Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVCOE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 16:02, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AVCOE

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only reference is the company's own website, and a quick search found nothing but the usual blogs and social media. Clearly fails GNG. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as existing, accredited degree-awarding institution. Appable (talk) 02:52, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Care to back up this argument with a reliable source? You claim it's "existing" but how can you prove that without an independent reference? Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 06:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying it's a potential hoax? The accreditor's website has it on its registry. Appable (talk) 18:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as an accredited degree-awarding institution per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.