- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 07:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Andrew Elissee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:GNG. Perhaps an article for his label exists in the future, but, I don't see an article for the designer specifically needed at this time. the majority of the sources are primary and I haven't found any decent English media coverage. SarahStierch (talk) 21:48, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I couldn't find any independent, reliable, secondary sources discussing this fashion designer. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per the nomination. Frankly, reading the article, at first it appeared that the subject might be notable, but in the absence of secondary sources I can not argue to keep the article. Also, the articles appear to be promotional.--Oceangreenn (talk) 13:57, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I fully agree with User:Oceangreenn (above). I was tempted nominate this as self-promotion piece myself, but hesitated in hopes that some non-English WP:RS would eventually come forward to properly establish notability of this individual. -- WikHead (talk) 23:12, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as per above. MaNeMeBasat (talk) 11:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.