Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buffett Early Childhood Fund

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, per WP:SOFTDELETE--Ymblanter (talk) 07:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buffett Early Childhood Fund

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article from the day it was created 3 years ago. Was tagged for speedy deletion right away which was declined with note to AfD this. No one has bothered. It remains as bad today as it was then. Citations are almost all to the program itself with no evidence of passing the WP:Golden rule. TNT, at least. Jytdog (talk) 03:08, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:34, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – I think it just fails WP:GNG and WP:NONPROFIT. I don't even see in my searches multiple reliable sources independent of this organization with which to write a neutrally worded stub. It's almost hard to believe such an article survived three years virtually unchanged. MisterRandomized (talk) 05:35, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.