Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of October 2011.

Welcome!

Hello, Jggouvea, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Dr Debug (Talk) 01:43, 8 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Jggouvea! Why don't you contribute to the Portuguese Wikipedia too? Arges 13:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
One day I may contribute to it too. Right now I am overwhelmed with a lot of personal projects and giving little time to Wikipedia. I will also eventually produce a small text explaining why I started with the English Wikipedia in the first place. jggouvea 03:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Guilherme from CAE

edit

Hey José Geraldo, how are you? I take you remember me, for we took CAE together. Anyways, I just want to know how your test went, since you were in pain while taking it. I'm proud to say that I got an A, with honors! My highest grade was in speaking. Let me know how yours went. Good bye! Guilherme —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.78.82.228 (talk) 01:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC). PS: My username is luguiacastroReply

That's awesome! All of my papers were within exceptional, except for writing and speaking that were above it. I think you should take the other test, Profiency, as well! Give yourself some time to prepare for it, but don't miss this opportunity! C-ya!

edit on Leite de Onça

edit

Thanks for the fix to the Leite de Onça entry. What is cocoa licor? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Philvarner (talkcontribs) 05:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC).Reply


Thanks! Philvarner 03:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Brazil Collaboration

edit
  Hello! You showed support for Brazil Collaboration. This time is the Brazil Collaboration. Hope you can help.
Cast your vote to select the next collaboration!
Nominate an article that could be greatly improved.

JoãoFelipe   ( Let's talk! ) 22:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiLove

edit

Keep this place a good place. :) King Alaric 16:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)KatxCoreReply

That's whay I want to do, Your Majesty! ;-). Thanks for the happy grin! jggouvea 02:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Possession

edit

Thanks for the explanation, I will use a "see also" link to join the both. --Lucyintheskywithdada (talk) 05:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

interested in the Portuguese-speaking world

edit

Hi. I'm Beth, known on Wikipedia as Learnportuguese. I am very interested in the Portuguese language and the Portuguese-speaking world. The whole concept of saudade is fascinating. If you want, chek out my user page and talk page and put a watch on both. I have very interesting discussions there. You are very welcome to contribute. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 16:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

tip, but please do not reply

edit

Adding comments to another user's talk page is not a minor edit. Just so you know. Obrigada pela sua ajuda. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 13:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Potential superpowers

edit

Olá Jggouvea! Há uma discussão ocorrendo em Talk:Potential superpowers#Removal of Brazil e gostaríamos da sua opinião. Obrigado pela atenção! Felipe C.S ( talk ) 00:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Brazil

edit

Olá Jggouvea! Estou organizando uma força tarefa para levar o artigo "Brazil" ao status de Featured. Antes que eu apresentasse os problemas do artigo, queria saber se você está interessado e disponível. Atenciosamente; Felipe C.S ( talk ) 21:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Satanic Head

edit

Hmm... I'm sorry, I can't help! I was doing some translations of articles in the Esperanto Wikipedia which didn't have a corresponding article in the English Wikipedia, and I couldn't find references (perhaps I shouldn't have translated it in the first place). The Esperanto version has no references and has remained unchanged since 2005, as has the Portuguese version (which is tagged as an unreferenced article). If it helps, the original author on the Esperanto wiki is Roberto. He speaks Esperanto and Portuguese, but I don't think he speaks English. He's a professor of archeology at the Brazilian National Institute of History and Art Heritage. There's a risk this could be original research. --Sumthingweird (talk) 00:40, 2 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumthingweird (talkcontribs)

Hi, the original author of Satanic Head has now replied to me, citing the following sources [1][2][3][4]. They're all in Portuguese (one of the benefits, and difficulties, of the Esperanto Wikipedia is that because of the linguistic diversity of the contributors, there is also a diversity of source languages). Is it possible to restore the article and include the sources? --Sumthingweird (talk) 05:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
References [5] and [6] are roughly the same text. Makes me wonder who plagiarised who. It mus be also added that "Recanto das Letras" is a website for amateur writers and that Fernando Dannemann identifies himself as a "contador de histórias" (storyteller). Referece [7][8] is too brief to be even useful. Reference [9] is currently offline.
All in all, references are not authoritative and, even if the character does exist, it might not be notable enough to deserve a separate wikipedia page. jggouvea (talk) 22:46, 15 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Spiritist doctrine for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spiritist doctrine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiritist doctrine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. damiens.rf 16:37, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation

edit

Your upload of File:CaseusSemperOptimus.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
Hello! This is You Awarded a Barnstar For Your Edits! National Names 2000 (talk) 07:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

A Food For You!

edit
  A Proja
This Is Delicious And Good Enough To Eat National Names 2000 (talk) 14:15, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey!

edit

Can You Please Edit Please About This? About Rede Globo You Must Edit The 20 Years. National Names 2000 (talk) 03:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mascots of Brazilian football sides for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mascots of Brazilian football sides is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mascots of Brazilian football sides until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 22:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Spiritist practice

edit
 

The article Spiritist practice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant since Spiritism already exists, material entirely unsourced, practice not separately notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply