Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aryeh Yitzhaki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 07:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aryeh Yitzhaki

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:32, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails all criteria for WP:ACADEMIC nor does he pass the "Average Professor" test. unique Google Scholar hits are few and far inbetween most being just quotes from and not actual legitimate publishing by or on subject of the article. Additionally I could find no clearly reliable sources of biographical information on said subject. Nefariousski (talk) 17:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I searched various bibliographic databases and don't appear to find anything much about or by Aryeh Yitzhaki. --Qwerty Binary (talk) 21:24, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is rare that people still in the position of Lecturer are considered notable here. DGG ( talk ) 22:54, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Multiple mentions in books, scholarly works, and news sources; however, none of these mentions pass the criteria set forth in WP:GNG, specifically none of them would be considered "significant coverage".--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF and WP:GNG. The single source we have on him is too passing in its coverage to be good for GNG, and is also a bit problematic from the point of view of WP:BLP since what coverage it has of the subject seems to be primarily aimed at attacking him. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.