Rshon13

AfC notification: Draft:Quantum phase space approach has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Quantum phase space approach. Thanks! Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment 41.63.150.4 (talk) 19:35, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quantum phase space approach (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quantum phase space approach and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:33, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Rshon13! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:33, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Rshon13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to avoid a conflict of interest

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:33, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Quantum phase space approach has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Quantum phase space approach. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:26, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment Rshon13 (talk) 17:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Quantum phase space approach moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Quantum phase space approach. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Theroadislong (talk) 11:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. However, I think this issue is already fixed because I already submit it for review before and made improvement according to the comment of the reviewer regarding this question. Rshon13 (talk) 13:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

I myself declared the possible existence of the CoI for transparency because my works are among the main sources. However these sources are published in peer reviewed high quality journal. Then as I said I already receives some feedback from previous review that helped me to improve the content. Now I think that it is ready for publication and any other issue can be discussed there . Rshon13 (talk) 13:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

You should let the AFC process play out fully, please do not move this into mainspace again yourself. MrOllie (talk) 14:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Quantum phase space approach has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Quantum phase space approach. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

January 2025

Hello, Rshon13. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to sources you may be affiliated with.

Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

If you wish to continue contributing, please first consider citing other reliable secondary sources such as review articles that were written by other researchers in your field and that are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite sources for which you may have a conflict of interest, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add {{Edit COI}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added. MrOllie (talk) 14:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. However the citation correspond to peer reviewed high quality scientific journals. Is there anything not good with that ? Rshon13 (talk) 16:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

I mean my goal is just to share knowledge that was and I use "peer reviewed paper" as references. Rshon13 (talk) 16:53, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

The conflict of interest is a problem, as explained in the initial message. All of your editing activity thus far has been promoting the work of a particular writer. MrOllie (talk) 17:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Could you show me where in the article I promote instead of just reporting a correct thing from the peer reviewed paper given in the references? It will be a pleasure of you could show me so that it can be corrected. Thank you Rshon13 (talk) 17:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

If you're not here to promote a particular persons work, I suggest you find a 'correct thing' from a peer reviewed paper written by someone else to include. MrOllie (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

My goal is not to promote someone but sharing knowledge that was peer reviewed. I ask you if you find something wrong in the text of the article so that it can be corrected? Thank you Rshon13 (talk) 17:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

And anything from a good sources related to the subject is welcome. Rshon13 (talk) 17:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

I already add various references from various authors and many links to Wikipedia articles related to the subject. And as I said anything from other good sources and references are welcome. Rshon13 (talk) 18:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, so no, 'anything from a good sources related to the subject' is not the bar. I think tilting articles inappropriately towards this particular person's ideas or work to be wrong. MrOllie (talk) 18:08, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

So your corrections are welcome if you find something wrong there? Rshon13 (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I've already reverted the inappropriate addition, so the corrections are in place. I suggest sticking to secondary sources from independent authors from now on. MrOllie (talk) 18:25, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

I asked if you find something wrong in the text which make you think that it promotes someone work instead of reporting scientific fact and knowledge (based on the content of high quality peer reviewed scientific journals ) ? Rshon13 (talk) 18:47, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

So that appropriate corrections can be made. Thank you Rshon13 (talk) 18:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Yes, and I responded, and the appropriate correction was to remove it. MrOllie (talk) 19:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry I did not see. Could you quote exactly the corresponding text that you remove ? Rshon13 (talk) 19:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

It is available in the history tab of the article in question. MrOllie (talk) 19:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Please, as you are here , could you quote what exactly in the text you removed was wrong ? So that I can learn from the mistakes if it is . Thank you Rshon13 (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

I have explained this in my comments above, I decline to repeat myself further. MrOllie (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry , have you already quote the wrong text from the article so that I can see it exactly? Rshon13 (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Why don't you quote the text and indicate clearly where it is wrong ? Rshon13 (talk) 19:17, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

I have explained this in my comments above, I decline to repeat myself further. This will be my last comment on your talk page on this subject. MrOllie (talk) 19:22, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, I just asked you to show clearly what exactly in the text (that you removed) is wrong and why? is it very difficult ? Rshon13 (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rshon13. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Theory of everything, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 19:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Your COI is strongly apparent and you must disclose this, or you risk being blocked from editing. SmartSE (talk) 19:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. I just report scientific information (nothing about people , company, clients, organization) that has been published in "peer reviewed scientific paper." So if something should be corrected about the way I report this information any corrections is welcome. Thanks Rshon13 (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

I think removing is not the best way. The sentences/text can be corrected if you think it promotes someone/something instead of just reporting the scientific information from the published peer reviewed paper (which is my goal). So could you indicates the sentences/ text which are concerned so that appropriate corrections can be made ? Rshon13 (talk) 19:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

I mean where in the text do you see a promotion ? Or which are not the scientific information published in the peer reviewed sources ? Rshon13 (talk) 19:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

You previously stated that you had a COI with regards to Quantum phase space. What did you mean by that? Are you saying that you have absolutely zero connection to any of the authors that you have cited? I wasn't asking any questions about the content you've added, but scientific articles should mainly be based of review articles, not primary research, so it is problematic whoever adds it. SmartSE (talk) 19:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

And looking at the earlier contributions by Rshon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) this is even more apparent: [1]. In case you haven't already seen it, please review WP:SELFCITE. If there is any questions raised by others about citing your own work (and there evidently are) you must request changes on talk pages rather than editing articles yourself. More broadly, if that is your only purpose for contributing here, then you are not here to write an encyclopaedia, but simply to promote your own work. SmartSE (talk) 19:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your explanation. My goal was to share new knowledge from published peer reviewed works not promoting But I respect the rules (sorry I did not have time to read in details). I mean by the COI that I am connected to the authors of some references. Unfortunately I don't have more time to enter the complication corresponding to a simple add of new published information without the goal for promoting. Anyway I respect the community rules. So I prefer to stop here. Please remove all my contributions including this draft article if they are not appropriate. Thank you Rshon13 (talk) 19:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)