Invisiboy42293

Screamo list

I like that you sourced The Number 12 Looks Like You, but I don't think you needed to reprimand an editor for removing unsourced material.--3family6 (talk) 02:00, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, he seemed like a newbie so I wanted to inform him for next time. I'm sorry if I was a bit too glib. I'll be more careful next time.--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 02:06, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Emo barnstar

		The Emo Barnstar
		I hereby award you the Emo Barnstar for your great work expanding and referencing List of emo artists. The article has been in dire need of attention for a long time. Keep up the great work! IllaZilla (talk) 21:30, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Feedback

I have replied to your request for feedback at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 June 11. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

List Of Hardcore Bands

Can You fix that one dudes edits? I tried but my commputers being stupid and Won't. P.S. Also read your bio. Am I one of those editors or was that Walter and 3family? DCcomicslover (talk) 00:30, 24 November 2011 (UTC)DCcomicslover

I'm at school right now. I'll take care of it when I get home in a few hours. Thanks for letting me know.--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 00:33, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Haha Thanks! I just got back from across the state so this is one of the first things I check when I get back. DCcomicslover (talk) 00:38, 24 November 2011 (UTC)DCcomicslover

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Invisiboy42293/Scripted has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scripted, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 02:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Scripted, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Dazzle Vision

While I do agree that one or more of my sources behind adding Dazzle Vision to the list of screamo bands do not meet the WP:RS, I do however know that both articles describe the band as Screamo. I have also uploaded sound bites of two Dazzle Vision as well and they are screamo, trust me. If you would like, I will expand my sources search and get more references stating that the band is Screamo. KaseyVincent (talk) 23:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

It's not me; beside's Wikipedia requiring (read WP:RS and WP:V if you haven't already), screamo is such a contentious genre that artists are constantly getting removed by unregistered users, and if there's no reliable source accompanying the entry, they're fully allowed to do that.

Also, it's not more references you need so much as better ones. I just ran a Google search, and most of the "sources" I found were copies of one of the band's press releases (not usable under WP:PRIMARY). Even one or two sources would be enough, so long as they're reliable and verify the claim made.--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 00:46, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nine Lashes in Kansas.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Nine Lashes in Kansas.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:51, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

The real problem with that image was that the name of the uploader is not the same as the one in Flikr, while the Anberlin image has the same name. I will nominate it because I said I would, but I don't expect it to be deleted.

On a completely separate note, that was an amazing picture. Great eye and timing. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:09, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

And that file is actually on WikiCommons and not actually on English Wikipedia, and their copyright rules are a bit different. Will follow-up though. --07:22, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

And there it states: "This image was originally posted to Flickr by TOMMY AU PHOTO at http://flickr.com/photos/12217707@N03/5522781506. It was reviewed on 13 March 2011 by the FlickreviewR robot and confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0." --Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:24, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

I re-uploaded the image to Wikimedia Commons, so hopefully that will help with some of the issues that got it deleted. For now, I'll wait until it's been reviewed by someone there before adding it back to the article.--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 04:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Re: This Runs Through

The article was PRODded before and also AfD'ed. The PROD happened earlier this year, which, as a matter of procedure, makes the article ineligible for a second PROD. The AfD was carried out in 2008; since then, the article was re-created. Oftentimes, this would qualify it for speedy deletion under G4, but this new article was worked on by other editors, who added additional materials and sources; since it no longer resembles the deleted version, it'd have to have a second AfD to be deleted. Since the band qualifies under a couple of bullet points of WP:MUSIC as notable, I have contested the PRODs and would vote to keep in AfD, but you are of course free to act as you see fit. Chubbles (talk) 05:37, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

List of Christian metal bands

Hi Invisibo42293, I noticed that you reverted List of Christian metal bands to a previous version. Unfortunately, some of the disambiguations I put in there got caught in this as well. I hope you don't mind me putting those back in. Thanks! (talk) 18:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Invitation: WikiProject Autism

Greetings! You are hereby invited to WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of autism, Asperger syndrome, and Autistic culture on Wikipedia. As the project emphasizes contribution from autistic editors, it is especially interested in you, who have chosen to list yourself as a Wikipedian with Asperger syndrome. Muffinator (talk) 06:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia ads	file info – #251

Editing again?

Are you editing again? If so, welcome back!--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:15, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorta kinda. I have other things going on right now, and I'm not as into Christian rock as I used to be, but my account's still up so I'll probably pop in every now and again, time permitting. But thanks for the welcome.--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 21:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rav Shmuel (musician) has been accepted

Rav Shmuel (musician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Dov Rosenblatt) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dov Rosenblatt, Invisiboy42293!

Wikipedia editor BeowulfBrower just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Cite that last sentence in the lead paragraph and you'll be golden

To reply, leave a comment on BeowulfBrower's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Mr. Shabbos

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mr. Shabbos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 03:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Jewish rock

Hi, I noticed your creation of this new article. When you copy text from other Wikipedia articles, you need to add a template to the talk page to indicate where the material came from. Yoninah (talk) 10:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out. I edited that paragraph a bit so its not exactly the same as the original article, but let me know if you think the "copied" template is still warranted.--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 19:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your support

Thank you for participating in the Women in Music edit-a-thon
	January 2016 More than 250 articles were created Hosted by Women in Red (... check out our next event)

--Ipigott (talk) 08:49, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting our editathons

	Thank you for contributing to our June 2016 editathons There were over 350 articles on Women in Entertainment, 55 on Jewish Women's History and 50 on Women in LGBTQ Host: Women in Red June 2016 #wikiwomeninred Our next event: Women in Halls of Fame

--Ipigott (talk) 16:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Deletion discussion about Chemy Soibelman

Hello, Invisiboy42293,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Chemy Soibelman should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemy Soibelman .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, TheLongTone (talk) 15:52, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of UpKeep Technologies

Hello Invisiboy42293,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged UpKeep Technologies for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:33, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Invisiboy42293

Thank you for creating Perl Wolfe.

User:Rosguill, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The "Artistry" section could probably be folded into the "Early life" section, since it largely concerns the circumstances of Wolfe's youth.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

DS alert: Arab-Israeli conflict

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Gut voch, just notifying you of this as some of the content at the excellent Jews and punk rock falls within the above topic. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Gotcha, I was thinking of that while writing it and tried to be relatively diplomatic. And thanks for the compliment! This took a long time to finish and I'm glad it came out well! --Invisiboy42293 (talk) 07:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chemy Soibelman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chemy Soibelman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wozal (talk) 06:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Chemy Soibelman, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Toddst1 (talk) 22:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Hey Todd. First off, I've been an editor here for over 15 years - you don't need to give me the standard newbie editor template, you can just talk to me straight.

Second, I'm claiming expertise here as someone directly familiar with Orthodox Judaism (raised in it since I was 10 and still part of the community). There are cultural signifiers that people in that community will immediately recognize as marking someone as an Orthodox Jew without them needing to explicitly say "I am an Orthodox Jew" - for example, this Instagram post where the subject is wearing a kippah and tefillin and using Orthodox-specific phrases like daven, Hashem, gan eden, and zecher tzar livracha in the caption. I can use that Instagram post as a source if you'd prefer, but as someone part of that community, it is extremely self-evident to those who would be in the know enough to look up the subject that he is an Orthodox Jew. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 22:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

So, as a 15 year veteran, you would know that your reasoning above is WP:OR. Apparently not. Toddst1 (talk) 01:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Using knowledge of a given field or subculture to understand the context of a source in ways that other editors might not is not WP:OR - I am not inventing anything that anyone familiar with the culture could not glean from that source. The same way that someone familiar with punk rock would know the appropriate sources and context for an article on a punk band, or someone familiar with Indian culture would for an article on that. This is something Wikipedia editors do all the time, something they are encouraged to do. I refer you to WP:NOTOR#Translation and contextualizing, particularly the third bullet. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 05:59, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

The WP:BURDEN to prove it's not WP:OR is on you. That's done with a citation. Toddst1 (talk) 20:17, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

1) I literally just linked to a policy page proving that what I'm describing does not fall under WP:OR, and 2) I have provided a citation, in the form of the post I linked before from the subject's Instagram showing him wearing tefillin and using terminology that directly identify him as Orthodox to anyone who knows that culture. For comparison, this is the equivalent of if a subject who had exclusively been a member of Christian bands made a public post showing them attending church, with a caption discussing their love of Jesus and God and the Bible and the close relationship they had with their pastor, and you objected to it being a source for the subject being Christian because it doesn't explicitly have the words "I am a Christian".

I'm happy to add that Instagram post to the article as a source to resolve this dispute, but as I've demonstrated, Wikipedia considers it WP:NOTOR to summarize a source based on knowledge of cultural context or native language. Something isn't OR just because a source doesn't explicitly spell it out in those exact words. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 21:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Something isn't OR just because a source doesn't explicitly spell it out Yeah, you're somewhere between WP:OR and WP:SYN. Just because he talks about jewish holidays or wears garb that jewish people sometimes wear doesn't mean he's jewish. From WP:SYN Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source. You need a source that says he's jewish. You really, really should know this. Toddst1 (talk) 00:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

That is literally not what I'm doing, as I already explained. Directly quoting from WP:NOTOR under the "Translation and contextualizing" heading:

"Sources may be written in a fictional, nationalistic, religious or other narrow context. Material from these sources incorporated into Wikipedia must be placed in a broader, more encyclopedic context; this is different from taking things out of context. For example: material written in a fictional context needs to be described in an out of universe perspective; material written from a localized or nationalistic perspective must be presented in a perspective consistent with a world-wide viewpoint; religious dogma must be characterized as such, and not presented as accepted fact outside of that religion. This is not original research when good editorial judgment is used." (emphasis added) Again, using context to properly interpret a source is neither OR nor SYNTH.

And to be clear, this is not a case of "Jewish people sometimes say/do this" - tefillin are worn exclusively by religious Jews, expressions like "hashem took ur neshama to gan eden amen" (God took your soul to paradise, Amen), "daven for klal yisreal" (pray for the Jewish people), "Bh" (common abbreviation for "Baruch Hashem" or "Praise God", and "zecher tzar livracha - may your neshama have an aliya" (your righteous memory should be a blessing, may your soul ascend) are all phrases exclusively associated with Orthodox Jews, and plenty of sources and sociological research supports this. Unless you contend that the guy is secretly a Messianic (which is a way more audacious claim and would very much require a source on your part), there is no way for an educated person to look at this source, combined with the context of everything else known about the subject, and not conclude that the guy is an Orthodox Jew.

Not all synthesis is SYNTH. SYNTH would require a conclusion that is not verifiable from the source - which is not the case here for anyone knowledgeable about this culture. If you'd like to run this by other Orthodox Jewish Wikipedians to verify anything I've said, you're more than welcome (unless you'd like to assume expertise in this culture, which wouldn't be very WP:NPOV of you). Invisiboy42293 (talk) 02:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

I also have to say, the fact that you're pulling this same exact nonsense on two different articles of mine, one of which is still a draft and the other based on an obscure musician, makes me really skeptical that you're acting in good faith here. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 05:40, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced WP:DOBs to Wikipedia, as you did at Chrissy Chlapecka. As explained several times, WP:SYN says do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source. Calculating an age is vastly different than synthesizing a WP:DOB from two sources. Toddst1 (talk) 04:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Paid editing and disclosing your client/employer

You still need to disclose who paid you to edit here per the Terms of Use: [1]. Toddst1 (talk) 15:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

The subjects of those articles paid a company called My Wiki Pro, and that company in turn paid me as a freelancer. As mentioned on my user page, I haven't worked for that company in nearly three years. I didn't formally disclose at the time because I was unsure of the exact process for doing so. (I'm sure you know how labyrinthine Wikipedia can be at times.) I'm actually still not entirely sure how to do it, so info on that would be helpful.

For whatever it's worth, I never had direct contact with any of the subjects, and both I and the company I worked for ensured that any content I wrote met Wikipedia guidelines for things like notability and reliable sourcing. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 22:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Links to user pages and sandboxes

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Jane Decker. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for catching that! I was working on both that article and Belle Histoire in my userspace simultaneously and I thought I fixed all of the links when moving, but it sounds like I missed one. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 22:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Griffin Maxwell Brooks. I can't believe you're stil; synthesizing years of birth for living people from an age at a point in time. Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source. You've been warned and blocked for this already. Knock it off! Toddst1 (talk) 03:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

• SYNTH would be using both sources for the entire date, as I did before. Here, one source verifies the day of birth, and one verifies the year. Each source affirms the claim that it is placed after.
• It was established by another editor in our previous Arbitration over Chrissy Chlapecka that the concern was not SYNTH, but whether it could be seen as violating the subject's privacy (which it decidedly is not when the subject has openly divulged their age and birthday on public platforms).
• Draft articles are not subject to the same standard as mainspace articles, as they are unfinished works in progress

Do you seriously have nothing better to do than harass me over this? Invisiboy42293 (talk) 03:31, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, draft articles, talk pages and anything else here is subject to WP:BLP. BLP applies to material about living persons in other articles and on other pages. I wouldn't try to WP:WIKILAWYER this if I were you. Don't believe me? Keep it up and enjoy your block. Toddst1 (talk) 03:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

First off, far as I can tell you're not an admin so you have no authority to threaten me with a block, much less from my own userspace. If you'd like to complain to one of the admin noticeboards about me then be my guest, although I feel pretty confident that'll turn out worse for you than for me. Also the broad application of WP:BLP is meant for things that could be libelous or otherwise spread damaging information - not whether someone's publicly known birthday is sourced correctly. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 04:23, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

WP:DOB says you have no idea what you're talking about. You really should read it. I've tried to explain it more than a few times but you're obviously not even trying to understand. Toddst1 (talk) 14:27, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

I do understand - I just happen to think you're wildly misapplying guidelines in ways and contexts they weren't intended for, focused specifically on my edits for some reason. If you really think my interpretation of Wikipedia guidelines is wrong, feel free to head to the noticeboards and get an admin to weigh in; I'm more than happy to share my side of things and get a conclusive ruling. But I'm tired of this petty talk page back-and-forth and I'm not going to edit war with you anymore. Either get an admin to tell me off for my supposedly grievous misbehavior, or leave me alone. Because right now you're really violating this rule, and that's the nicest way I can put it. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 18:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Griffin Maxwell Brooks has been accepted

Griffin Maxwell Brooks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:14, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Request

Hi!!!!! You did a wonderful job beefing up corook and I really appreciate that. I was wondering, since queer indie music tiktokers seem to be of interest, if you’d be willing to try beefing up Leith Ross (singer). It is unfortunately being threatened with deletion which seems bonkers to me because We’ll Never Have Sex was everywhere for awhile. I just have been struggling with mustering enough energy to attempt to save it. Thanks for your consideration and for helping the corook piece! ❤️ Elttaruuu (talk) 14:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

No problem! 💖 And absolutely, I took a look at the article and left an opposing message in the deletion discussion since, from what I can tell, this person meets WP:BAND on multiple counts. I'll at the very least do a sweep of the references to improve the formatting, and if I have the energy I'll try to beef it up like I did the corook article.

Also if you're interested, there's a WikiProject dedicated to TikTok coverage, it's unfortunately semi-active right now but it might be a good way to get involved with more articles like this! ❤ Invisiboy42293 (talk) 21:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Also for future reference, it might be good to demo articles like these either in your sandbox or in a drafts. That can give you time to properly format stuff, do all the sourcing, write more, etc. without immediately getting scrutinized for notability. Believe me I know from experience lol Invisiboy42293 (talk) 21:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for this insight!!! Elttaruuu (talk) 01:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Eleri Ward has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Eleri Ward. Thanks! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up! That makes sense, I'd encountered them on other articles I've made since starting this draft and had a feeling they weren't the most reliable. Thankfully there's more than enough coverage from Playbill and other sources to make up the difference. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 01:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Catieosaurus (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Toddst1 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Catieosaurus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toddst1 (talk) 14:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Hey @Toddst1 I went ahead and did the edits needed for the article, cleaned up some of the material, added more sources, and moved it to mainspace. Just wanted to let you know. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 23:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Invisiboy42293 (talk) 00:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedian, its too dangerous to go alone. Take this with you, on your travels?

MrDragonBoi has given you some kittens! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companions forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else some kittens, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kittens}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.

I know I just like gifting virtual rewards, but what the heck? Besides, I'm kinda new to Wikipedia (unless I have time to study my fave Wikipedia book; "The Art of Wikipedia: How not to heck up nor get blocked", although I wish it was real ;-;) Have a great time! MrDragonBoi (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! If you haven't already checked it out, you can find a good ground-level tutorial on editing Wikipedia here. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 20:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eleri Ward has been accepted

Eleri Ward, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eleri Ward

Hello Invisiboy42293,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Eleri Ward for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Eleri Ward to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

greyzxq ^talk 21:38, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Blondshell

hi invisiboy42293,

i manage Blondshell and we are so thrilled to have you as a fan. when she was really young, as BAUM, she did a few interviews and revealed personal details that she's not comfortable sharing with the world anymore. obviously, anyone can google and find these articles, but in the interest of protecting her privacy, we really would prefer to keep some of the unsavory stuff about her family and past struggles off her wikipedia. it looks like you keep adding them back, but maybe we can find a way to not have them here? totally respect your approach to carefully curated wikipedias, but i hope you can understand the impact here, human-to-human. you can find my email address super easily and if you want, i'd be happy to take this to email, as well as send you blondshell merch/records/tickets. lemme know what you think.

-shira 2603:8000:E101:94AA:31EF:3418:C56E:D495 (talk) 23:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi Shira,

I want to be clear, on a human level I absolutely get where you and your client are coming from, and I definitely don't mean to cause any undue distress. However, it's important to note that Wikipedia is meant to be an objective encyclopedia with a neutral point of view (and is not meant to simply promote the subject), and sometimes that means including unflattering or unpleasant information (when notable and relevant) even if the subject would prefer it not be there. Obviously there are exceptions - particularly with regard to privacy concerns - but like you mentioned, these interviews are publicly available and anyone with Google could find them. I can consult some other Wikipedia editors to get their opinion on this (and if there are legitimate safety concerns involved obviously that's very different), but I'm sorry to say, at least as it stands, I don't think I could convincingly justify removing that information. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 00:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Yotzeret Sheydim moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yotzeret Sheydim, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: B. Dylan Hollis has been accepted

B. Dylan Hollis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 23:37, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Nice work on B. Dylan Hollis! BuySomeApples (talk) 23:39, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

You should also consider nominating this for WP:DYK, to put a neat fact about the article (wacky recipes etc) on the front page. BuySomeApples (talk) 23:41, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much! I'll look into that! Invisiboy42293 (talk) 05:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Hanan Ben-Ari has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hanan Ben-Ari. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:40, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Appreciated! For the record, I did mean for the bullets to be converted to prose; I was honestly kinda hoping submitting to AfC might attract more editors to help write the article quicker, although I recognize that's not the typical way to do that. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 07:55, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jewlicious has been accepted

Jewlicious, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:36, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Ways to improve Banshee (musician)

Hello, Invisiboy42293,

Thank you for creating Banshee (musician).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This is a good piece of writing. Broad and in-depth. However, it relies too heavily on quotations. Consider re-phrasing some of these in order to achieve a more encyclopedic tone, especially some of the longer ones.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|IceBergYYC}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

IceBergYYC (talk) 05:53, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback! I just went through the article to cut down on all the quotations, and according to the Copyvio bot it seems to be an acceptable amount now. I think the template can be removed now but let me know if there are any other issues. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 02:04, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Yotzeret Sheydim

Hello, Invisiboy42293. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yotzeret Sheydim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Desire Wire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollywood. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)