- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete as nonsense by Moriori. Kimchi.sg 07:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
This nine year old girl is supposed to be a "celebutante," so I guess notability is asserted. She only gets 9 Google hits, however, so I smell a hoax. Erik the Rude 00:57, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not sure where you got 9 Google hits from. This spits out two hits- both from tripod sites set up by said girl.
The whole article's nonsense, and if it's not a hoax, she's just plain non-notable.I'm not sure what parents let their 9-year-old have such freedom on the Internet, but I hope she's not getting in any trouble. -- Kicking222 01:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)- No, that sentence is untrue. She would be notable if any of this was true- but, of course, it's not. I was unaware a 9-year-old could have her own record company and clothing line, yet still have time to appear on Letterman. -- Kicking222 01:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete nn, vanity, possible hoax, etc...--Jersey Devil 01:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete for reasons already mentioned. This should probably be speedied. DVD+ R/W 01:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Crazynas 02:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I can't find any valid sources either. --Starionwolf 02:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Thetruthbelow
(talk) 04:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.