- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 16:09, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- 2faced1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A neologism, a brand, a "movement"? It's not entirely clear what this article is talking about. The sources seem to indicate that it is something to do with fashion. In any event there doesn't seem to be much more here than hype which is attempting to appear to be notability. LadyofShalott 20:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Incoherent article about some sort of movement. Looks like self publicity. Malcolma (talk) 10:17, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Although it is not entirely incoherent, the flaw is no RS (per following search: article refs, Google News, NewsLibrary, Google, FindArticles, WorldCat.) FeatherPluma (talk) 03:06, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.