Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandaru Danaiah Kavi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bandaru Danaiah Kavi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was originally created and then speedied under A7. It was recreated and then the article was prodded and was deproded, but original concern was not addressed so we are at Afd. I am unable to locate reliable source coverage to establish notability. I note that there is also a Sockpuppet investigation regarding some of the editors on the article here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bandarudanaiahkavi. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 16:23, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 16:24, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 16:24, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Hmmmm, an apparent "conflict of interest". It isn't demonstrated that the subject meets WP:GNG. I do not consider the secondary sources reliable and the primary sources are basically social media blogs created by the subject (or by the article creator... It's difficult to tell as they share the same name). ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 17:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:BLP. No significant coverage in reliable sources is provided and I have found none. The references and external links are self-published sites. This is clearly self-promotional spam (WP:PROMO). The creator's user page User:Bandarudanaiahkavi (that was an entire copy of this article) was speedy deleted for the same reason. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 17:11, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.