- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Alappallil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article, about a "well-known family" name, does not show notability or verifiability. I was unable to find any sources using Google News or Google books to verify any of the article's claims. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--ditto. No sources, no notability. Vanity. Drmies (talk) 01:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - probably lost something in translation. The Rockefeller Family is notable, but does not cover everyone named Rockefeller. Here only one person with that last name is claimed to be notable (although no sources are provided.) Racepacket (talk) 13:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable family. Salih (talk) 17:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N. Schuym1 (talk) 19:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Abecedare (talk) 00:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.