Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlueID

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:33, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BlueID

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page seems like an advert, but I thought I should give it the benefit of the doubt and nominate an AfD. The references are terrible, as most of them are clearly adverts. Baimos is good for info, but doesnt help much with establishing notability, which is another big problem for this article. It doesnt even really assert notability, let alone show it. Benboy00 (talk) 16:55, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - can't find much evidence of notability. James^x1 2345 17:06, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:26, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia has notability criteria available for anyone to read and this article is not meeting those criteria. In particular, the sources cited are neither reliable sources nor are some of them about the subject of the article, and also the coverage does not indicate that this product meets WP:GNG. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - Seems to be a German thing with some degree of notability over there but I can't find anything about BlueID on the German Wikipedia. I'm unable to accurately assess reliability of the German sources cited in the article. ~KvnG 14:40, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.