Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badi' ud-Din Shah al-Rashidi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Badi' ud-Din Shah al-Rashidi

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was deleted via discussion in 2018, 22 years after the subject's death. However, based on the comments made in the discussion, it sounds like the article was not as well developed as it is now, though it was noted that the sources were basically retelling the same information. At present, the article contains 6 sources. 5/6 are in Urdu/Arabic, so if we have people to help verify the sources, that'd be great. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:34, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's great to bring it to the lights. The subject is very notable and well known around the sub continent and middle East. Everything i have written in an article is supported by urdu references, which mentions all things i have said. Please just verify them it was deleted due to not enough attention from the first creator. As i have built it from scrach, im willing to assist with any solution that brings it into light. Thank you🙂 SaneFlint (talk) 05:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Subject has article on urdu sindhi and arabic Wikipedia. Judt an reminder thank you. I hope editors will look into those references to verify #Notability SaneFlint (talk) 05:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above should be interpreted as an opinion to Keep the article. SaneFlint (talk) 05:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully editors will be able to understand the subject and translate its references,

that will really help i believe.

My opinion is to

Keep

Thanks. Had to post again as it wasnt properly mentioned SaneFlint (talk) 05:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've included additional references to enhance the article. Verification of Urdu and Arabic content is needed to clarify misunderstandings from the previous creator. I've taken the initiative to rebuild the article, and ongoing updates will be made. Seeking assistance from seniors to review references before voting. Your support is appreciated, I feel afd will enhance the article. Which is much needed development🙂 SaneFlint (talk) 12:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No pass of WP:Prof. Delete unless sources can be found for GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Delete: Per the previous discussion, sources are majorly biography of the subject. Source 6 - [1] is unreliable per the discussion on another AfD. No secondary sources. Jeraxmoira (talk) 07:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article, now has filled with additional references in Arabic and Urdu, requires verification. Previously, it faced deletion due to a lack of attention from Sindhi authors. Notably, information on the subject is available on Urdu, Sindhi, and Arabic Wikipedia pages. Hope it helps 🙂 SaneFlint (talk) 11:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Having articles on other language Wikipedias is irrelevant, they have a very different inclusion criteria. Theroadislong (talk) 12:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.