Dphilp75

Intro

I have a rather broad area of knowledge, and am recognized locally as an expert on Constitutional Monarchies via my association with the Monarchist League of Canada as well as many topics in regards to the Westminster Style of Government and many aspects of the Canadian Armed Forces as I am an Officer in the same.

I am happily open to being proven wrong as this helps me learn, but have very little patience for anyone who will not admit to being wrong no matter how many facts you show them. I look forward to any contributions I can make as well as learning from all of you! Cheers! Dphilp75 (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: your comment

I only undid it once, not many as you seem to have implyed with your comment on my page The C of E (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Thats OK The C of E (talk) 17:38, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

List of heads of state and government by net worth

I am not sure what you mean by major change. I assume it is the use of full titles? I did not feel using colloquial terms was appropriate, as there seems to be no rhyme and reason to such uses.

As for HM's governments, listing all of them seems a bit excessive. I mean, no one is going to read the list and wonder which Elizabeth II, and then see Queen of Tuvalu and exclaim, "Oh! That Elizabeth II." Using the UK and only referring to the Commonwealth is not meant to be a subordination, jsut a time-old practice of placing the senior title first and also based off the form that Elizabeth herself used. I was considering adding Canada to the list, actually, because it is the second most senior title in her retinue. The only reason I didn't was because I figured I would hear responses of, "If Canada is added, why not Australia? It is as important as Canada." Then requests of New Zealand. Then Papua New Guniea, and Jamaica. Then with half included, people would say it is only appropriate to add the other half.

I am actually good friends with a guy who French-Canadian on his mother's side and First Nations on his father's, so I have a sense of how sensitive these national and social issues are to Canadians. I am trying to be as unbiased as possible. It just seems unnecessary to me to list sixteen nations every time HM is mentioned. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 16:19, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Ah, under 'fantasy titles', no? I looked past that because the heading seemed irrelevent. I will put the suggestion there and change HM country simply to the link for the Commonwealth and see how it plays out. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 19:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Monarchy vs Republic

If we hold it at my talkpage (easier when kept in one place)? 'tis fine by me. GoodDay (talk) 19:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm afraid we'll have to nix it. Check things out at my talkpage, for reason. GoodDay (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

{{helpme}} I'm wondering where to look for the various projects Wikipedia is currently involved in..Can't seem to find em..! Thanks!! Dphilp75 (talk) 03:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Do you mean WikiProjects? Or Wikimedia projects, like Wikimedia Commons and Wikinews?  fetchcomms☛ 03:46, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

You're very welcome :)  fetchcomms☛ 05:16, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Not running against a new leader in a by-election

It's not actually true that Reform or the Canadian Alliance ever followed that convention; for instance, while the PCs didn't run a candidate against Stockwell Day in Okanagan—Coquihalla in 2000 (or against Stephen Harper in Calgary Southwest in 2002), the Alliance did run one against Joe Clark in Kings–Hants in 2000. And since the creation of the current CPC, we don't know whether they plan to honour the convention or not, because there hasn't yet been an opportunity to find out. So we really can't say at this point that anybody other than the Liberals and the old PCs observe(d) it. Bearcat (talk) 00:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

I agree with you. However, since the PCs never did it, and the Conservative Party of Canada was born from both the PCs, The Alliance and the Reform, I think they all need to be mentioned when speaking of the CPC. Is that clear? I'm not sure if I have written that very well...? Dphilp75 (talk) 00:52, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

NM! I saw what you did and it is better than what I has! GJ! Dphilp75 (talk) 01:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: CAS (Canada)

Hi! Great to see someone helping to fix the article. I wanted to touch base with you before we start an edit war. ;) If you'd prefer to chat on my IP user page there's no other topics to compete with.

I like your status edit~ it feels solid. The actual conglomeration seems difficult to label, a broader term like NGO may sum it up perfectly. And your elaboration of the concept in the article seems spot on.

If you get a chance, check out my IP/user talk page please! I put up a note to let enquiring visitors know where I'm coming from; perhaps a bit of collaboration would help avoid my POV issues and "axe grinding" tendencies.

I really want to restore\revise the "History of CAS" which can be found in this revision: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children's_Aid_Society_(Canada)&diff=342735534&oldid=340542418

I think it clearly shows a noble begining and conveys an origin based on good intentions, plus it follows the evolution of this organization from 1800's - 1970's in a very coherent manner. It's so well written though, kind of worried it's plagiarized from somewhere.

I'm totally stumped on how to cover CAS history from 1975-2010 in a NPOV manner, to me it feels like a lot of horrific things have passed in these modern decades.

Thank you for your time and efforts. 99.229.227.162 (talk) 01:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Was still wondering..

I know CAS is a corporation as it often carries the Inc. suffix on public financial transactions. And I'm pretty sure CAS stock is not publicly-traded, even though "membership" is quasi-public. (I should go find a proper reference regarding stock acquisition.)

But if this is the case, doesn't it make CAS, Inc. a Private Corporation? NGO is fitting none the less, but on the edit you stated CAS "*IS NOT* a Private Corporation". I'm interested to learn more about what you mean, school me please.. how, and why not?

Thanks again! 99.229.227.162 (talk) 20:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Wayne Gretzky

Main page: Talk:Wayne Gretzky § What? Gretzky a "Canadian-American"?

There has been an endless edit war for months and months. I have simply removed the nationality from the lead altogether. I realy think per the MOS there is no need to mention his nationally in the lead at all - plus sounds odd hes a retired Canadian? We cant keep edit Waring over this silly point.Moxy (talk) 00:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!