value of Aristarchus's work) and to philologist Beate Noack's Aristarch von Samos (Wiesbaden, 1992, part of the Serta Graeca series) a careful investigation of the manuscript ancestry and establishment of the text of "On the Sizes and Distances of the Sun and Moon" (a work of which Neugebauer's discussion is one of the clearest). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.220.212.171 (talk) 23:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Note that Dennis Rawlins uses 128.220.212.171, although it is registered to an American university. Kowal, a friend of Rawlins, works at the same uni. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.174.243 (talk) 10:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

See below at "The Quality of Wikipedia…".

Portal:Current events/Science and technology

A comment in the Portal specifies "Please add new stories at the top of the current day"; does this mean if I want to add a story from earlier in the month; I have to put it under today? I would like to significantly add to the Portal... but with such a restriction it really limits what and how much I can do. - RoyBoy ⁸⁰⁰ 00:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The Quality of Wikipedia Editing. And Oversight

As noted above under "Mr. Anti-POV" the Aristarchus of Samos article has been repeatedly censored by a defender of the Inquisition (87.194.4.21, 86.152.174.243, etc; see above through the "Holy Hydra" link for others among HH's various IP numbers) who is simultaneously upset when (alert) Wikipedia monitors undo any of HH's many months of equally aggressive vandalisms, e.g., on September 22 inserting into the Alex Ferguson biography the helpful information "he is a pig and he sucks cocks for money". If this is the brand of editor Wikipedia wishes to have deleting citations to researches presented at the University of Zürich (van der Waerden, through a Johns Hopkins University-edited journal) and the British Museum (Rawlins), then the unkind press Wikipedia has been getting in recent months is understandable.

It is probable that restoration of the Aristarchus article will unloose further persistent vandalism of the Rawlins biography. (HH has been going at the Richard Dawkins circle in the same fashion interminably. It is HH's well established routine to pest-vandalize those who engage in the defiant sin of error. By the implicit threat of this, HH apparently hopes to force upon Wikipedia correctness according to HH.) But a revert (adding further citations for neutral balance) should be risked and carefully watched since Aristarchus's importance greatly exceeds Rawlins's.

Project

Hi, it's nice to have you back. Please look at User talk:Awolf002/Kaufmann-Neumann experiment‎. --D.H (talk) 16:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Hirsau Abbey

I see you have tagged Hirsau Abbey for POV issues, based on its largely still unedited "Catholic Encyclopedia" content. This has been an unfortunate article, for reasons long forgotten and not worth revisiting, and it does indeed need a thorough re-write. I'll have a go at it soon (but not immediately). But there's no getting round the fact that this is an article about a Catholic monastery and that as such it can't avoid dealing with largely Catholic subject matter. HeartofaDog (talk) 14:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Portal:Astronomy

Hi, I'm Marx01 and i was curious if you were the person whose works on the Wikiproject Astronomy Article of the Month Section. If so; is there any way that can be an article of the week? I would help if needed, but the portal feels so old. I think that an article of the week would help increase visitors and help get the portal back in shape. Thank you for your contributions! Marx01 ^{Tell me about it} 23:47, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Portal:Star

Hi I have created a portal named star. Please help it make more nice. --Extra999 (talk) 08:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Alva Noe

After having deleted Alva Noe, I was told that I shouldn't have deleted it, and that German Wikipedia's article is evidence to this. Since you are an admin here who knows German, I would like your opinion on the matter. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Rosetta Linear small.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rosetta Linear small.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 05:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Experimente by Kaufmann etc.

Hallo, regarding our earlier discussion two years ago: Based on the sources by Miller, Janssen, Staley, I will continue User:Awolf002/Kaufmann-Neumann experiment and put it into the main name-space. --D.H (talk) 14:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Done, see Kaufmann–Bucherer–Neumann experiments (the version history with your contributions is of course still present). --D.H (talk) 17:51, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Huygens landing site.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Huygens landing site.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 16:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC).

Non-free rationale for File:Huygens landing site.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Huygens landing site.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:56, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 14:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC).

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

See also: Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2011#September 2011

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 00:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

• From the Editor
• What are You doing For Lent?
• Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
• Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

---

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Huygens landing site.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Huygens landing site.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:09, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Huygens landing site.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Huygens landing site.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:21, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox hymn

Template:Infobox hymn has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox musical composition. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Space exploration portal daily picture

Template:Space exploration portal daily picture has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 03:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Fram (crater) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fram (crater) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fram (crater) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)