User talk:Cmglee/archive2020

≤ 2O1O	2O11	2O12	2O13	2O14	2O15	2O16	2O17	2O18	2O19
2O2O	2O21	2O22	2O23	2O24

Topics started in 2020

Sarrus_rule_cross_product.svg

Updated with a and b

Hi! I noticed the English-language version of Cross product has been largely unified to use vectors a,b rather than being inconsistent between them and u,v, so your nice little svg is no longer in sync with it. I was about to upload an altered version of it (all I had to do was replace >u< and >v< with >a< and >b< in a text editor), but then it occurred to me that I should see if you were active, because if so, it'd be better to have you do it and thus be in the loop and not feel like your toes were stepped on. ;) Since you definitely are, can I get you to upload an alternate version, maybe Sarrus_rule_cross_product_ab.svg, and link that from the English-language page? The other languages still seem to be using u,v in that section so I wouldn't want to replace the original, at least not yet. Thanks! Felice Enellen (talk) 18:46, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

 Done Thank you very much for checking with me, @Felice Enellen: much appreciated! Besides the tspans, I also updated the description in the SVG. Cheers, cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 21:53, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Cheers! :) Felice Enellen (talk) 20:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

FYI, I've updated both images to use the proper Unicode minus sign (−). cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 23:59, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Barnstar for Comparison of notable bridges

Hi there, Cmglee! I was reading the article on the Millau Viaduct today and I found your interactive comparison of notable bridges to be incredible. What an exemplary addition to Wikipedia! I wanted to give you a barnstar of some kind, but I can't find a good place on your page to do so. Would you accept one? —Shrinkydinks (talk) 04:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Edit: This one:

Thank you very much for your kind words, @Shrinkydinks: feedback like yours definitely encourages me to do more illustrations. And yes, please; I'd most appreciate a barnstar! You've brought up a good point – my archiving method hides barnstars I get. If you wouldn't mind leaving it on this page, I'll make a barnstar subpage and transclude it from my user page. Cheers, cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 02:31, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Copyright Help

Hello,

I thank you very much for your assistance. I had indeed requested for assistance and was assured that a coastline shapes from a straight down angle would not be copyrightable. To avoid any future controversies however, I will be sticking to OpenStreetMap for future works (albeit all of them linked to the Singapore MRT as I have yet to branch out). It's indeed my hobby to create graphical content.

Thank you once again. Seloloving (talk) 19:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Seloloving, You're welcome. I'm glad your issue has been resolved and you're not discouraged from contributing. I agree with the assessment that tracing from a photo is OK; after all, OpenStreetMap now lets editors trace Bing Maps aerial imagery.

Illustrating is also my hobby, and I've been looking at making SVGs more dynamic. An overlap between our work may be highlighting public transit lines on hover. It may even be possible to show the shortest route, including changing trains, by clicking a station and hovering over another, but it scales by O(n²) so quickly gets unwieldy for over around 30 stations. Anyway, if you feel like making your maps dynamic, give me a shout.

By the way, a barnstar is heading your way! cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 23:46, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, yep, I will be relying primarily on OSM from now on. I must say, your work is absolute genius. I had seen that graphic regarding bridge structures before and was most impressed by it. Unfortunately, the expertise required to pull off such complex files are truly beyond my ability to comprehend as I rely primarily on Inkscape, so I am not sure. Seloloving (talk) 13:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, @Seloloving:; very kind of you to say that :-) You made a good point about my experiments: if I wish people to make more dynamic SVG, I should speak their language (i.e. Inkscape). I'll see if it's possible to do it in Inkscape and write a tutorial, or alternatively, create a template that can be edited and added to in Inkscape.

Did you learn to use Inkscape from Wikimedia/Wikipedia/Wikibooks etc? If so, which page(s) did you use? Have a good day! cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 23:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

I am not sure it's possible to create dynamic SVG on Inkscape though. I have been using Inkscape since 2011 and didn't learn anything from a Wiki, but spent months over months just experimenting and gradually developing a skill for it (with the help of Google, of course). Seloloving (talk) 01:37, 14 February

@Seloloving:, I typically either generate SVGs by hand or Python (or Perl) scripting. I find that it gives much more control, at the expense of ease of creating freehand shapes. Nevertheless, I'll experiment with Inkscape over the next few weeks. Cheers, cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 23:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

@Cmglee: Thank you for checking copyright, I just read Special:Diff/940342014 (please ignore my recent e-mail).  — Johannes Kalliauer - contrib. 19:21, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome, @JoKalliauer:. cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 23:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Interactive SVG for metro station layout

Hello! It appears you're the expert on interactive SVGs, so I'd like to ask for some advice. I'm currently bringing Harvard station to GA quality, and I'm hoping to include a map/diagram of the station. It has a complex layout, with several levels, so I'd like to allow viewers to show/hide levels in the SVG. I've obtained blueprints and am working on the diagram, but I'm unsure how to add the interactivity and make it user-friendly. Is this something you'd be able and willing to help with? Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Pi.1415926535, Thanks for your message. I don't consider myself an expert, but sure I'll be glad to help. As I wrote on user:cmglee/Dynamic_SVG_for_Wikimedia_projects#Progressive_disclosure, it can be done using SMIL and CSS (and JavaScript, but that's disallowed in Commons uploads). Both support hover effects:

Hover only

As far as I know, only SMIL supports toggling the state of multiple objects (your levels):

Hover and toggle

SMIL is, however, less well supported by browsers.

Let me know what you'd like me to do. Cheers, cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 09:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm thinking SMIL will be the way to go, even with the browser limitations. Once I finish the static levels, I'll let you know. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Clock Face montage photo

Hi, just reaching out to check all would be well to use the clock face montage photo you created for the Abraj Al Bait article for the List of largest clock faces article which I have just reformatted to be a table and added a gallery. Thanks. Robynthehode (talk) 12:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Robynthehode: of course, feel free to use it. Thanks for asking, cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 22:05, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Illustration on Prosecutor's fallacy

Thanks for adding the frequency tree illustration in Prosecutor's fallacy, as it is really enlightening for the readers. I have a question regarding the numbers in the illustration: according to the texts "only one woman murdered for every 2500 women who were subjected to spousal abuse" and "the chances that a batterer actually murdered his partner, given that she has been killed, is about 8 in 9 or approximately 90%", shouldn't the correct numbers be 40 (instead of 45) in the 'murdered' and 36 (instead of 40) in the 'by partner'? - Saung Tadashi (talk) 02:11, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, @Saung Tadashi: According to Gigenrenzer's book "Reckoning with Risk", Dershowitz stated "certainly fewer than 1 of 2,500—of men who slap or beat their domestic partners go on to murder them." Gigenrenzer thus used the 40/100000 figure for "murder by partner", not "murder by anyone". This leads to the correct 40/45 i.e. 8 in 9 figure. Cheers, cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 22:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Understood now! Thanks for the clarification 🙂 Saung Tadashi (talk) 03:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Interactive Map

Hello

I recently remembered that you are able to create interactive elements in SVG maps. May I know what would you recommend for this map?

I have managed to create a map similar to the one described on this page, but alas, found out too late that Wikipedia apparently does not allow any SVG with the script element (understandably). Would there be an alternative method? Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 02:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your message, @Seloloving: nice map; it shows the boundaries well. My recommendation depends on what you'd like to visualise and what data you have. Here are some possibilities:

• The first image (map) on User:Cmglee/Dynamic_SVG_for_Wikimedia_projects lets readers toggle on and off features, as well as groups of features. If your electoral districts are grouped e.g. by political party or region of Singapore, you can have buttons to highlight all belonging to a group.
• User:Cmglee#SVG_highlight_on_hover_template.svg_☎_17_Nov_2019 shows how elements linked to a given one can be highlighted, e.g. MRT lines connected to a given one. It's likely less applicable to your map.
• For students, you can create an interactive quiz: commons:File:Mapquiz_USA_states_SMIL.svg.

Re shading districts to a given criterion, that can be done with CSS: commons:File:Map_of_the_national_days_by_country.svg.

You can even shade them to several criteria, and let the user choose which criterion to view.

Let me know if you've any specific ideas you'd like to try. Cheers, cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 09:01, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Comparison satellite navigation orbits.svg scheduled for POTD

Hi Cmglee,

This is to let you know that the featured picture File:Comparison satellite navigation orbits.svg, which you uploaded or nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for August 21, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-08-21. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

View animation

This is an animation showing geocentric satellite orbits, to scale with the Earth, at 3,600 times actual speed. The second-outermost (shown in grey) is a geostationary orbit, 35,786 kilometres (22,236 miles) above Earth's equator and following the direction of Earth's rotation, with an orbital period matching the planet's rotation period (a geosynchronous orbit). An object in such an orbit will appear to occupy a fixed position in the sky. Some 300 kilometres (190 miles) farther away is the graveyard orbit (brown), used for satellites at the end of their operational lives. Nearer to the Earth are the orbits of navigational satellites, such as Galileo (turquoise), BeiDou (beige), GPS (blue) and GLONASS (red), in medium Earth orbits. Much closer to the planet, and within the inner Van Allen belt, are satellites in low Earth orbit, such as the Iridium satellite constellation (purple), the Hubble Space Telescope (green) and the International Space Station (magenta).

Animation credit: Cmglee

Recently featured:

• New Sarawak State Legislative Assembly Building
• Gaillardia pulchella
• Alice Paul

de Bruijn sequence B{10,3)

B{10,3} with digits read from top to bottom then left to right; appending "00" yields a string to brute-force a 3-digit combination lock
0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
011
012	112
013	113
014	114
015	115
016	116
017	117
018	118
019	119
021
022	122
023	123	223
024	124	224
025	125	225
026	126	226
027	127	227
028	128	228
029	129	229
031
032	132
033	133	233
034	134	234	334
035	135	235	335
036	136	236	336
037	137	237	337
038	138	238	338
039	139	239	339
041
042	142
043	143	243
044	144	244	344
045	145	245	345	445
046	146	246	346	446
047	147	247	347	447
048	148	248	348	448
049	149	249	349	449
051
052	152
053	153	253
054	154	254	354
055	155	255	355	455
056	156	256	356	456	556
057	157	257	357	457	557
058	158	258	358	458	558
059	159	259	359	459	559
061
062	162
063	163	263
064	164	264	364
065	165	265	365	465
066	166	266	366	466	566
067	167	267	367	467	567	667
068	168	268	368	468	568	668
069	169	269	369	469	569	669
071
072	172
073	173	273
074	174	274	374
075	175	275	375	475
076	176	276	376	476	576
077	177	277	377	477	577	677
078	178	278	378	478	578	678	778
079	179	279	379	479	579	679	779
081
082	182
083	183	283
084	184	284	384
085	185	285	385	485
086	186	286	386	486	586
087	187	287	387	487	587	687
088	188	288	388	488	588	688	788
089	189	289	389	489	589	689	789	889
091
092	192
093	193	293
094	194	294	394
095	195	295	395	495
096	196	296	396	496	596
097	197	297	397	497	597	697
098	198	298	398	498	598	698	798
099	199	299	399	499	599	699	799	899	(00)

References

You've got mail

Hello, Cmglee. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Benedictaddis (talk) 12:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Mnemonics in trigonometry#Sines and cosines of special angles

Please add a reliable source for this material. -Apocheir (talk) 22:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

U. S. standard atmosphere

Hello Cmglee, everybody notices what fantastic pictures you make. Now in the page U.S. Standard Atmosphere you also made a great plot, which was subsequently altered for the worse by Users Athaler and Nelsonj3. And behold, the WP account of these Users no longer exists. I find we should re-insert your original picture in the article (which, by the way, is also well done). This would then also be in tune with your other, similar plot in the page International Standard Atmosphere. Do you agree? Should I proceed by the file discussion page, or by the article discussion page? Or just change it in the article? Regards, Herbmuell (talk) 06:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC).

Nomination for deletion of Template:Euler diagram of number sets.svg

Template:Euler diagram of number sets.svg has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Mount Everest 3D map

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Everest-3D-Map-Type-EN.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 02:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The Optical Telescope of La Palma in the Canary Islands

Hello Cmglee:

First of all. Thank you very much for your work. I'm writing to you because we have a debate (in Spanish) about one of your computer graphics of optical telescopes. The Optical Telescope of La Palma in the Canary Islands, which is within the computer graphics?

Thank you very much !!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElAutosuficiente (talk • contribs) 17:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi ElAutosuficiente, thanks for the compliment. Sure, I'm glad to help. What's the question again? cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 22:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

---

≤ 2O1O	2O11	2O12	2O13	2O14	2O15	2O16	2O17	2O18	2O19
2O2O	2O21	2O22	2O23	2O24