Nomination for deletion of Template:California Golden Seals - Cleveland Barons seasons

edit

 Template:California Golden Seals - Cleveland Barons seasons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the Empire of Liberty upload

edit

Sorry about my reversion of your edit; I hadn't purged/reloaded the Empire of Liberty page, so it's still showing up with the sticker on it, but when I look at the file page I see you've replaced it with the cover sans that. Great to have that! Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 23:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

No worries, I though as much. Thank you for taking on the project of improving articles on these books! Jmj713 (talk) 23:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:You Like It Darker

edit
 

Hello, Jmj713. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "You Like It Darker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 23:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Eternal (Klaus Schulze album)

edit

Hi @Jmj713: I had to revert this article after I reviewed it, part of the WP:NPP process. I couldn't find anything on it. Just reverting it and not adding sourcing is deep uncool and probably disruptive. That was the reason the redirect was put in the first place, because its not sourced. If you have genuine referenced put them, but if you revert it without adding source, I'll need to start issuing warnings against you, for disruptive editing. I did a WP:BEFORE to search for coverage and their is not a lot. A couple of decent reviews using sources from WP:MUSICRS would do it. scope_creepTalk 20:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but what I feel is disruptive is deleting correct information. I'm always for preserving information, not removing it. There are links and sources already added to the article, and I feel those are enough. There is not a lot of coverage, this is true, but that doesn;t mean information about this album should just be deleted, I completely disagree with that approach. Jmj713 (talk) 21:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply