- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Anamika Press (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable, has WP:V, WP:N, WP:RS, and WP:COI issues. βcommand 14:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The press is well represented by its support to Indic open source. Its ICT division Indicybers has helped produce the first ever suite of programming langauges based on Indian languages. Please refer to the article on Hindawi Programming System. When the article on Indicybers was added it was redirected to this page; and now this page is marked for deletion. I agree this article needs updates / rewrites, but it is certainly not bad enough for deletion. Tell me one thing, since it is marked for deletion can I edit and add the refernces now? I suggest expanding the article on Indicybers, which is recognised independently and probably redirecting this page to that article, since the press now mainly functions as Indicybers with related publishing. But _please_ let us have a healthy detailed discussion. Hi pedler 06:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)hi_pedler[reply]
- Delete per nom. Hello again, Hi pedler; yes, you can add sources and references; again, though, the sources should be very clearly talking about Anamika Press. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.