User talk:GoPurpleNGold24/Archive5
Reading Royals Roster
editPlease do not remove the spaces between the players on the Reading Royals page. It eases editing in the template as the roster is fluid and players are constantly coming and going, as well as moving from the IR to active roster. Shootmaster 44 (talk) 11:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Your edit as of February 10th, removed all the deliberate spacing between each player's info on the Current Roster. Please leave those spaces in as it eases the editing. Shootmaster 44 (talk) 02:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for the wait, i didn't know i was doing that, i apologize. Black'nRed 05:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Your edit as of February 10th, removed all the deliberate spacing between each player's info on the Current Roster. Please leave those spaces in as it eases the editing. Shootmaster 44 (talk) 02:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Is there a serious problem to this template? --Flarest (talk) 13:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I was curious about why you made this edit: [1]. Since you don't use edit summaries, I really don't know why you removed about half of that article, especially since parts of it seemed to be decently sourced. Thanks in advance for your response. Eric (EWS23) 09:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi
editPlease don't do that.
STOP changing player positions to IMPROPER grammar
editMy god, hundreds of pages would have to be fixed by hand because of you. You don't change something like small forward to Small forward in the middle of a freaking sentence. Like "he plays at the position of small forward and you freaking changed them to "he plays at the position of Small forward, which means every page you did that to now has grammatical errors on it. Don't do that again or it will be reported.
In fact fix it or it will be reported.
--Wiki Greek Basketball (talk) 17:26, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Calm down man, i fixed it, i will report YOU if you write those kind of comments on my talk page again. Black'nRed 01:54, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for restoring the lede on the Mark Sanchez article
editThe Sanchez article was my first GA bio (I've created one FA season article), and when I looked at the page from a friends cell phone last night I was sad to see someone, in good faith, moved the lede to the "early years" section. I was hoping, in between last night and when I got around to logging in today, some experienced editor would come in, realize what happened, and restore it --especially since now that page is almost certainly going to spike in views (esp. from the New York area). Thanks! --Bobak (talk) 18:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Stupidity
editWhen i edit kaka going Real you guys say i atack or i vandalsim you wil see Ronaldo is going Real so stop stupidity Thanks! --alexandrey —Preceding undated comment added 19:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC).
- Don't write those things in the edit summaries, we know he is going to madrid. Black'nRed 19:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
CRUZ AZUL
editwhat do you like noob?
why modific or remove my edits of C.D. Cruz azul??
porque modificas o quitas mis ediciones del C.D. Cruz azul
no te andes con mamadas que solo andas de cagapalos -.- si no te gusta haya es tu p2 pero yo lo pongo para aportar
otra mas y te reporto ala merga —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kikesexy (talk • contribs) 22:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Éste tipo siempre hace lo mismo. Borra ediciones de otros y pone las suyas. Muy molesto en verdad. 201.172.69.85 (talk) 03:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Yo Lakers fan!
editI saw the page revision stats for LA Lakers and you have the highest revs. So, did you venture downtown for the parade? 137.154.73.31 (talk) 03:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)