User talk:Od Mishehu/Archive9

Restoring Page - DEACOM Integrated Accounting and ERP Software

I've created the page "DEACOM Integrated Accounting and ERP Software" that you recently deleted. How may I go about restoring this page while ensuring it is not deleted again? I tried to make it as general as possible, following suit after competitor products listed on wikipedia (see Batchmaster, SAP). Can you provide some insight? 66.212.6.210 (talk) 12:38, 29 September 2008 (UTC)shaws1131

If it looks like a neutral article, not an advertisement. Please note that words like "solution" tend to be interpreted as advertisement words - see the page on words to avoid. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Tom Sayle

I've reprotected the page because this user is a sockpuppeteer who is likely to return to edit under another name. We aren't blocking as a punishment; rather, blocking is to prevent further disruption, and under that premise, I am protecting this talk page from anon edits as well. We want any further action on the part of admins to become absolutely unnecessary, so that we can focus on other more important tasks. I hope you understand. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Restoring image - File:O(1D) from O3.jpg

You recently deleted an image File:O(1D) from O3.jpg that was part of an article on Photofragment-ion imaging currently under construction. The image was uploaded with the permission of the copyright owner and a hangon tag because I have not yet had a chance to discuss Wikipedia's license conditions with the author. Could you please reply to me on the talk page of the Photofragment-ion imaging article outlining exactly what I need to take to keep the image, and any future images, that may need to be added to the primary article to improve its usefulness. LaserRepairman (talk) 08:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

For your information, Wikipedia allows only 2 kinds of images:

1. Free images - images which have a license which allows subsequent re-use, including creating derivative works and commercial use.
2. Fair use - see WP:FAIRUSE for a description of the conditions necessary.

עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:17, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for telling me about redirects to categories. The Llama! (talk) 10:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Museums / A7

Hi Od Mishehu. You pointed out that museums are not subject to A7. Can you show me where I can find a list of the stuff that's suggested by the plain language ("organizations") that isn't covered? This is the second time today that I got that comment (on "stuff" generally, not "museums", that is). Thanks. Bongomatic (talk) 11:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't think it should apply to museums any more than it does for schools (explicitly excluded in CSD A7). I am unaware of any such list like you're requesting. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

American Fighter Deletion

American fighter Im not sure if this is the red link that you need, but you can find a red link from the Rich Franklin page.

Rich Franklin

I am interested in learning why this page was deleted. I am prepared to discuss this and talk about reasons that I think it should be on Wikipedia.

Thank you - Ross Lindy

Ross412 (talk) 14:52, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Manchester United Jersey Collection.JPG

The media type was not the issue, the problem is I can't see this ever being used in anything. Ironholds (talk) 15:23, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

The CSD you gave says "Files uploaded that are neither image, sound, nor video files (e.g. .doc, .pdf, or .xls files) which are not used in any article and have no foreseeable encyclopedic use". To the best of my reading, there is no CSD which applies to free JPeg images which have no reasonable chance of being used. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh and, thought it was an or. IfD it is then. Thanks! :). Ironholds (talk) 10:18, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Shacklesons Disease

Hi, I Afd'd the article. You can comment on it here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shacklesons Disease. Thanks --Flewis^(talk) 13:13, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Semi-Protection

Hi! Could you please semi-protect my talk page as it's being vandalized by a well-known French-speaking troll. See m:Vandalism reports/BogaertB. Antique Rose (talk) 09:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Please discuss this issuer at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Clemoule. Please also note that the user is now blocked for 3RR - although it may be extended to indef if it can be shown that Clemoule is this same troll. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Abu Rayhan Biruni

Hey there. You deleted Abu Rayhan Biruni per my request... but then you restored it. I need to move the article there from the version with macrons on the letters (Wikipedia naming vio). ناهد/(Nåhed) _speak! 12:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

My bad, I didn't realise it was the edit history that was the move issue. Thanks for doing it and nevermind my n00b. ناهد/(Nåhed) _speak! 12:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Vandal

Resolved

 – both blocked by Jayron32. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Could you please block and rollback the vandal who vandalized my user page today and keeps calling people yankee as he vandalizes. Please see: User:History2007/Content protection and the IPs therein about it as well. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 13:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

To deal efficiently with sockpuppetry, Wikipedia has a page to report suspicions of such behavior - WP:SSP. Admins who know how to determine whether or not sockpuppetry has occurred will be there. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, but the 2 user accounts are still there. History2007 (talk) 13:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Hanaharu Naruko

Toda la hodaah. Be derekh klal, lo omrim shum devar kshe lo maskimim ba "speedy." Lehitraot. :) --Cbdorsett (talk) 15:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Vincenzo Dentamaro

Well, I want to know why you have deleted the SFS Technology page and who permit it ! There are no motivation to do this. Now, I want to know why you have do it ! The article was good integrated with other articles and a lots of sites where linked there. I think that this isn't democracy and that you have trampled the principles of democracy !

Vincenzo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.53.224.102 (talk) 08:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

It was deleted per this discussion back in July. According to Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, any page which is deleted as a result of a deletion discussion, recreations of it can be speedy deleted. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:53, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Unblock request of User talk:118.92.211.247

You recently declined the unblock request of this user, but you seem to have been a bit too hasty in declining. A look at the block log shows the IP was actually blocked for 31 hours about a week ago, and so shouldn't be blocked now. Most likely the user saw the message on their talk page and was confused. Their only edit since the block was not vandalism. Next time, taking the time to review a user's contributions and block log would be beneficial. Thanks. Raven4x4x (talk) 08:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Trackless Sea

Hello. I'm not sure what content was under Trackless Sea when you deleted it; since then a redirect has been placed there. If it was not copyvio, could you please restore the edit history? Thanks! BOZ (talk) 05:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

As you can see for yourself, all there was there was a redirect to a deleted article. The article in question is Taylola. I see no reason why this needs to be undeleted, but I have no objection now that there is a new redirect at Trackless Sea. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Was it only a redirect with nothing else in the history? That is, was it an article that had been redirected, or was it originally created as a redirect and had never been anything but a redirect? BOZ (talk) 12:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

There was nothing but a redirect. First a user tried to create a redirect, but accidentally used single square brackets in stead of double; the second revision is fixing the redirect, and the third revision is tagging for speedy deletion as a redirect to a deleted page. The redirect target, Taylola, was tagged for PROD as a "non-notable sea" and deleted 6 days later. Just for the record, it was a 2 sentence long stub, where the second sentence is "It is also known as the Trackless Sea by the Faerûn". עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

OK cool, thanks. :) BOZ (talk) 16:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

I'll work up from the bottom of the style WP:Update so I stay out of your way. - Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 14:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

a mystery

why you have to bother me about the image is a mystery to me. Thanks for nothing. I'll re-upload it and not change a thing. Wilkos (talk) 18:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the Adbillsoft article and User:Jamesbaek

Hello there. As I am a new administrator, I thought I would ask a more experienced one for advice on this matter. Namely, as this user seems to do nothing but create promotional material, and the aforementioned article has been created twice now, is it appropriate to:

1. Block the user (and if so, should I apply an indefinite block)?
2. Protect the article from recreation?

Thanks in advance. It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 17:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Salting should only be done if there's a number of accounts causing problems here; in this case there only seems to be one. Additionally, it's not just one title that's a problem - there's several. So no need to salt.

About blocking - here we come into the area where some admins are quicker to block, while others aren't as quick. I would probably have given the user a {{uw-create4im}} template before blocking, although others may not do so. The block probably should be indef. It also seemas to be the case that if a couple days go by without any edits by the user, the issue is considered to be "stale", and no block is to be done unless there's more problems. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:13, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Your declination of unblock of IP User:194.72.9.25

You declined the unblock with a reason of "Please make this request whilst logged in". If I had been able to edit whilst I was logged in I wouldn't have had to request the unblock of that IP address. I was able to find a way around the block, but if an editor posts as an IP and claims to be a regular editor, you should AGF that it is the case. Mjroots (talk) 21:53, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

As far as I could tell, this request could only have been made due to an autoblock. This is because your account wasn't blocked directly, and the IP address had an anon only block (which means that registered users can edit through it), and there was no range block. Under those circumstances, you should have been able to make an unblock request while logged in; admins tend to decline lifting autoblocks when only anon users request it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, I was logged in, and then got a message that the IP had been blocked. I was unable to edit despite being logged in, so resorted to logging out to post on the talk page. Had to log in on the secure server to carry on editing which was highly annoying because I then have to confirm each new page viewed. This problem really needs to be sorted out, as it's happened twice to me this weekend. Mjroots (talk) 08:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Even if there was an autoblock on the IP address, you still should have been able to edit your own talk page while logged in. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Your moving of certain CSD notice templates

Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace#UW templates for CSD. Thanks. Anomie⚔ 13:15, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Unblock Request Notification

Hello, Od Mishehu! A user you have blocked, Positivemagazine (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), has requested to be unblocked, and your username is listed on my notification opt-in page. The unblock request is on his user talk page here. If you no longer want to recieve these notifications, remove your name from my list. If you would like to be notified about future unblock requests from this user, remove this template from your page. Thank you, DavidWSBot (talk) 18:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Airfrance353's unblock request

Erm, that edit was made almost a year ago. Garden. 11:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm aware of this. My point is that none of the user's edits were constructive, and his only claim of what he did wrong is "arrogance". I would also like to point out that I had just looked at his userpage - and it seems like he is a sockpuppet. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

I endorse your decision. --Oxymoron⁸³ 12:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok, just making sure. Garden. 12:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

When Misfits Collide article

I have tried to find the content through google search yet i have found no luck to find anything that is about the "film" or anything that connects to the cartoon that the "film" is based upon, all the actors thats starring it including Drake Bell, Britney Spears and her sister together would of sureley get lots of mentions through different sites but not one single mention which make it look like a fake, writtin by and made up by a user a waste of wikipedia's space this is the main reason to why i put the speedy delete tag up with notabilty second if it had exsited. I will be putting the tag up again and if you remove the tag i will see another admin about this coz it definitly looks to be fake and it should not be on wikipedia. Pro66 (talk) 13:09, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

I didn't say it shouldn't be deleted. I merely said that it isn't covered by any criterion for speedy deletion. We do have CSD A7 which covers real people, groups of real people, and web content; CSD A9 which covers musical recordings by people about whom there is no article; other subjects aren't speedy deletable under lack of notability. Even if it's a hoax, that doesn't make it speedy material unless it's a blatant hoax.

If you retag it, I promise I won't be the admin to deal with it. However, I doubt it will be deleted. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:47, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:Bruce Campbell

Didn't you close the discussion as delete? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

To the best of my understanding of Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Administrator instructions, the order of actions is:

1. Close the discussion.
2. Orphan the template (or put it in the holding cell and wait for it to be orphaned)
3. Delete the template.

Since stage 2 isn't done yet, it's too early to move on to stage 3. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Начало истории

Hello! You recently deleted Ленинградский диксиленд since the original author had either requested or blanked the page. I'm not sure if the original author forgot about this page, but it is the same subject and seems to have been mistakenly turned into a separate file. Is there something that can be done about this page? Thanks! -Yupik (talk) 19:55, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Checkusers

The tool is camel case; the users usually are not :) FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 17:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Not being a bot expert, can I check the name. The edit for bot reports links to Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bot, an odd name (repetition etc). Should this be Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Bot header or .../Bot reports, or something, like the other section headers? FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 18:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing out my mistake - I have moved the page to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bot. I chose this name per the currently existing Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Bot - feel free to rename it. There are no issues regarding the page name as far as HBC NameWatcherBot is concerned, until we tell it to start using this page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:42, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

SFD

Hi OM - I notice you removed a completed day from WP:SFD - they're usually left there until all the work is complete on them, including the bot-assisted moving of the articles (if needed) and deletion of old categories. Removing them before that's all finished makes it easier to miss things that should have been tidied up. Grutness...wha? 22:47, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

The Weather Network Logo.jpg

You may delete this image now i should have not uploaded it and it can be taken down. Thank You Kyle1278 (talk) 18:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

CSD Patroll Tagging in Twinkle

Twinkle should already do this, as long as the page that you're tagging is able to marked as patrolled. It's subject to the same restrictions as if you were to patrol a page manually; i.e. the "[Mark this page as patrolled]" link must be present, which only occurs if you reach the page from Special:NewPages. Additionally, there is a configuration parameter, called markSpeedyPagesAsPatrolled, that can be used to enable or disable the functionality. Let me know if you're having problems with the feature on my talk page and I'll be happy to get you sorted out! Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 16:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

User talk:194.176.105.40

Just a heads up, as I see you've been working on this one - and no need for yet more admins barging in. A few more legal threats coming forth form the IP..... Pedro :  Chat  15:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

I just gave this IP address a last warning. Any more problems, please report it at WP:ANI. This IP address is related to a major vandal who several admins were trying to deal with. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the unblock. Here is the link to my arbitration which references the block - Arbitration Link Would appreciate your opinion on the matter. Wikifan12345 (talk) 06:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

I think I should stay far away from this specific arbcom case. My unblock had nothing to do with it - the decision to unblock you had already been made. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok thanks! Wikifan12345 (talk) 07:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks For The Unblock

Thank you very much for taking your own time to unblock me. I greatly appreciate what you have done!

Thanks, Take Care --Youstinklmao (talk) 09:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

17th Knesset

Your changes lead us to believe that there is no knesset right now. The 17th is over, and the 18th has not started? Can you confirm? Please reply here. --Shuki (talk) 12:32, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Correct. The 18th Knesset officially starts session 2 weeks after the elections, which this time is on the 24th. The old Knesset, I believe, was no longer in session by the weekend before the elections. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for IPBE

Hi, just wanted to say a big thank you for the IPBE, that's really helpful. mjec ^(t/c/p) 23:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Congrats

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Congratulations for all the contributions you make, thank you and keep up the good work. South Bay (talk) 21:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC)